Draft talk:2019 Dayton tornado

	Weather portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
	Tornadoes portal This page is supported by WikiProject Severe weather.

Ohio

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.OhioWikipedia:WikiProject OhioTemplate:WikiProject OhioOhio articles

Disaster management

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles

Notability table

Latest comment: 4 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If you don't mind, I'm going to use this draft as a non-neutral way of seeing if my AfD/C table is effective, and it may be helpful to the article itself (although you can feel free to remove this if you don't want it). Formerly MemeGod, E_F⁵ 19:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

EF5's Tornado AfD Table
Criteria no.	Sub-criteria	Description	Pass?	Fail?	Comments
1 (Coverage)	1a	Any coverage?	Y		Here, here and here are good examples.
	1b	Any significant coverge? (e.g. CNN or the NYT)	Y		NPR, ResearchGate and USA Today.
	1c	Any lasting coverage past 6 months after the tornado?	Y		See above links.
2 (Strength)	2a	Was the tornado EF0-EF2?
	2b	Was the tornado EF3?
	2c	Was the tornado EF4?	Y
	2d	Was the tornado EF5?
3 (Damage)	3a	Did the tornado kill at least one person?		Y	Death is indirect.
	3b	Did the tornado injure at least one person?	Y		166 injuries, high count for an EF4 tornado
	3c	Did the tornado cause monetary damage totaling over $200,000 USD?	Y		$500 million (2019 USD) in damges, seems notable in this aspect
4 (Aftermath)	4a	Did the tornado significantly damage a town?		Y	To be fair, Dayton is huge.
4 (Aftermath)	4b	Any notable deaths?		Y
5 (Content)	5a	Is the article not a CFORK of an existing section?			Draft is still under construction.
	5b	Can the content not be easily merged into a section?			Draft is still under construction.
	5c	Is the article longer than the page on its respective outbreak?			Draft is still under construction.
	5d	Is the article a GA, FA or has recently been featured on DYK?			Draft is still under construction.
6 (Overall)	6a	Are at least five of these criterion met, with exceptions made if needed?	Y
Final verdict:		Pass: Meets GNG, LASTING and SUSTAINED. Would likely survive a potential AfD discussion.

Add topic