Submission declined on 18 August 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 2 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 6 months ago.
|
- Comment: I'm still not seeing sufficient evidence of notability per WP:ORG. The first source cited makes only a passing mention of this outfit. The second one does provide decent coverage, but isn't enough. I've no idea what the third source is, or what it says about this subject (please see WP:OFFLINE for advice on citing offline sources). There are also two works listed under 'Sources' (one of which has hardly any bibliographical detail provided), but there's no indication of what if anything they've contributed to this draft, or what if any coverage they provide of the subject. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The title of this draft either has been disambiguated or will require disambiguation if accepted.If this draft is accepted, a hatnote will need to be added to the primary page to refer to this page. If there is already a hatnote on the primary page, please review whether a disambiguation page is in order instead.The primary page is Pro aris et focis. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:37, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Pro Aris et Focis | |
---|---|
Leader | Jan-Baptist Verlooy and Jan Frans Vonck |
Founded | 1780s |
Succeeded by | Vonckists |
Ideology | Belgian nationalism Liberalism Republicanism |
Political position | Left-wing (by the standards of the time) |
Pro Aris et Focis (Latin: "For Altar and Hearth", sometimes rendered as "For God and Country") was a secret society in Brussels (then part of the Austrian Netherlands) in 1789, which prepared for the Brabantine Revolution against Emperor Joseph II. It was led by the lawyers Jan-Baptist Verlooy and Jan Frans Vonck.[1][2]
The society would ally themselves with the more conservative Statist faction to form a united block against the Habsburg monarchy.
During the Brabant Revolution, the society formed the core of the revolution's progressive Vonckist faction, which would later be purged by the Statist faction following the proclamation of the United Belgian States.[1]
Ideology
editThe society and its Vonckist succesors advocated for the independence of the Southern Netherlands (now Belgium) from Habsburg rule, and held similar principles as those of the contemporary French Revolution. Advocating for popular sovereignty, democracy, the reduction or total abolition of the privileges of the first and second estates, as well as other broadly Enlightenment beliefs.
Most did not want to change anything about the status of the Catholic Church, though anti-clerical factions did exist. The most prominent being led by the Vonckist lawyer Charles Lambert d'Outrepont.[3]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b Pappas, Dale (August 2012). "Belgium from Revolution to the War of the Sixth Coalition 1789-1814".
- ^ Polasky, Janet (16 May 2012). "The Brabant Revolution, "a Revolution in Historiographical Perception"". Journal of Belgian History.
- ^ Encarta-encyclopedie Winkler Prins (1993-2002).
Sources
edit- Judge, Jane. The United States of Belgium
- Blom, J. C. H. Lamberts, E., eds. (2006). History of the Low Countries. New York [u.a.]: Berghahn Books. p. 293.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.