| Submission declined on 23 October 2024 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 30 July 2024 by Asilvering (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Asilvering 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 31 May 2024 by Justiyaya (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Justiyaya 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 29 May 2024 by Chaotic Enby (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Chaotic Enby 5 months ago. | |
Comment: reviewing WP:NPOV could provide some additional help/insight Justiyaya 03:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Susan Zinn (LPCC, LMHC, NCC)is a board-certified national clinical counselor, behavioral researcher, certified trauma eating disorder specialist, and founder of Westside Counseling Center in Los Angeles.[1] Susan resides in Los Angeles with her children: Charley (19) and Jackson (17).
Westside Counseling Center
editWestside Counseling Center[2] is a holistic psychotherapy practice located in Los Angeles, California.
Media Appearances and Contributions
editSusan's research can be seen in various publications such as Everyday Health,[3] Netflix,[4] HuffPost,[5] TODAY,[6] and more.
Awards and Honors
editSusan has received the President's Volunteer Service Award from President Obama and recognition as an "Inspirational Woman" by the Los Angeles Times.[7]
References
edit- ^ "Susan Zinn, Counselor, Santa Monica, CA, 90401".
- ^ "Westside Counseling Center".
- ^ "Disordered Eating vs Eating Disorder: What's the Difference?". 12 July 2024.
- ^ "'The Woman in the House' Grapples With Trauma and Escapism - Netflix Tudum".
- ^ "These 6 Tricks Will Help You Cope with Anxiety While Flying". 9 December 2022.
- ^ "Getting back with your ex? Here's what therapists want you to know". 23 November 2021.
- ^ "Susan Zinn". Los Angeles Times.
- ^ Osilla, Karen Chan; D'Amico, Elizabeth J.; Lind, Mimi; Ober, Allison J.; Watkins, Katherine E. (January 25, 2016). "Brief Treatment for Substance Use Disorders: A Guide for Behavioral Health Providers" – via www.rand.org.
- ^ "Reject All Tobacco (RAT)".