| Submission rejected on 19 September 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Bonadea 2 months ago. Last edited by Citation bot 15 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 11 July 2024 by Myrealnamm (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Myrealnamm 4 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 18 May 2024 by CanonNi (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CanonNi 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 11 February 2024 by The Herald (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by The Herald 9 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 22 December 2023 by Lewcm (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Lewcm 10 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 18 December 2023 by JBW (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by JBW 11 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 17 November 2023 by WikiOriginal-9 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by WikiOriginal-9 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 7 November 2023 by WikiOriginal-9 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by WikiOriginal-9 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 20 September 2023 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by DoubleGrazing 14 months ago. | |
Comment: I'm afraid there is simply no real claim to notability here, and comparing this draft to the version that was draftified after the article was deleted in AfD (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabinarayan Acharya) shows that the reasons for deleting it still apply: Acharya does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPROF, which are the relevant notability guidelines. It's been almost a year since the deletion discussion, and nothing new has emerged, so this must be the end of the line for this draft. bonadea contributions talk 15:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Adding more secondary sources that makes the person notable would be helpful to making to draft accepted. Myrealnamm (💬pros · ✏️cons) 16:33, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: 0 improvement since last decline. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 03:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please avoid citation overkill. To meet notability guidelines you should find reliable, secondary sources with significant coverage. Thanks Lewcm Talk to me! 17:13, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Since the last time this draft was submitted for review, and declined because its references did not demonstrate notability, there has been just one reference added, and that one is published by an organisation of which Rabinarayan Acharya is the director. The fact that an organisation publishes information about its own director is no evidence of notability. JBW (talk) 20:39, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Not quite enough independent significan coverage or hits im scholar WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 06:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 | The topic of this draft may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies. (September 2023) |
Prof. Vaidya Rabinarayan Acharya | |
|---|---|
 Prof. Vaidya Rabinarayan Acharya, DG, CCRAS, delivering the keynote address during 5th Global Ayurveda Fest 2023 at Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala | |
| Born | 26 February 1967 Nalibar, Jagatsinghpur, Odhisha |
| Nationality | Indian |
| Education | BSc (Hons), BAMS (Hons), MD (Ayurveda), Ph D (Ayurveda) |
| Alma mater | Gujarat University |
| Occupation(s) | Director General, CCRAS Since 28 Feb 2022 |
| Organization | Ministry of AYUSH |
| Website | http://ccras.nic.in/ |
Prof. Vaidya Rabinarayan Acharya (birth date – 26 February 1967) is an Indian Ayurveda Physician. He is appointed as the Director General of CCRAS, Ministry of AYUSH, New Delhi.[1] [2]He was born in Nalibar Village, Jagatsinghpur District, in Odhisa. His fathers name is Late Shri Parikshita Acharya. Prof Acharya is the first from Odhisa to become a head of a central government organization under the Ministry of Ayush. He was temporary advisor to WHO[3][4][5]
Prof Acharya completed his BSc (Hons. Botany) and BAMS (Hons) from Utkal University, Bhubaneshwar. He completed his post graduation in MD (Ayurveda), Dravyaguna and Ph.D in Ayurveda (Dravyaguna) from Gujarat University. He also have a PG Diploma in Bioethics.[6][4]
References
edit- ^ "Prof RN Acharya appointed Director General of CCRAS". The New Indian Express. 21 February 2022. Retrieved 2023-11-01.
- ^ "Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences Launches "PRAGATI-2024", an initiative to shape the future of Ayurved". Government of India Press Release.
- ^ a b "Prof RN Acharya appointed Director General of CCRAS". The New Indian Express. 21 Feb 2022. p. 1.
- ^ a b "Rabinarayan Acharya | Gujarat Ayurved University,Jamnagar - Academia.edu". ayurveduniversity.academia.edu. Retrieved 2023-07-08.
- ^ Chakraborty, Raja; Sen, Saikat (2023-07-24). Practice and Re-emergence of Herbal Medicine. Bentham Science Publishers. ISBN 978-981-5080-42-1.
- ^ "CV Rabinarayan Acharya | PDF | Ayurveda | Plants". Scribd. Retrieved 2023-07-08.
- ^ Gandhi, Yashika; Kumar, Ravi; Grewal, Jyotika; Rawat, Hemant; Mishra, Sujeet K.; Kumar, Vijay; Shakya, Santosh K.; Jain, Vipin; Babu, Gajji; Sharma, Preeti; Singh, Arjun; Singh, Ravindra; Acharya, Rabinarayan (2022-10-01). "Advances in anti-inflammatory medicinal plants and phytochemicals in the management of arthritis: A comprehensive review". Food Chemistry Advances. 1: 100085. doi:10.1016/j.focha.2022.100085. ISSN 2772-753X.
- ^ Agrawal, Dinesh Chandra; Dhanasekaran, Muralikrishnan (2021-01-21). Medicinal Herbs and Fungi: Neurotoxicity vs. Neuroprotection. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-981-334-141-8.