A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (October 2024) |
Submission declined on 21 July 2024 by Twinkle1990 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 25 April 2024 by Crunchydillpickle (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Crunchydillpickle 6 months ago. |
- Comment: much of their major contribution is increasing his publication prominence by shoehorning his own published materials into various articles.Graywalls (talk) 17:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Because it's biography, remove all primary sources ad only secondary and reliable sources only. Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:25, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Hey Richardatlarge! Thanks for the submission. The main reason I can't accept this as-is is that is lacks in-line citations. You should have a citation after every major piece of info. I added some citation needed templates to show how frequently you should be adding citations (I stopped after the first section since I figured you'd get the gist). My other concern is that Richard DeGrandpre is on the border of notability standards for people (per WP:BIO). I added a few newspapers.com sources you might want to use, but you'd really need an articles from reputable source that are focused on Richard DeGrandpre, not just articles that mention him. I did see media coverage of the book Ritalin Nation that might be close to [WP:NBOOK]]. And lastly, since I noticed your username contains Richard and you share interests [1] with the article subject, I'm letting you know that writing autobiographies is strongly discouraged — more on that in WP:AUTOBIO. Let me know if you have any questions! Thanks, Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 01:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Richard DeGrandpre (born 1964) is an American psychologist, writer, ceramicist, and horticulturalist who lives in New Zealand.
Biography and Education
editDeGrandpre was born in Cutbank, Montana, and raised in Helena.[1] He attended the University of Montana for his B.S. in psychology (1987),[2][3] where he also received a commission as an officer in the US Army Reserves.[4] He earned a M.S. in experimental psychology from Auburn University (1989),[5] then a Ph.D. in psychopharmacology from the University of Vermont (1992).[6] His dissertation investigated environmental factors in drug taking and established the first human experimental demonstration of a Giffen good.[7]
After earning his doctorate, he completed a post-doc as a fellow of the National Institute on Drug Abuse.[8] He went on teach before becoming an independent scholar, authoring papers and books in the social sciences, sciences, and the humanities. He was also a senior editor for three years at Adbusters magazine in Vancouver, BC.[9] While at Adbusters, he wrote extensively there, and elsewhere, on the overreach of the pharmaceutical industry with regards to psychiatric drugs.[10]
Early Career
editDeGrandpre was a visiting professor in the Department of Psychology at the College of Charleston from 1995-1996 before teaching as an Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology at St. Michael's College in Vermont (1996-1999).[11] During this period he wrote several essays, magazine pieces, and opinion editorials.[12][13][14][15] One essay was "A science of meaning," which outlined a behavioral mechanism underlying meaning making, published in the American Psychologist.[16] Another essay was "Drugs: In the care of the self," which was published with Ed White in the interdisciplinary journal Common Knowledge.[17]
DeGrandpre wrote the first of three nonfiction books[18] during this time, each of which focused on the foucauldian notion of "technologies of the self," Ritalin Nation.[19][20][21][22][23] The book, which also appeared in German,[24][25] presented an early critique of the mass acceptance of using psychiatric drugs for everyday pediatric problems.[26] Tearing down the myth of hyperactivity as a medical disorder, DeGrandpre replaced it with a theory of sensory adaptation and addiction that, culture wide, has led to a transformation of human consciousness.[27] A critic for the New York Times, Herbert Muschamp, applied DeGrandpre's cultural critique to a show at the Museum of Modern Art (Sept. 19, 1999), writing:
If the show were a story, the headline might read, Housing Starts on the Rise in Ritalin Nation. The Un-Private House is a good illustration of what Richard J. DeGrandpre, the author of Ritalin Nation, calls rapid-fire culture, a civilization hooked on constant sensory stimulation.[28]
The two books that followed Ritalin Nation were Digitopia[29] and The Cult of Pharmacology.[30] The first extended DeGrandpre's critique of rapid-fire culture to the emerging digital age.[31][32] The book was published as part of an experimental and ultimately unsuccessful series of ebooks by Random House.[33][34]
The final of the three books was The Cult of Pharmacology, exploring "how America became the world's most troubled drug culture" -- the subtitle of the book.[30] The book explores the transformation of America's relationship with psychoactive drugs from a benign one to one of confusion and chaos.[35][36] The book delves into the widespread belief that drugs are inherently good or bad, which DeGrandpre calls "pharmacologism," and how this belief has influenced drug regulation and perception.[37] He also highlights the double standard in drug policy, where some drugs are heavily regulated while others, like legal drugs, including alcohol, are not.[38]
Challenging the notion that drugs have a fixed, inherent nature by emphasizing the role of social context in shaping drug meaning and effects (pharmacologicalism), DeGrandpre explores the idea that culturally-constructed beliefs about drugs are often as powerful in shaping drug outcomes as the drugs themselves.[39][40][41] Applied to addiction, DeGrandpre turns to the work by the American sociologist Alfred R. Lindesmith. Lindesmith showed for example that regular users of opiates often fail to become habitual addicts. "The advantage of attributing the origin of addiction, not to a single event, but to a series of events, [implies] that addiction is established in a learning or "ecological" process extending over a period of time."[42]
For DeGrandpre and Lindesmith both, this process of meaning-making unfolds in a cultural context, the power of which is greatly underestimated, both in the sciences and the wider culture. DeGrandpre writes in The Cult of Pharmacology,
...the opiate user must first experience withdrawal (a physical phenomenon), he or she must develop a concern over the withdrawal experience as such (a cognitive phenomenon), and then he or she must engage in drug use, taking opiates repeatedly to eliminate or avoid opiate withdrawal (a behavioral phenomenon). A breakdown in any part of this bio-psycho-social circuit can keep a pattern of dependent opiate use from emerging.
Notable reviewers of DeGrandpre's books include Herbert Muschamp,[28] David Courtwright,[43] Peter Kramer,[44] and Malcolm Gladwell.[45]
Later Career
editAfter leaving Vancouver, DeGrandpre immigrated to New Zealand, where he now lives.[46]
After taking up glass blowing while living in Vancouver, DeGrandpre shifted to ceramics, working under the tutelage of Renton Murray.[47] His work is sold under the name, MonsterPots.[48] He also began to cultivate and sell bonsai trees and other potted plants, which were sold in a boutique plantshop he designed called Monstera.[49][50][51]
References
edit- ^ "The Independent-Record from Helena, Montana". 30 May 1982.
- ^ "UM honor roll". The Independent-Record. 16 January 1986. p. 9.
- ^ "Class Notes - Winter 2000 Montanan".
- ^ https://scholarworks.umt.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=10495&context=newsreleases
- ^ DeGrandpre, R. J. (1989) Instruction following in a social context [M.S.] Psychology
- ^ DeGrandpre, R. J. (1992) Effects of income manipulations on drug self-administration in human cigarette smokers [Ph. D.] Psychology
- ^ DeGrandpre, R. J.; Bickel, W. K.; Rizvi, S. A.; Hughes, J. R. (1993). "Effects of income on drug choice in humans". Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. 59 (3): 483–500. doi:10.1901/jeab.1993.59-483. PMC 1322132. PMID 8315366.
- ^ "The Cult of Pharmacology".
- ^ https://www.alternet.org/2001/06/ritalin_just_say_no
- ^ "The Lilly Suicides".
- ^ https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/R-J-DeGrandpre-39246933
- ^ "My Genes Made Me do It | Psychology Today New Zealand".
- ^ Degrandpre, Richard J. (1999). "J<SCP>ust</SCP> C<SCP>ause</SCP>?". The Sciences. 39 (2): 14–18. doi:10.1002/j.2326-1951.1999.tb03421.x.
- ^ "Opinion | the good, the bad and the addictive". The New York Times. 29 March 2007.
- ^ "Surgeon General's Report is Laudable but Misleading". Los Angeles Times. 20 December 1999.
- ^ Degrandpre, R. J. (2000). "A science of meaning. Can behaviorism bring meaning to psychological science?". The American Psychologist. 55 (7): 721–739. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.7.721. PMID 10916862.
- ^ DeGrandpre, R. J. & White, E. (1996). Drugs: In the care of the self. Common Knowledge, 4, 27- 48.
- ^ "Richard DeGrandpre | Author | LibraryThing".
- ^ DeGrandpre, R. (1999). Ritalin Nation. New York: Norton
- ^ "RITALIN NATION | Kirkus Reviews".
- ^ "Ritalin critics draw similar conclusions". The Bradenton Herald. 1999-03-14. p. 37. Retrieved 2024-04-25.
- ^ "Mother's little helper". The Guardian. 3 March 1999.
- ^ Zigmond, Michael J. (2007). "Angels and demons; heroes and villains". Nature Medicine. 13 (9): 1013. doi:10.1038/nm0907-1013.
- ^ Degrandpre, Richard (2005). Die Ritalin-Gesellschaft: ADS: Eine Generation wird krankgeschrieben. Beltz. ISBN 3407221657.
- ^ Nimtz-Köster, Renate (19 December 1999). "Familienkrieg um Zappelphilipp". Der Spiegel.
- ^ https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/0817928723_255.pdf
- ^ "Ritalin Nation: Rapid-Fire Culture and the Transformation of Human Consciousness by Richard J. DeGrandpre".
- ^ a b Muschamp, Herbert (19 September 1999). "ART/ARCHITECTURE; Peeking Inside Other People's Dream Houses". The New York Times.
- ^ DeGrandpre, R. (2001). Digitopia. New York: Random House
- ^ a b DeGrandpre, R. (2006). The Cult of Pharmacology. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press
- ^ "Digitopia: The Look of the New Digital You".
- ^ "DIGITOPIA: The Look of the New Digital You by Richard J. DeGrandpre".
- ^ "AtRandom's New Direction".
- ^ "E-Book Saga is Full of Woe --and a Bit of Intrigue". Los Angeles Times. 6 August 2001.
- ^ Degrandpre, Richard (2006). The Cult of Pharmacology. doi:10.1515/9780822388197. ISBN 978-0-8223-8819-7.
- ^ "Jim Windolf: A Talk with Author Richard DeGrandpre About the Latest Demon Drug". Vanity Fair. 31 January 2008.
- ^ "Technocrats of the Mind". 2 February 2007.
- ^ "No Bad Drugs". 20 March 2008.
- ^ Malleck, Dan (2007). "Richard Degrandpre. The Cult of Pharmacology: How America Became the World's Most Troubled Drug Culture . Durham: Duke UP, 2006. 296 pp. Cloth. $19.96. ISBN: 0822338815". The Social History of Alcohol and Drugs. 21 (2): 209–211. doi:10.1086/SHAD21020209.
- ^ Degrandpre, Richard (2006). The Cult of Pharmacology. doi:10.1515/9780822388197. ISBN 978-0-8223-8819-7.
- ^ "Richard DeGrandpre: Cult of Pharmacology | Madness Radio". YouTube. 28 August 2018.
- ^ A.R. Lindesmith, The Addict and the Law. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (1965).
- ^ Courtwright, David T. (2007). "The Cult of Pharmacology: How America Became the World's Most Troubled Drug Culture". Addiction. 102 (6): 1006–1007. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01867.x.
- ^ https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/entertainment/books/2007/01/14/medication-nation-span-classbankheada-scholar-charges-that-drugs-dont-affect-us-the-way-we-think-they-dospan/dfb0f714-e6f0-4327-b841-b48ff19aa817/
- ^ Gladwell, Malcolm (7 February 1999). "Running from Ritalin". The New Yorker.
- ^ "Stuff".
- ^ https://natlib.govt.nz/records/20421853?search%5Bi%5D%5Bsubject%5D%5B%5D=Murray%2C+Renton&search%5Bi%5D%5Bsubject%5D%5B%5D=Murray%2C+Rosie&search%5Bpath%5D=items
- ^ "Instagram".
- ^ "Monstera | Auckland Shopping | Heart of the City".
- ^ "Monstera madness and fiddle-leaf frenzy: Why we go crazy for indoor plants". 18 January 2019.
- ^ "How to be a Good Plant Parent, According to an Indoor Plant Expert". 18 April 2020.