Draft talk:Aircall

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Software: Computing

	This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
	This draft is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Telecommunications

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications

Internet

This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet

How to improve sources

Latest comment: 5 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, which sources specifically are substandard? @MSK @JSFarman Trenton Erker (talk) 18:38, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Trenton Erker.

The key issue is that references need to provide extensive coverage via independent, reliable sources. Les Echo is great and Tech Crunch is OK.

Otherwise, press releases (Yahoo), articles that include advertising disclosures (Forbes, Business News Daily) and articles based on company-provided materials are not independent. (Business Insider and funding pieces.) Geekwire is generally reliable, but the article is about an office opening; the company is only briefly covered. Forward Media appears to be sponsored content. (There's no byline, and the publication is operated by a marketing company.) One of the Forbes refs does not mention Aircall.

Give the articles about reliable and independent sources a read for more information. IMO, for a company, you will need at least five references that meet the criteria to establish notability. JSFarman (talk) 04:57, 4 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Dang. This was really helpful. Thank you for working with me on this. Trenton Erker (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply