Submission declined on 9 November 2024 by Theroadislong (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
From February 24, 2017 to February 27, 2017, Wikipedia users debated over if the character Garfield is male or has no gender.
Wikipedia Garfield gender debate | |
---|---|
Part of the Wikipedia controversies | |
Date | February 24–27, 2017 (2 days and 12 hours) |
Caused by | Dispute over whether Garfield's gender is male or if he doesn't have a gender. |
Resulted in | Consensus that Garfield is male. |
Background
editIn 2018, Mental Floss did an interview with Garfield creator Jim Davis in which Davis said "By virtue of being a cat, really, he’s not really male or female or any particular race or nationality, young or old."[1] [2]
Debate
editOn February 24, 2017, podcaster Virgil Texas would find the Mental Floss article about the interview with Jim Davis.[3] Virgil would then tweet about Davis' remarks regarding the gender of Garfield and he edited the Wikipedia article "Garfield (character)".[4]
Virgil's edit would be reverted by a Wikipedia editor in less than an hour of the edit being published.[1] A discussion would then start on the article's talk page about Garfield's gender.
The debate would result in the Wikipedia article being locked down.[1]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c Cavna, Michael; Selk, Avi (1 March 2017). "Garfield's a boy … right? How a cartoon cat's gender identity launched a Wikipedia war". The Washington Post. Retrieved 9 November 2024.
- ^ Feldman, Brian (1 March 2017). "Congress Has Entered the War Over Garfield's Gender". Intelligencer. Retrieved 9 November 2024.
- ^ Schmall, Tyler (1 March 2017). "The great Garfield gender debate ends after Wikipedia edit war". Mashable. Retrieved 9 November 2024.
- ^ McMillan, Graeme (5 March 2017). "While You Were Offline: An Age-Old Enigma, Solved: Garfield Is a Boy … We Think". Wired. Retrieved 9 November 2024.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.