| Submission rejected on 25 August 2024 by MaxnaCarta (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by MaxnaCarta 2 months ago. Last edited by MaxnaCarta 2 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 21 February 2024 by Paul W (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by Paul W 9 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 3 September 2023 by Greenman (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Greenman 14 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 12 May 2023 by Alpha3031 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by Alpha3031 18 months ago. | |
Comment: Draft fails to describe why this person is notable. It reads like a CV or LinkedIn profile, not a biography of someone that has achieved notability - there are no references to significant (in-depth, extensive) coverage of him in reliable, independent, secondary sources with a reputation for accuracy and fact-checking (the existing citations are mainly routine or passing mentions in business publications). If there is no significant coverage, he has no place in Wikipedia. Paul W (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: There are both numerous unsourced statements, and insufficient sourcing to establish notability.Please also address WP:COI. (Previous COI concerns) Greenman (talk) 19:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Some of the new sources added might be independent but none of them
show significant coverage (not just passing mentions)
. It's better to have a few (three or four) very good sources than a lot of sources that verify one fact at a time, an article with only the latter type of source will almost never be accepted. Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:50, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: One thing to note is that we often use secondary sources to decide how much to write about parts of a subject, because they can be more general. For example, in a biographical article for person X there may be thing A and thing B to cover. If most secondary sources cover thing B in great detail and thing A significantly less, we would tend to follow the sources. This is not possible for closely associated sources that mostly just verify one or two very specific facts. There are other reasons that are just as, or even more important (otherwise we could just republish what the subject has written about themselves) but none of the sources seem to have significant enough coverage to fulfil that role well. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:15, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Michael W. Landsberg is an American financial advisor, wealth manager, certified financial planner[1], veteran investor, and Accredited Investment Fiduciary.
He serves as partner, chief executive officer, & Chief Investment Officer at Landsberg Bennett Private Wealth Management.[2][3]
Michael W. Landsberg | |
|---|---|
| File:MichaelLandsberg.jpeg Michael W. Landsberg | |
| Born | April 3, 1970 Hartford, Connecticut |
| Alma mater | Babson College, University of Florida |
Early life and education
Michael W. Landsberg was born on April 3, 1970, in Hartford, Connecticut. He attended Babson College, where he earned a Bachelor of Science degree with a major in management. He spent his senior year abroad studying Japanese language at Sophia University in Tokyo, Japan.
After completing his undergraduate studies, Landsberg pursued further education and obtained an MBA from the University of Florida in 1998.
Career
Michael W. Landsberg began his career in private wealth management as a sales professional at Morgan Stanley, where he worked from 1992 to 1994. In July 1994, Landsberg joined Merrill Lynch as a Certified Financial Planner. During his tenure at Merrill Lynch, he was promoted to the position of Senior Vice President and Portfolio Manager, serving the company for a total of 18 years.
In June 2012, Landsberg founded Landsberg Bennett Private Wealth Management, a boutique wealth management firm. He currently holds the positions of Principal, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Investment Officer at the firm, leveraging his extensive experience in wealth management and financial planning to guide the company's strategic direction and investment decisions.[4]
Media Appearances and Market Commentary
Landsberg frequently shares his market insights on major financial news platforms such as CNBC and Business Insider. He has been recognized for his views on earnings growth, Federal Reserve policies, and strategic investment approaches.[5][6]
Awards and Recognitions
Landsberg has been repeatedly listed in Forbes’ Best-in-State Wealth Advisors and Barron’s America’s Top Advisor Rankings for multiple years.[7]
References
edit- ^ "CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ Professional". CFP Board.
- ^ "Forbes Best-In-State Wealth Advisors 2024". Forbes.
- ^ "CNBC - Earnings growth is the 'name of the game' says CIO Michael Landsberg". CNBC. 7 July 2024.
- ^ "Business Insider - A top-ranked CIO shares 3 trades to hedge risk amid political upheaval and violence". Business Insider.
- ^ "CNBC - Earnings growth is the 'name of the game' says CIO Michael Landsberg". CNBC. 7 July 2024.
- ^ "Business Insider - A top-ranked CIO shares 3 trades to hedge risk amid political upheaval and violence". Business Insider.
- ^ "Forbes Best-In-State Wealth Advisors 2024". Forbes.