| Submission declined on 25 October 2024 by Dan arndt (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: I highly doubt this subject will ever qualify for a Wikipedia article. When you write an encyclopedia article, you are not writing an essay about the subject. Instead, you are reporting on what others have written about the subject in multiple reliable independent secondary sources that discuss the subject in detail. You have none at this point. Social media sites like LinkedIn cannot be used as a source, and her employer's website is not independent. A quick web search didn't reveal any better sources. This is no reflection on the subject. Being an exceptional teacher is noble, honorable and impressive. What it isn't is notable, and notability is what's required to have a Wikipedia article. 4.37.252.50 (talk) 19:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Melanie Weaver is an ELA teacher at Highland School of Technology.[1]She served at Highland Junior High and North Gaston High School.[citation needed]She is the longest serving staff member of the school, having served at the school for 24 years from 2000-Current. She has announced her retirement during to take place during the 2024 school year.[2] When announcing her retirement, the school held celebrations to celebrate the astonishing educational career of Melanie. She has received the Ron L. Ensley grant from Gaston County Schools.[3]
References
edit- ^ "Staff Directory / Directory". www.gaston.k12.nc.us. Retrieved 2024-10-24.
- ^ Weaver, M. (2024, May 10). Melanie Weaver on linkedin: I am just about to end year 28 in Gaston County Schools and year 24 at...: 12 comments. Melanie Weaver on LinkedIn: I am just about to end year 28 in Gaston County Schools and year 24 at... | 12 comments. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/melanie-weaver-91b68a45_i-am-just-about-to-end-year-28-in-gaston-activity-7194749358553079808-CTTu
- ^ "Good News from Gaston County Schools, November". www.gaston.k12.nc.us. Retrieved 2024-10-24.