This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi
This draft is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology
Mycosophy is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology
@Dr. Christian v.T. Taylor - In direct answer to your question - right on your sandbox page, at the top, there is a button to click to submit for review. (You removed it. Please leave the template in place. If accepted, it will be published without the template.)
However, in a quick glance at your draft I can tell that it will not be accepted and will need some revisions. Please review the note left on your talk page - User talk:Dr. Christian v.T. Taylor - on your first article. Follow the links, especially on synthesis, citation/references, and formatting. —ERcheck (talk) 22:06, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your very helpful advice. Sorry for being such a novice. This is my first foray into creating a new article. I have removed all promotion from my user page and I have re-drafted the mycosophy sandbox draft article so that it is more an encyclopedic entry with references to independent sources. I think it is better now although I still need to work on the formatting - especially the references. Dr. Christian v.T. Taylor (talk) 22:18, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply