Submission declined on 2 November 2023 by InterstellarGamer12321 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 27 June 2023 by SportingFlyer (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SportingFlyer 17 months ago. |
Submission declined on 22 April 2023 by Bonadea (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bonadea 19 months ago. |
Submission declined on 21 April 2023 by Nthep (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Nthep 19 months ago. |
Submission declined on 10 March 2023 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 20 months ago. |
- Comment: The issues raised by previous AfC reviewers have been not been fixed. Please add reliable, independent sources with WP:SIGCOV of the subject to established notability per WP:NSPORT. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 14:19, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Does not appear to meet notability guidelines. SportingFlyer T·C 12:21, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Resubmitted immediately after the previous decline, no attempt made to fix the issues bonadea contributions talk 16:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Fails WP:SPORTCRIT. Someone who made just one appearance and didn't register any stats during that one game is going to be difficult to establish as notable Nthep (talk) 19:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
No. 85 | |
---|---|
Position: | Wide Receiver |
Personal information | |
Born: | Fort Dodge, Iowa | April 12, 1964
Height: | 5 ft 11 in (1.80 m) |
Weight: | 178 lb (81 kg) |
Career information | |
College: | Concordia University |
Undrafted: | 1987 |
Career history | |
Stats at Pro Football Reference |
Todd Mitchell Black (born April 12, 1964) is a former American football wide receiver who played a single game for the Chicago Bears of the National Football League (NFL) in 1987.
Black played college football at Concordia University.[1][2][3][4]
Black was one of the replacement players, 'scabs' or 'spare Bears', engaged by the Bears during the NFLPA strike.[5][6] At the time he was a physical education teacher at Oak Park and River Forest High School.[7] On October 4, 1987, he debuted for the Chicago Bears against the Philadelphia Eagles at Veterans Stadium. Black failed to record any statistics for the game.
References
edit- ^ "Todd Black stats". Pro-Football-Reference.com. Retrieved March 10, 2023.
- ^ "Todd Black, DB". Nfl.com. Retrieved March 10, 2023.
- ^ "Todd Black NFL Stats and Bio". Pro Football Archives.com. Retrieved March 10, 2023.
- ^ "Todd Black (2003) - Athletic Hall of Fame". CUCougars.com. Retrieved March 12, 2023.
- ^ "Concordia rookie LB Chris Garrett makes Rams 53-man roster". September 2021.
- ^ "NFL Strike Roster - UPI Archives".
- ^ "Bears Ii Playing It Straight". Chicago Tribune. 4 October 1987.