| Submission declined on 26 June 2024 by Ratnahastin (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 23 March 2022 by HitroMilanese (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by HitroMilanese 2 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 June 2016 by SwisterTwister (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SwisterTwister 8 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 24 May 2016 by RegistryKey (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by RegistryKey 8 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 23 May 2016 by 78.26 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by 78.26 8 years ago. | |
Comment: Does not appear to meet WP:NARTIST currently. Hitro talk 19:42, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: As unless his works have been permanently collected by major art museums, there's simply nothing currently convincing for notability. SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: As previously mentioned when your article was declined before, you need to find more sources than just local Houston-based coverage of this individual in order to establish notability. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 07:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Good use of inline citation, thank you, but you need more than local press coverage to indicate general notability. Has anyone outside of Houston taken notice of this artist? 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 03:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 |
Phillip Pyle, II is a visual artist, graphic designer, and photographer based in Houston, Texas. His primary interests are race, humor, advertising, sports, and popular culture. His art has been covered by CNN,Texas Monthly, the Houston Chronicle, Art in America, and the Houston Press.[1][2][3][4][5] His works have been exhibited at the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston, University Museum at Texas Southern University, The Museum of African American Culture, Project Row Houses, Art League Houston, the Blaffer Art Museum, and the FotoFest Biennial.[5][6][7][8][9]
Career
editIn 2013, Phillip Pyle II and Robert Hodge created "Beauty Box," a social sculpture.[2][10] They used furniture from thrift stores to recreate "a living room more or less in the image of their own grandparents' homes."[2] Pyle "wanted people to consider their own lives, their own history, their own grandmother's keen decorating sense as worthy of being declared art."[2] In 2014, they created an exhibition titled "The Black Guys" at the Art League, an homage to the Art Guys.[2] In 2015, Pyle's exhibition, "Black Panther Party Power" appeared at Fresh Arts, where he cast prominent members of the Black Panther Party as superheroes.[3][11][12] In 2021, Pyle's Broken Obelisk Elbows appeared at the 2021 Texas Biennial.[1] According to Texas Monthly, Broken Obelisk Elbows, "a satirical proposal for a public art intervention," was "the key to the entire show."[13] The work provided "an ironic, satirical commentary on who gets to do public monuments."[13] In 2024, his series "Forgotten Struggle," which featured photographs of the Civil Rights Movement edited so that the protestors are carrying blank signs, appeared at the FotoFest Biennial.[5]
References
edit- ^ a b Petty, Kathleen (August 2021). "Texas Biennial Exhibition Lands in San Antonio". San Antonio Magazine.
- ^ a b c d e Binkovitz, Leah (December 13, 2014). "24 hours at a bus stop: It's art". Houston Chronicle.
- ^ a b "Events Today".
- ^ Arning, Bill; Arning, Bill (May 23, 2016). "Up Close: Houston Loves Eccentrics".
- ^ a b c Palumbo, Jacqui (March 8, 2024). "What happens when history is erased? An artist edits Civil Rights images to eerie effect". CNN.
- ^ "Houston Rockets x CAMH". MutualArt.
- ^ Kelly, By Sam González. "Houston Artists Aim to Preserve History of Third Ward with Exhibition at Texas Southern's University Museum". Houston Chronicle.
- ^ "Session G". Art League Houston.
- ^ "Phillip Pyle II". Blaffer Art Museum. Retrieved 2024-05-01.
- ^ "Welcome Home: Houston Artists Transform Empty Lot into Third Ward Living Room". July 11, 2013.
- ^ Bishop, Amy (September 25, 2015). "Houston Artist Pays Tribute to Black Panther Party With 1980s Cartoons". Houston Public Media.
- ^ http://www.artshound.com/event/detail/441936607/Phillip_Pyle_II_Black_Panther_Party_Power
- ^ a b Agresta, Michael (September 8, 2021). "Can a Big, Texas-Wide Survey of Contemporary Art Tell Us Where We Go From Here?". Texas Monthly.