| Submission declined on 28 March 2024 by The Herald (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 10 February 2024 by BuySomeApples (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by BuySomeApples 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 13 January 2024 by BuySomeApples (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by BuySomeApples 7 months ago.
| |
Comment: Entire collaboration sections is uncited. Need more references everywhere to establish notability. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
StormStock is a collection of extreme weather and climate stock footage founded by filmmaker and storm chaser Martin Lisius in 1993.[1][2] The brand is owned by Prairie Pictures, Inc. of Arlington, Texas. Content produced by StormStock is licensed for use in TV shows, films, commercials, and other video productions. Topics include footage of hurricanes,[3] tornadoes,[4] lightning, climate change,[5] supercell thunderstorms, extreme weather,[6] and natural disasters. The collection focuses on producing content on high-resolution formats including 4K, 8K and 16K video[7]. Lisius tracks and films storms and is the primary contributor to the StormStock collection.[8][9]
- ^ "Post Magazine - StormStock: Prairie Pictures marks 30 years of shooting extreme weather footage". www.postmagazine.com. Retrieved 2024-07-30.
- ^ Carleton, Will (2018-10-24). "Watch: Storm Stock - 25 Years chasing stormy weather". Photoarchivenews. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
- ^ "Post Magazine - August 2017". digital.copcomm.com. Retrieved 2024-03-27.
- ^ "Post Magazine - StormStock captures devastating Oklahoma tornado". www.postmagazine.com. Retrieved 2024-01-26.
- ^ Carleton, Will (2018-10-02). "StormStock - The world's top source for weather and climate footage". Photoarchivenews. Retrieved 2024-03-27.
- ^ "Footage.net Expands Extreme Weather Footage with StormStock". www.businesswire.com. 2011-10-31. Retrieved 2024-01-26.
- ^ "'Prairie Storm' Could Be The First 16K Film Yet -- And Its Stunning". Digital Trends. 2018-11-24. Retrieved 2024-03-27.
- ^ Carleton, Will. "Interview: Martin Lisius Owner at StormStock |". Retrieved 2024-01-16.
- ^ "StormStock's Lisius wins cinematography honor at International Innovation Film Fest". SHOOTonline. 31 March 2020. Retrieved 2024-01-16.