Submission declined on 23 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 25 March 2024 by Crunchydillpickle (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Crunchydillpickle 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 25 March 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 8 months ago. |
Submission declined on 25 March 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Paul D'Amato, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 8 months ago. |
- Comment: Doesn't meet WP:CREATIVE. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:53, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will need to be disambiguated for acceptance.If this draft is accepted, the disambiguation page will need to be edited. Either an entry will need to be added, or an entry will need to be revised. The disambiguation page for the primary name is Paul D'Amato (disambiguation). Robert McClenon (talk) 01:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Like the previous reviewer said, Wikipedia articles should not have long bulleted lists of exhibitions. Paul D'Amato has some media coverage in reliable secondary sources, such as the Chicago Tribune [1], and therefore might be worthy of a Wikipedia article, but this draft is overly detailed and incorrectly formatted so I cannot accept it. Please let me know if you have any questions. Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Wikiepdia is WP:NOT a database or CV of published works. Trim the selection to notable instances; then ensure the draft article is an article that reads like a biography supported by WP:Inline citations, and not an advertisment. Borderline G11 candidate. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:07, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Paul D'Amato | |
---|---|
Occupation(s) | Photographer and Teacher |
Website | pauldamato |
Paul D'Amato (born 1956) is a American photographer and author based in Chicago. His work has focused on the depiction of urban environments, and he is represented by Stephen Daiter Gallery..[1]
He lives in Chicago, Illinois. He is specialized in portrait photography and documentary photography and he is a professor at Columbia College Chicago.[2] By 2006, D'Amato was "the winner of a Guggenheim fellowship".[3]
He one of the founders and editors of SKYLARK EDITIONS,[4] a non-profit publishing project based in Chicago.
Early life, education, and career
editBorn in Boston, Massachusetts, D'Amato He received an M.F.A. from the Yale School of Art in 1985.[5] In 1989, D'Amato taught a senior photography class for the Portland School of Art.[6] In 1990 he premiered an exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art in New York.[5]
A 1996 review of a four-artist exhibition in Brunswick featuring D'Amato praised his "ability to document without surrendering his aesthetic insights".[7]
In 2006, he published Barrio: Photographs From Chicago's Pilsen and Little Village, which was reviewed by the Chicago Tribune.[3] The book focused on "visits to the primarily Mexican neighborhoods of Pilsen and Little Village from 1988 to 2002", and the Tribune noted that D'Amato avoided falling into urban or ghetto clichés "by showing new variations", and that D'Amato described a "near-addiction to photographing a particular street gang", until he was dissuaded by the prospect of "witnessing planned, violent crimes".[3]
He published the books Here/Still/Now with Kehrer Verlag[8] and We Shall with DePaul Art Museum.[9]
Recognition
editHe received many grants and awards, like The Robert Mapplethorpe Foundation Grant in 2013, the Book Prize: Traditional Prize Winner, by Lucie Foundation, in Los Angeles, in 2018; the Best Photography Books of the Year, by PDN Photo Annual, in New York, in 2018. He was finalist for the Portrait Competition, by Lensculture, in Amsterdam, Netherlands, in 2018[10]
His photographs are part of many important public collections, like that of the Art Institute of Chicago, in Chicago, Illinois,[11] and the DePaul University Art Museum, also in Chicago, the Federal Reserve Bank in Chicago, the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, New York, New York, the Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York.[12]
He has some media coverage in many magazines and newspapers, such as the Chicago Tribune.[13]
References
edit- ^ "Stephen Daiter website". www.stephendaitergallery.com.
- ^ "Paul D'Amato". Columbia College Chicago.
- ^ a b c Carolyn Alessio, "Panoramic views of Mexican and Chicano culture", Chicago Tribune (November 26, 2006), p. 14-7.
- ^ "SKYLAR". www.skylareditions.org.
- ^ a b John Zeaman, "Cloudy and cool Nineties conditions", The Hackensack Record (November 16, 1990), The Record section, p. 15.
- ^ Judith Harper, "[Biddleford sights captured on film]", Biddleford Journal Tribune (January 27, 1989), p. 3C.
- ^ Philip Isaacson, "'P' word inescapable at Icon, where process is paramount", Portland Press Herald (December 22, 1996), p. 3E.
- ^ "KEHRER". Kehrer Verlag.
- ^ "DEPAULARTMUSEUM". www.depaul.edu.
- ^ "SKYLAR". www.lensculture.com.
- ^ "ARTINSTITUTEOFCHICAGO". Art Institute of Chicago. 25 March 2024.
- ^ "MOMA". MOMA.
- ^ "CHIGACOTRIBUNE". www.chicagotribune.com. 6 July 2007.
External links
edit- "Paul D'Amato website". www.pauldamato.com.
- "Mutual Art". www.mutualart.com.
- "DODHO". www.dodho.com.
- "LandscapeStories". www.landscapestories.net.
- "NPG". npg.si.edu/. 12 April 2016.