| Submission declined on 29 June 2024 by Garsh2 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 27 January 2024 by Mach61 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Blood Sugar Sex Magik. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you. Declined by Mach61 9 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 7 December 2023 by BuySomeApples (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by BuySomeApples 11 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 16 November 2023 by WikiOriginal-9 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by WikiOriginal-9 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 16 November 2023 by Robert McClenon (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Robert McClenon 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 14 November 2023 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 14 November 2023 by WikiOriginal-9 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by WikiOriginal-9 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 14 November 2023 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 12 months ago. | |
Comment: Article has not seen any real additions since its last submission. See previous comments for additional information. Garsh (talk) 03:49, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Per WP:NSONG,
If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created.
This rules out all but two sources for the purposes of ascertaining notability, namely the FAQ book, which I cannot access but appears promising, and songfacts, which I am not certain is a reliable source. Mach61 (talk) 00:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting. You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.This draft does not appear to indicate which of the musical notability criteria is satisfied. If at least one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the draft talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. If the subject satisfies general notability, please also indicate on the draft talk page or in AFC comments when resubmitting. You may ask for advice about the musical notability criteria at the Teahouse.Please ask for advice at the Teahouse or a music WikiProject before resubmitting. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
“Mellowship Slinky in B Major” is a song by the American rock band Red Hot Chili Peppers from their 1991 album Blood Sugar Sex Magik.
| "Mellowship Slinky in B Major" | |
|---|---|
| Song by Red Hot Chili Peppers | |
| from the album Blood Sugar Sex Magik | |
| Released | September 24, 1991 |
| Recorded | May - June 1991 |
| Studio | The Mansion |
| Genre | Rock |
| Length | 3:59 |
| Label | Warner Records |
| Songwriter(s) | Flea, John Frusciante, Anthony Kiedis, Chad Smith |
| Producer(s) | Rick Rubin |
The song has seen an inclusion on the compilation albums Plasma and the Studio Album Collection 1991-2011.[1] The song has never been played live in full length, but was partially played live two times.[2]
Background
editThe song drew inspiration from the German-American poet Charles Bukowski, as mentioned in the lyrics: "pick up my book, I read Bukowski."[3]
Lyrics
editThe lyrics talk about Anthony’s favorite things, while making a reference to the Jimi Hendrix hit Purple Haze. The line “I’ve got a non-stop ‘yo Swan’ hello chip” is a reference to Anthony Kiedis, who was often called “Antwan the Swan”[4]
Reception
editMost listeners said that the song was “not bad, but not great”[5] Modern Drummer said it was "nicely funky with only a bit of attitude"[6] MusicRader also said that "Flea's melodic, high-register opener gives way to yet another addictive sliding riff"[7]
Song key
editThere is a lot of debate about what key the song is actually in. Such as D Major. It was later confirmed that the song was in B Mixolydian, with a key signature of E major.[8]
References
edit- ^ Mellowship Slinky in B Major by Red Hot Chili Peppers - Track Info | AllMusic, retrieved 2023-12-02
- ^ "Red Hot Chili Peppers Live Archive". Red Hot Chili Peppers Live Archive. Retrieved 2023-12-02.
- ^ "The six best songs inspired by Charles Bukowski". faroutmagazine.co.uk. 2022-08-16. Retrieved 2024-08-05.
- ^ Red Hot Chili Peppers – Mellowship Slinky in B Major, retrieved 2024-01-27
- ^ Red Hot chilli Peppers - Uncensored on the Record. Coda Books Ltd. ISBN 978-1-78158-019-6.
- ^ Modern Drummer: MD. Modern Drummer Publications. 1993.
- ^ MusicRadar (2022-10-16). "9 of Flea's funkiest Red Hot Chili Peppers basslines". MusicRadar. Retrieved 2024-02-03.
- ^ Bogosian, Dan (2020-05-15). Red Hot Chili Peppers FAQ: All That's Left to Know About the World's Best-Selling Alternative Band. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-4930-5142-7.
External links
edit- Mellowship Slinky in B Major official audio on YouTube
- Mellowship Slinky in B Major on Allmusic
 | This 1990s song-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |