Defined multiple times

edit

Hi there, I don't understand why the citations in this article were flagged for being defined multiple times with different content. Then it linked to the help page to define as "foo". But "foo" only works if you have that with one piece of content. I followed the instructions for how to do this when multiple citations have this. So, I don't understand why it was flagged. SCAFP213 (talk) 19:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Also, this topic was rejected as not being Wikipedia worthy.

edit

This topic is absolutely Wikipedia worthy and uses lots of secondary sources. It's a 100+ year construction company that worked on major infrastructure in the Pacific Northwest and is comparable to a similar company entry such as Kiewit Corporation. SCAFP213 (talk) 19:49, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply