Draft:Richard Polsted
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Richard Polsted (24 June 1545 – 31 March 1576) of Albury, Surrey, was an English politician.
Family
[edit]Richard was the son of parliamentarian Henry Polsted.[1]
In November 1567 Richard married Elizabeth More of Loseley, the daughter of Sir William More.[2] Their wedding was described as "the event of the year" by historian W. J. Jones, and was followed by festivities in Blackfriars lasting two weeks.[3]
Career
[edit]Polsted served as a Member of Parliament for the constituency of Hinton in the 1571 and 1572 parliaments, during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I.[1] In 1573, Polsted served as High Sheriff of Surrey and Sussex alongside John Rede.[4]
References
[edit]- 1 2 "POLSTED (POLSTEAD), Richard (1545-76) of Aldbury, Surr. | History of Parliament Online". History of Parliament Online. Retrieved 27 April 2026.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ Surrey County Council, Woodhatch Place. "Chief members of the More family of Loseley and other main correspondents". www.surreycc.gov.uk. Retrieved 2026-04-27.
- ↑ McCutcheon, Elizabeth (1999). "Playing the Waiting Game: The Life and Letters of Elizabeth Wolley". Quidditas. 20 (31): 31–53.
- ↑ "About". High Sheriffs' Association. Retrieved 2026-04-27.

- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.