| Submission declined on 18 February 2022 by Hatchens (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 30 January 2022 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 2 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 29 January 2022 by اِفلاق (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by اِفلاق 2 years ago. | |
N. S. Uthayakumar | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Nationality | Indian |
| Occupation | Cinematographer |
| Years active | 2014–present |
N. S. Uthayakumar is an Indian cinematographer who predominantly works in the Tamil cinema.[citation needed] He is an alumnus of the College of Fine Arts, Chennai.[citation needed]
Career
editIn 2014, he made his debut as a cinematographer with the Aal (2014). The film was produced by Shoundaryan Pictures. It was an official remake of the Hindi Movie Aamir featuring Vidharth, and Hardika Shetty. He is notable for Sandamarutham[1], Kurangu Bommai and Kodiyil Oruvan[2]
Filmography
edit- Aal (2014)
- Sandamarutham (2015)
- Metro (2016)
- Kurangu Bommai (2017)
- Kodiyil Oruvan (2021)
References
edit- ^ "Sandamarutham Success Meet". filmibeat.
- ^ "Vijay Antony-Ananda Krishnan's upcoming political thriller goes on floors". cinemaexpress.