Submission declined on 20 November 2023 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 19 November 2023 by Xegma (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Xegma 9 months ago.
|
- Comment: Firstly, the referencing is a bit of a mess. Please see WP:REFB for advice on correct referencing using inline citations and footnotes structured in the usual manner.Secondly, the sources are all primary, and therefore insufficient for establishing notability per WP:GNG. If special WP:NJOURNALS notability is being claimed instead, please provide clear evidence of how this journal meets one of the three criteria. Note that we need not just assertions, but actual evidence of this: eg. the draft states that this journal is indexed by Scopus, but I find nothing to support that; similarly, an impact factor of 3.1 is claimed, but this is only given by the publisher's own website (and even then, isn't actually cited, so I had to go and look for it myself).Especially given the earlier and fairly recent AfD discussion which resulted in deletion, for this draft to be accepted the journal must be shown to be clearly notable. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I can see this AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Occupational Health Science (journal) was deleted last time. Xegma(talk) 06:48, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: This was closed as Delete less than 10 months ago in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Occupational_Health_Science_(2nd_nomination) and in that AfD, you can see all the previous iterations of AfDs on this journal. In the older AfD, there was canvassing issue. Graywalls (talk) 06:27, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, the journal was deleted ten months ago; I, however, recently became aware of the journal's higher impact factor. Over the six years of its existence, the impact factor grew to 3.1. I also read a complaint about the impact factor on my talk page, namely, that the impact factor comes from the journal itself. That complaint is off the mark. To find out the impact of any journal, an editor has to go to the publisher's journal site. That is what I did. That would apply to the journal Occupational Health Psychology or to Psychological Review. I have no reason to believe that Springer would falsify the impact factor.
- I also read a complaint about the style of the references. The references are in the style of the American Psychological Association. WP allows editors to use the style of the discipline to which the topic is aligned. Occupational Health Science, although trans-disciplinary, is mostly aligned with the discipline known as occupational health psychology and is supported by the Society for Occupational Health Psychology. The APA style of the references is, therefore, satisfactory.
- Regarding primary vs. secondary sources, Tetrick et al.'s Handbook is a secondary source. The National Library of Medicine is a secondary source, a document that informs readers what journals are indexed by PubMed and Medline. The entry for the journal should be maintained. Give it time, the entry will grow.
- I think it is premature to take a hatchet to the entry after the impact factor shows that the journal has grown in significance. Iss246 (talk) 20:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Randykitty:, I see you're the AfD nominator in the AfDs in the prior versions of this article. I've previously edited on SOHP article which was the redirect target of one of the earlier iterations of article on this journal. This draft was submitted for creation again and the creator indicates "impact factor grew to 3.1". Maybe you could comment if there's been development in the journal suggesting elevated notability since the AfD in March? Graywalls (talk) 04:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think it is premature to take a hatchet to the entry after the impact factor shows that the journal has grown in significance. Iss246 (talk) 20:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Discipline | Occupational health psychology, Occupational health |
---|---|
Language | English |
Edited by | Robert R. Sinclair |
Publication details | |
History | 2017–present |
Publisher | |
Frequency | Quarterly |
3.1 (2022) | |
Standard abbreviations | |
ISO 4 | Occup. Health Sci. |
Indexing | |
ISSN | 2367-0134 (print) 2367-0142 (web) |
OCLC no. | 1012494848 |
Links | |
Occupational Health Science (OHES) is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that covers research on occupational health.[1] It was established in 2017. According to Journal Impact,[2] OHES publishes research on public, environmental, and occupational health. The journal is also indexed by PubMed and Medline[3] and PsycInfo.[4] In 2023, there were more than 135,000 downloads of journal articles.[5] The Occupational Health Psychology–Total Worker Health program housed at Portland State University[6] identified OHES as one of the resources applicable to the discipline occupational health psychology. Springer Nature publishes the journal, which is sponsored by the Society for Occupational Health Psychology. The editor-in-chief and founding editor is Robert R. Sinclair (Clemson University).
OHES is peer reviewed. Coverage includes empirical and theoretical articles on psychological and behavioral components of occupational health.[7] Among the topics covered are physical health, psychological well-being, and worker safety.[1] Published papers are addressed to both researchers and practitioners in applied psychology, occupational safety, occupational medicine, industrial hygiene, public health, occupational nursing, and epidemiology.[8]
Indexed by
editSee also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b Tetrick, L.E., Fisher, G.G., Ford, M.T., & Quick, J.C. (2023). Handbook of occupational health psychology (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
- ^ Journal Impact. Occupational Health Science. Accessed Nov. 22, 2023 [1]
- ^ a b c National Library of Medicine [2]
- ^ a b American Psychological Association [3]
- ^ Springer Publishing [4]
- ^ Occupational Health Psychology-Total Worker Health[5]
- ^ Cunningham, C. J., & Jennings Black, K. (2021). Essentials of occupational health psychology. Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
- ^ Occupational Health Science [[6]] Retrieved Nov. 2023
- ^ Research.com Occupational Health Science [7]
- ^ "Occupational Health Science".
External links
editCategory:Occupational safety and health journals Category:Springer Science+Business Media academic journals Category:Quarterly journals Category:Publications established in 2017 Category:English-language journals
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.