Submission declined on 8 November 2024 by Ca (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 27 October 2024 by OnlyNano (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by OnlyNano 29 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 27 October 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by SafariScribe 29 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 27 October 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 30 days ago.
| |
Comment: In addition, this source doesn't look reliable as it can be edited by anyone. Ca talk to me! 13:41, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Did some styling changes to get it to what I'd consider mainspace ready. Though, you've got me hooked on this subject, so I'll introduce some new sources if I find any :p OnlyNanotalk 17:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This article is additionally lacking readability. This article is hard to read clearly and the styling is inconsistent. OnlyNanotalk 16:35, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
| Brand | Centertel |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Nokia |
| First released | June 19, 1996 |
| Compatible networks | NMT-450i |
| Colors | Black Wood grain (SKH-171) Yellow (SKH-170) |
| Dimensions | 149 x 56 x 29 mm (with battery) |
| Weight | 250g |
| Storage | 97-number phone book 10 last dialed numbers |
| Battery | Slim 550 mAh NiMH 6.0V (BBH-1S) Extended 1500 mAh NiMH 6.0V (BBH-1H) |
| Charging | ACH-4E (fast) ACH-3E (slow) CHH-2 (desktop) |
The Nokia 450 (Centertel) was a mid-range analogue phone released by Nokia for Centertel, the NMT-450i network in Poland. The phone was launched on the 19th of June 1996.,[1] costing 2700 PLN.[2] At the time of launch it was the lightest Nokia phone for the NMT-450i network.[3]
Variants
editVariants of the Centertel Nokia 450
-
Nokia 450 THF-7P -
Nokia 450 THF-9P -
Nokia 450 VIP
The Nokia 450 (Centertel) could be purchased in three different variants:
- THF-7P model
- Features black casing with white Nokia and Centertel logos and SMS support.
- THF-9P model
- The main model features a black casing with white nokia logo and a larger, gold-colored Centertel logos. It support SMS out of the box.
- The Nokia 450 VIP (Very Important Phone) model has support for SMS and featured some minor changes in the menu. The casing imitated a wood grain pettern and had larger gold-colored Centertel logos. It was sold with the model number THF-9P.[2]
References
edit- ^ "Nokia - 450". www.mobilephonemuseum.com. Retrieved 2024-10-27.
- ^ a b "Telefonia komórkowa By BAKX - GSM, NMT, Centertel, Cityman, Talkman, PCS, BTS, NetMonitor, Nokia, Analog, Analogowe, Spectronic, Motorola, Siemens, Philips, Samsung, Nec, Aeg, Sagem, Benefon, Bosch, Maxon, Trium, Nortel, Panasonic, Sharp, Sony, Telital, Qualcom, Ericsson, Hagenuk, Beocom, Dancall, Alcatel". www.bakx.pl. Retrieved 2024-10-27.
- ^ "Nokia - 450". www.mobilephonemuseum.com. Retrieved 2024-10-27.
- ^ "Nokia 450 VIP". IT History Society. August 4, 2021.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.