| Submission rejected on 28 September 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Bonadea 32 days ago. Last edited by Kuru 15 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 27 September 2024 by Cocobb8 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Cocobb8 33 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 4 September 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bonadea 56 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 28 August 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bonadea 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 24 August 2024 by GrabUp (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by GrabUp 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 23 August 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Utopes 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Despite very specific information about which sources are inappropriate, no reliable sources have been added, several non-reliable and self-published sources have been added, and it is obvious that the subject is not (yet) notable. bonadea contributions talk 18:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The previous issues have still not been fixed. Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 19:48, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please read the previous comment. All the inappropriate sources from last time are still there, with three new, equally inappropriate ones, added. bonadea contributions talk 10:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: None of the sources in the draft is a reliable, independent, or secondary source. All references using spotify, amazon, plyric, shazam, primevideo, jiosaavn, iheart, pagalworld, music.163, youtube, discogs, and apple music must be removed, as should the greengold.tv link which doesn't even mention Ram. bonadea contributions talk 10:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
R.K. Ram | |
|---|---|
 R.K. Ram in a music video SAD Without You, 2021 | |
| Background information | |
| Origin | New Delhi, Delhi, India |
| Genres | |
| Occupations |
|
| Instrument | FLstudio |
| Years active | 2019-2022 |
| Labels |
|
R.K.Ram (Radio Edit) and Lo-fi artist. In 2022 Raj made Krishna's Eternal Love (Radio Edit) a radio edit version of a original song[1] from the movie[2] Krishna-Kans vadh[3]. which was telecasted on Cartoon Network India.[4] Krishna's Eternal Love ranked on #155 iTunes Asia's charts top 200, 2024-09-27[5]
Discography
editExtended plays
edit| Title | EP details |
|---|---|
| Na jaa Bewafa - Freestyle (archived) |
|
| Char Dino Ka Pyar - Freestyle (archived) |
|
| Devil Beat (archived) |
|
| Dil Tod Ke (feat. Siddyy) |
|
| GANGSTA Rhythm |
|
| Alone (archived) |
|
| SAD Without You (archived) |
|
| dekha ek khwab to ye silsile hue (archived) |
|
| Krishna's eternal love |
|
| Acha Ji Mai Haari Chalo Maan Jao Na (Radio Edit) - Single |
|
Singles
editAs Radio Edit artist
edit| Title | Year | Album |
|---|---|---|
| Monsoon Love (archived) | 2020 | Monsoon Love |
| Bird Beats (archived) | 2020 | Bird Beats |
| Dil Tod Ke | 2021 | Dil Tod Ke |
| Want to be alone | 2021 | Alone |
| Krishna's eternal love | 2022 | Krishna's eternal love |
| Acha Ji Mai Haari Chalo Maan Jao Na | 2022 | Acha Ji Mai Haari Chalo Maan Jao Na |
References
edit- ^ Green Gold TV - Official Channel (2012-09-15). Krishna Eternal Love Song. Retrieved 2024-09-28 – via YouTube.
- ^ "'Krishna' casts spell over Harry Potter!". The Economic Times. 2007-10-14. ISSN 0013-0389. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
- ^ "Krishna Kans Vadh". www.india.com. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
- ^ "GreenGold`s Kans Vadh slated for Sep 4 on CN -". www.animationxpress.com. Retrieved 2024-10-06.
- ^ "Devilraj Chart Positions on Spotify, Apple Music and Other Streaming Services". web.archive.org. 2024-09-27. Retrieved 2024-09-29.
External links
edit