Submission declined on 24 June 2024 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 23 June 2024 by A09 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Declined by A09 5 months ago.This submission has now been cleaned of the above-noted copyright violation and its history redacted by an administrator to remove the infringement. If re-submitted (and subsequent additions do not reintroduce copyright problems), the content may be assessed on other grounds. |
Reincarnisation is a term used in anthropology to refer to the process of upward social mobility in Bhutanese society by which a Buddhist master is reborn as a reincarnate Lama tulku in a family of small (chung) or medium (ding) group. This process, in addition to economic and political gains, allows the family members attain the big (che) category through the affiliation to higher divinities manifested in the form of the tulku. It was first used by a Bhutanese anthropologist Kelzang T. Tashi while studying social stratification and social mobility in Bhutan.[1]
According to Kelzang T. Tashi, recarnisation is distinct from reincarnation, in that every being in culturally Tibetan Buddhist worlds is believed to be a reincarnation of a particular being, such as an animal, an ordinary person, a worldly deity, or an insect, but rarely a reincarnate Buddhist master, and even more rarely Buddha or Bodhisattva. Unlike reincarnisation, reincarnation does not always result in higher status or upward social mobility.
Reincarnisation is not restricted to the system of rebirths of high Buddhist masters, as ordinary monks may also be regarded as emanations of some Buddhists masters at some point in their lives after their spiritual accomplishment and subsequently may be reborn as a tulku.
Reincarnisation functions similarly to Sanskritisation, as both are concerned with achieving upward mobility into higher social hierarchy. However, unlike in Sanskritisation, mere adoption and emulation of Buddhist literature and rituals by people do not always lead to upward mobility, unless they are recognised as tulkus or have attained spiritual realisation.
References
edit- ^ Tashi, Kelzang T (February 2021) [11 February 2021]. "The (un)Changing Karma: Pollution Beliefs, Social Stratification and Reincarnisation in Bhutan" (PDF). Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology. 22 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1080/14442213.2021.1884125.