Submission declined on 29 March 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 13 January 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by DoubleGrazing 7 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 6 January 2024 by DreamRimmer (talk). See WP:AUTO Declined by DreamRimmer 8 months ago. | ![]() |
Shubham Sharma is an Indian screenwriter known for his significant contributions in the Indian entertainment industry.[1] After working as an ML engineer at Amazon Development Centre in Chennai, he moved to Mumbai in 2017 to chase his dream of becoming a writer.[2] In Mumbai, while his writing journey began with writing for television shows on Star TV Network, he followed that with screenplays for acclaimed web shows.[3]
It was in 2021, with Flipkart Video's popular crime show Crime Stories: Khoj Apradhi Ki, that Shubham gained widespread recognition as a screenwriter.[4]After that came a series of successes in his filmography with iconic shows like Kaun? Who did it? (2021), Abhay (2022) and TVF Pitchers (2022).[5][6]
References
edit- ^ Filmmakers' Podcast #5 | In Conversation With Shubham Shama | TVF Pitchers | @TheViralFever, 8 January 2023, retrieved 2024-02-07
- ^ Meet the Writer of @TheViralFever Pitchers - Season 2 | Shubham Sharma | ZEE5, 29 December 2022, retrieved 2024-02-07
- ^ admin (2023-12-01). "Shubham Sharma: An odyssey from Amazon to TVF Pitchers to AI Magic at Gradium". BITS Pilani. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "Crime Stories - Khoj Apradhi Ki: Join Inspector Vikrant In the Latest Flipkart Video Originals". DNA India. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "Abhay 3 Review: Kunal Kemmu Sails Through Gruesome Season With Effortless Ease". NDTV.com. Retrieved 2024-01-05.
- ^ "Pitchers Season 2 Review : A skilful depiction of the trials and tribulations of a start-up venture". The Times of India. ISSN 0971-8257. Retrieved 2024-01-05.