| Submission declined on 14 September 2023 by S0091 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 15 December 2019 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 4 years ago. | |
| Submission declined on 15 December 2019 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 4 years ago. | |
Comment: Also need to avoid words like "instrumental" and "key player" which is cited to a primary source. S0091 (talk) 20:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: This person appears to be notable, or at least have a reasonable shot at notability.See first reference and this search: [1]. Therefore postponing G13. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Richard T. Pullen (October 25, 1849 - 1922) was an American businessman instrumental in the safe and vault manufacturing business. He first entered the business in 1874 as a clerk in the time keeping department of the Hall's Safe & Lock Co. in Cincinnati, Ohio before rising to the role of Secretary.[1]
Upon the formation of the Herring-Hall-Marvin Co., he was elected to the board of directors and became its Secretary.[2] He would later become the President of the Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.[3] – a role that he would maintain for a number of years. Pullen was a key player in the Supreme Court case: The Hall's Safe Co. vs Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., decided in favor of The Hall's Safe Co. in 1908.[4]
References
edit- ^ Cincinnati, the Queen City of the West : her principal men and institutions, biographical sketches and portraits of leading citizens, descriptive accounts of her enterprises
- ^ The Inter Ocean Chicago, Illinois 10 May 1892
- ^ The Cincinnati Enquirer – Cincinnati, Ohio 28 Jun 1905, Wed
- ^ https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/208/554.html