Draft talk:Jacob Edwards

This draft must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the draft and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this draft, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This draft is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Australian rules football Low‑importance

	Australia portal Jacob Edwards is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This draft has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This draft is supported by WikiProject Australian rules football (assessed as Low-importance).

AI generated template explanation

Latest comment: 23 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi -- I added the AI-generated template here; other similar contributions by the article's creator in the same time period (i.e., not their 2020 stuff) display many signs of AI use, and while this article is less obvious in that regard (the first edit is more obvious), common sense suggests that it needs scrutiny as well, particularly as it is a BLP. Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:05, 3 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

The tag was been restored. Small parts of the article have been rewritten but most of it remains the generated text. The article was tagged for LLMPROD but that was removed without following LLMPRVOBJ. ‑‑gurkubondinn 00:28, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply