Submission declined on 10 April 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 10 April 2024 by Velella (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Velella 5 months ago. |
Submission declined on 10 April 2024 by Velella (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Velella 5 months ago. |
Submission declined on 9 April 2024 by Velella (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Velella 5 months ago. |
Submission declined on 1 April 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 5 months ago. |
- Comment: The single source addition is just a single name check - adds nothing to notability Velella Velella Talk 14:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: One recent edit removed material but did not add any additional sources. Still fails WP:GNG Velella Velella Talk 13:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: No evidence of notability. The first ref is simply a name-check of the University of which is is said to be president. The others simply repeat quotations of his but with no commentary on the person. A long way from meeting WP:GNG. The source claiming to support the subject's founding of a school in Singapore instead refers to the founding by a company. This article is not about the company, only the man. Editing style could indicate paid editing Velella Velella Talk 15:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Ritesh Hada | |
---|---|
Occupation(s) | Entrepreneur, Educationist |
Known for | President of Karnavati University |
Ritesh Hada is the founder and president of Ahmedabad based Karnavati University .[1]
UID
editTo fill the gap in the design talent pool for the industrial and non-industrial sectors, in 2012, the United Group opened the United Institute of Design in Ahmedabad, which is affiliated with the Gulbarga University and contributes to shaping the skills of talented designers in various design disciplines. In 2017, Government of Gujarat granted Private University status to Karnavati University. In 2018, students of the Unitedworld Institute of Design (UID), a constituent of Ahmedabad based Karnavati University, launched a clothing label called Colour Me Young by organising a fashion show.[2][3] Ritesh hada is the president of Mumbai based Singapore International School.[4]
References
edit- ^ Bureau, ET. "United Group opens design institute in Ahmedabad". economictimes.indiatimes.com. The Economic Times. Retrieved 24 July 2012.
{{cite web}}
:|last1=
has generic name (help) - ^ india, the times of india (22 January 2018). "Ahmedabad design student launch apparel". The Times of India. Times of india. Retrieved 3 April 2024.
- ^ sis, school. "sis mumbai". Business standard. BS Reporter. Retrieved 11 Feb 2015.