This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
... that over 90 world leaders have commited to the Leaders' Pledge for Nature; to nature-positive policies, reversing biodiversity loss and full nature recovery by 2050?
Overall: Interesting topic and extensive article, earwig picks up some phrases but these are just long names for government departments and names of agreements. I slightly copyedited hook for length, its a bit long but within WP:DYKTRIM rules. QPQ not needed —John Cummings (talk) 21:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Addition of "Controversy" section and expansion of "in practice" section
Latest comment: 2 days ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hello Wikipedians,
I have added a controversy section to address the debate that has emerged around the nature-positive goal. I have also expanded the "in practice" section to include information on policies in Australia, the EU, Japan, the United Kingdom, and United Nations. I have plans to expand this section further to gain a more representative global view and to add to the "Approaches" section. If you have any suggestions/questions after my edit please let me know!
Manxshearwater (talk) 08:34, 16 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I've just moved things around a little so that it's easier to find where things are. Also the "in practice" section would have become way too long. Please remember there should be no external links (as hyperlinks) in the main text. Please remove them e.g. by converting them into references. EMsmile (talk) 10:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Interesting topic and extensive article, earwig picks up some phrases but these are just long names for government departments and names of agreements. I slightly copyedited hook for length, its a bit long but within WP:DYKTRIM rules. QPQ not needed —John Cummings (talk) 21:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)