Submission declined on 9 December 2024 by CanonNi (talk). Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
The Quadlemma is a conceptual framework in cryptocurrency design, extending the traditional blockchain trilemma by adding privacy/confidentiality as a fourth dimension. This term was coined by Cyber Henry of the Xelis project to address the trade-offs faced by blockchain systems striving to optimize decentralization, scalability, security, and privacy.[1]
Background: The Blockchain Trilemma The blockchain trilemma, popularized by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin, describes the inherent challenges in optimizing the following three properties in a blockchain:
1.) Decentralization– Ensuring no single entity controls the system.
2.) Scalability- Achieving high throughput and low latency for widespread adoption.
3.) Security-' Guaranteeing resistance against attacks and safeguarding user assets.
The trilemma asserts that improving two of these properties often comes at the expense of the third. [2]
Adding Privacy:The Quadlemma
Cyber Henry proposed that modern cryptocurrency systems must also prioritize privacy/confidentiality to achieve practical usability, especially in applications requiring financial or transactional discretion. This addition creates the Quadlemma, which outlines the need to balance four competing attributes:
1.) Decentralization 2.) Scalability 3.) Security 4.) Privacy/Confidentiality
In traditional blockchain systems, enhancing privacy (e.g., through zero-knowledge proofs or ring signatures) often impacts scalability or decentralization. Conversely, scaling solutions like sharding or Layer 2 technologies can reduce privacy guarantees by introducing additional layers of data exposure.[3]
Implications of the Quadlemma:
The inclusion of privacy/confidentiality recognizes that anonymity and data security are not optional in many cryptocurrency use cases, such as:
Financial transactions: Protecting sensitive financial information from public exposure. Corporate or governmental applications: Ensuring confidential data transmission. Regulatory compliance: Balancing user privacy with necessary oversight.
The Quadlemma acknowledges that optimizing all four dimensions simultaneously is a significant challenge, pushing blockchain developers to innovate new solutions that minimize trade-offs. [4]
Applications in Xelis: The term Quadlemma was coined in the context of Xelis, a cryptocurrency project that aims to integrate instant transactions, scalability, and privacy without sacrificing decentralization. Xelis utilizes advanced cryptographic techniques, such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZK Proofs) and Homomorphic Encryption, to reconcile the demands of the Quadlemma.
Challenges and Criticism: Critics argue that adding privacy to the framework complicates the already difficult task of achieving the trilemma's goals. Others suggest that privacy is a subset of security rather than an independent property. However, proponents of the Quadlemma emphasize that privacy deserves recognition as a separate dimension due to its unique technical and ethical implications.
References
edit- ^ Henry, Cyber. "XELIS: A High-Performance BlockDAG for Private, Instant, and Scalable Decentralized Transactions and Applications". Retrieved 8 December 2024.
- ^ Nakai, T.; Sakurai, A.; Hironaka, S.; Shudo, K. (2024). "A Formulation of the Trilemma in Proof of Work Blockchain". IEEE Access. 12: 80559–80578. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3410025. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
- ^ Mind, Alien. "Privacy in crypto: is it still possible in 2024?". SwapSpace. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
- ^ Henry, Cyber. "The Cryptocurrency Trilemma and Its Evolution into a Quadlemma". Medium. Retrieved 8 December 2024.