Wikipedia

Nature-positive

Nature-positive is a concept and goal to halt and reverse nature loss by 2030, and to achieve full nature recovery by 2050.[1] According to the World Wide Fund for Nature, the aim is to achieve this through "measurable gains in the health, abundance, diversity, and resilience of species, ecosystems, and natural processes."[2] Progress towards this goal is generally measured from a biodiversity baseline of 2020 levels.

The nature-positive goal aligns with the 2030 mission and 2050 vision of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). However, the GBF does not explicitly mention nature positive. The goal is designed to integrate with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement's climate goals.[2] It is distinct from other policy approaches for biodiversity loss, such as "no net loss" or "net positive impact".

Governments have committed to the nature positive goal, including the United Kingdom,[3] Australia,[4][5][6] and Japan.[7][8] Over 90 world leaders have signed the Leaders' Pledge for Nature,[9] which calls for a nature-positive future by 2030.[10] A commitment to nature positive was also signed by the members of the G7 at the 47th summit in 2021[11] and a G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies[12] has since been launched.[13]

Definition

edit
 
Discussion of the definition for nature positive at COP15

In 2023, the Nature Positive Initiative (NPI) defined nature positive as a global societal goal to "Halt and Reverse Nature Loss by 2030 on a 2020 baseline, and achieve full recovery by 2050."[1] This reflects the definition used by Harvey Locke et al. in a 2021 paper – "halting and reversing nature loss by 2030, measured from a baseline of 2020."[14] The term "nature" within the NPI definition of nature positive refers to "the natural world, with an emphasis on its living components", according to the IPBES definition.[15]

A broad range of definitions have been used by institutions and governments since the term was introduced.[16] This led to criticism of nature positive as vague and open to variable interpretation. Concerns have also been raised over the vulnerability of nature positive to greenwashing,[17][18] the "net" approach to biodiversity,[19] and over the "financialization of nature".[20][21]

Distinction from existing policy approaches

edit
See also: No net loss environmental policy

Nature positive differs from previous biodiversity strategies, including "no net loss" (NNL) policy and "net positive impact (NPI)" approaches.[16] No net loss refers to biodiversity policy that aims to neutralise the loss of biodiversity, relative to an appropriately determined reference scenario.[22] Net positive impact refers to a goal for project outcomes, where the project's impact on biodiversity is outweighed by actions to reduce, rehabilitate, and offset these impacts.[23] NNL and NPI differ because NNL focuses on preventing losses, while NPI focuses on aiming for a net gain in biodiversity. Metrics are required to quantify these losses and gains.[16][24]

NNL and NPI generally focus on applying the mitigation hierarchy, a tool commonly used in environmental impact assessment to manage risk to biodiversity that uses a hierarchy of steps (avoidance, minimisation, rehabilitation, restoration, and offsetting), to the direct impacts of an organisation.[16] However, direct impacts are only a small fraction of the biodiversity impacts of an organisation.[16] The scope of nature positive extends beyond direct impacts, to the whole value chain of a company (all activities needed to deliver goods or services to customers) of a company and to sector-wide for transformative improvements in sustainability practices. Frameworks for nature positive that extend beyond the classical mitigation hierarchy have been proposed, such as the Mitigation and Conservation Hierarchy[25] and the SBTN's AR3T framework.[26]

Nature positive also emphasises review and transformation to align all the decisions within a business with the goal of achieving nature positive.[27] This involves embedding nature in decision-making, governance, strategy, and management of risks – a process described as mainstreaming. Mainstreaming distinguishes nature positive from NNL and NPI approaches, where biodiversity considerations are generally dealt with by ecological managers at project sites.[16] In addition to mainstreaming, nature positive aims to integrate natural and social issues, rather than addressing these issues separately.[16] It also aims to scale against global or regional societal goals to achieve absolute gains for biodiversity, instead of relative gains. By contrast, the ambition of NNL and NPI has historically been at the project level, comparing to a baseline of declining baseline and not to overall targets.[25]

Overall, nature positive, NNL, and NPI policies differ through their scope, mainstreaming (embedding biodiversity considerations across a business or organisation), integration, and ambition.[16]

Background

edit
 
Chart showing the Living Planet Index, global extent, from 1970, with 95% confidence interval, showing decline in species population.

Nature is essential for economic and societal function. However, biodiversity loss is occurring rapidly on a global scale – since 1970, wildlife populations declined by 69%, on average, between 1970 and 2018.[28] Biodiversity loss and its potential implications on ecosystem functioning, ecosystem services, the global economy, and wider society have gained increasing attention.[28]

This has led to international environmental agreements (such as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets), national plans (such as National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plans), corporate commitments, and local action.[29] However, these have largely failed to fulfil their targets - for example, only 6 of 67 sub-targets of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets were achieved by its target year, 2020.[30]

By 2020, proponents of nature positive argued that there was no concise headline goal to address biodiversity loss[14] – while the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development proposes equitable human development, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change puts forward a carbon-neutral goal of net zero emissions for 2050, and the Paris Climate Change Agreement aims to limit global warming to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, there was no equivalent for biodiversity loss. Nature positive was therefore proposed as a "global goal for nature" to integrate with climate and development goals and direct future global agreements to an "Equitable, Nature-Positive, Carbon Neutral world."[14]

Support for the term and concept

edit
 
G7 leaders at the 47th summit in Cornwall, United Kingdom in 2021

Nature-positive is increasingly being discussed by businesses, governments, and NGOs.[18][16] For example, the United Nations, World Economic Forum,[16] the G7,[13] and the European Union[31] have all discussed the nature positive goal, both within and beyond published reports. In addition, the Nature Positive Initiative[32] (NPI) was launched in September 2023 to promote awareness of the nature-positive goal and align the definition used for the term.[33]

Governments have committed to the nature positive goal, including the United Kingdom,[3] Australia,[4][5][6] and Japan.[7][8] Within the United Kingdom, the devolved government in Scotland has committed to nature positive by 2030.[34] Over 90 world leaders have signed the Leaders' Pledge for Nature,[9] which calls for a nature-positive future by 2030.[10] A commitment to nature positive was also signed by the members of the G7 at the 47th summit in 2021[11] and a G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies[12] has since been launched.[13]

The United Nations

edit

The term nature-positive has been used by the United Nations (UN) in several reports published by its programmes and agencies. For example, the UN Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI) published a 'Financial Sector Guide for the Convention on Biological Diversity' in June 2021.[35] It described this report as "nature-positive finance guidance" with the aim of mobilising "financial institutions to engage positively with nature." The UNEP FI also published a report entitled 'Adapt to Survive: Business transformation in a time of uncertainty' in 2021,[36] which states that "shifting towards a Nature Positive approach is the best way for business to transform" and defines a Nature Positive economy as "an economy that is regenerative, collaborative and where growth is only valued where it contributes to social progress and environmental protection."[36] Nature is a key theme for the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI), described as "accelerating nature-positive action in the finance industry."[37]

In November 2021, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC), and the Secretariat for the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD) published a report entitled 'Creating a Nature Positive Future: The Contribution of Protected Areas and Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures'.[38] This report defined nature positive as "actions that increase resilience of the planet and biodiversity, as well as societies, with the aim of creating a paradigm shift to reduce the loss of nature, secure nature's contributions critical for humanity, and enhance sustainable socio-economic development."[38]

Following COP15 in December 2022, the Nature Positive Tourism Partnership was launched[39][40] by the UN World Tourism Organisation with the World Travel & Tourism Council and the Sustainable Hospitality Alliance. On April 22, 2024, the 'Nature Positive Travel & Tourism' report was published.[41]

Nature-positive has been used by the UN beyond its published reports. For example, nature positive food systems were the focus of a Global Summit Dialogue in 2021, as part of the UN Food Systems Summit.[42] The nature-positive goal has been discussed[43][44] by the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which uses the NPI definition of the term.[45] Also, as part of its Decade on Restoration, UNEP partnered with the University of Oxford to launch Nature Positive Universities (NPU).[46] The aim of NPU is to help universities achieve the nature positive goal and encourages them to make a 'Nature Positive Pledge'.  

Critique

edit

Nature-positive has been criticised as vague and vulnerable to greenwashing.[47][17] This is partly because different definitions have been used to describe the term across institutions since its emergence.[16] To align the definition of nature-positive and ensure the integrity of its use, the Nature Positive Initiative was launched in September 2023 and published a definition that has subsequently been used widely.[48]

Fears were expressed that increased use of the term had introduced a danger of diluting its meaning, where used too freely to refer to any action that benefits nature.[49][18] In a 2022 paper, E.J. Milner-Gulland proposed that, to avoid greenwashing, the nature-positive goal requires a measured biodiversity baseline, a timeframe, a target, a clear set of actions, an analysis of how these actions will add up to reach net gain, regular monitoring, and disclosure of progress.[18] Furthermore, in a 2024 paper, Maron and colleagues argued the need to implement the mitigation hierarchy as essential to prevent greenwashing and enable achievement of the nature-positive goal.[10]

The concept of a nature-positive economy was criticised in an open letter by the think-tank Green Finance Observatory in November 2022.[50][51] The letter raised concerns about the concept of a nature positive economy as promoting the "financialization of nature's destruction" and diverting focus from ongoing biodiversity loss.[52] Similarly, nature-positive was criticised by Greenpeace in 2022 as focusing on "saving a failed economic model" over the protection of biodiversity, promoting the "financialization of nature", and described the measures it uses (a 2020 nature baseline, net positive nature improvements by 2030, and full nature recovery by 2050) as vague.[53][17] Response to these criticisms came from E.J. Milner-Gulland, who said that "there is no solution without business – painting business as the enemy is an own goal."[17]

Further criticisms have resulted from the application of a net approach as part of the nature-positive concept.[54] This implies that loss and degradation of biodiversity will continue. However, Friends of the Earth have argued that the net approach fails to account for loss of ecosystem function, assumes like-for-like compensation is possible, and sets unrealistic expectations for offsetting.[55] The conservationists that proposed nature-positive argue that this is an "inevitable result of humanity's ongoing demand [...] and differing stages of development."[14]

Nature positive commitments made by governments have received criticism. For example, in the UK, the British Government has been called on by the Wildlife Trusts to raise its ambition for nature positive development through the Biodiversity Net Gain policy[56] and the devolved government in Wales was called on by Climate Cymru,[57] RSPB Cymru, and Wales Environment Link[58] to draft a Nature Positive Bill.[59][60] In Australia, the definition of nature positive used by the government was criticised, including by Megan Evans at the University of New South Wales, who described it as "a pathetic definition."[61]

By country

edit

Australia

edit

In recent years, Australia has included the nature-positive goal in its environmental policy. For example, the Australian government's Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment, and Water released a Nature Positive Plan (NPP) in 2022.[62] In this plan, the government set out proposed legal reforms, including to establish Environment Protection Australia and Environment Information Australia.[5] The plan also made commitments to protect 30% of the country's land and sea by 2030 and to work towards zero new extinctions.[62] This commitment aligns with the 30 by 30 target set out by the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. To fund the continued implementation of the NPP, the government announced $40.9 million between 2024 and 2026, as part of the 2024 Federal Budget. The budget has been criticised by environmental groups and academics, including because of the allocation of more funds to carbon capture and storage than to addressing biodiversity loss.[63]

As part of the legal reforms proposed by the NPP, Minister for the Environment and Water, Tanya Plibersek, proposed The Nature Positive (Environment Information Australia) Bill 2024 to establish Environment Information Australia. The bill defines nature-positive as "an improvement in the diversity, abundance, resilience and integrity of ecosystems from a baseline."[64] This definition of nature-positive has received criticism because it does not include a 2020 baseline for measurable improvement, and instead leaves this to be determined by the Head of Environment Information Australia. Senior Lecturer in environmental policy at the University of New South Wales, Megan Evans, described this as "absolutely greenwashing" and said that "it is a pathetic definition".[61] An amendment to the definition set out in the bill was proposed by Crossbench MP, Zoe Daniel, that instead defines nature-positive as "halting and reversing the decline in diversity, abundance, resilience and integrity of ecosystems and native species populations by 2030 (measured against a 2021 baseline), and achieving recovery by 2050."[65]

Australia hosted the Global Nature Positive Summit at Sydney's International Convention Centre from 8–10 October 2024.[66] The aim of the summit was to "inform the design of nature positive activities"[67] and boost private sector investment by bringing together ministers, private sector leaders, First Nations peoples, scientists, academics, and community leaders.[68]

European Union

edit

The European Union (EU) has expressed support for the nature-positive goal. In September 2020, President of the European Commission at the time, Ursula von der Leyen endorsed the Leaders' Pledge for Nature.[69] Later, at the 47th G7 Summit, the EU was among member states that made a commitment to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. The EU is also a member of the G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies (G7ANPE), established in April 2023. The French, Italian, and German governments are members of the G7ANPE too.[13]

The European Commission has published a number of reports that discuss transition to nature positive economies. For example, the European Commission Directorate-General for Research & Innovation released a report from independent experts about the role of nature-based solutions for a nature-positive economy.[70] In June 2024, a mid-term review of the EU's 8th Environmental Action Programme reiterated a call to member states to "mainstream an ecosystem approach" and to work towards nature-positive economies and societies.[71]

Japan

edit

The nature-positive goal has been discussed by the Japanese government since at least 2022. The Study Group on Nature Positive Economies was established by the Ministry of the Environment in March 2022, leading to the publication of 'Transition Strategies toward Nature Positive Economy' in March 2024 by the Ministry of the Environment, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism.[7] The aim of the strategy is to work towards implementing the 'National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan' (NBSAP), announced in March 2023. The NBSAP includes Basic Strategy 3, the aim to achieve a nature-positive economy.[7] This is part of Japan's commitment to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

The Japan Conference for the 2030 Global Biodiversity Framework (J-GBF) was established in 2021 to achieve the 30 by 30 target and the post-2020 biodiversity framework.[72] The first J-GBF assembly, held in February 2023, announced the 'J-GBF Nature-Positive Declaration'.[8] In October 2023, Nagoya City became the first designated city to make a nature-positive declaration.[73] By March 2024, 28 organisations had made nature-positive declarations. At the second general assembly of the J-GBF, held in September 2023, a Nature-Positive Action Plan was announced. In October 2023, the J-GBF issued a press release calling on companies, local governments, NGOs, and other actors to issue and register nature-positive declarations that state an aim to achieve nature positivity.[8]

To promote the nature-positive goal, the Ministry of the Environment announced daidaraposie, a cartoon character. Daidaraposie was created by Kiyokazu Motoyama[21] and is based on Daidarabotchi, a figure in Japanese mythology. It was announced in October 2023 on the same day as the call for nature-positive declarations was made by the J-GBF and followed a call for public submissions earlier that year.[21] The aim is for the character to be used to promote the nature-positive goal, with the government allowing free use "on posters, flyers, pamphlets, pop advertisements, business cards, websites, and other media that contribute to the dissemination and awareness of nature positivity, and are created to publicize the efforts being made by all local governments, companies, organizations, and individuals that aim to be nature positive."[74]

The Japanese government is also a member of the G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies, along with other Japanese environmental initiatives and businesses: Keidanren Nature Conservation Council, Japanese Business Initiative for Biodiversity, Syneco, Sumitomo Chemical, Karatsu Farm & Food, Taisei Corporation, and the IUCN Japan National Committee.[13]

United Kingdom

edit

In June 2021, the government of the United Kingdom committed to a nature-positive future in response to the findings of the Dasgupta Review on The Economics of Biodiversity and as part of the wider commitment made by G7 member states at the 47th summit in Carbis Bay, Cornwall.[75] The UK government later joined the G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies. when it was established after the 49th G7 summit.[13] Since then, the nature-positive goal has been discussed in Parliament, including in both the House of Commons[76] and House of Lords[77] in 2024, as well as in the Environmental Audit Committee as part of an inquiry into the role of natural capital in the green economy. However, the UK is yet to make a legally-binding commitment to achieving the nature-positive goal.

Targets for achieving the nature-positive goal were set in the 2023 'Environmental Improvement Plan', published by the Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs.[78] This includes objectives for a nature positive food system and determining investment pathways for key sectors to make the transition to a nature positive economy. However, the Office for Environmental Protection, a regulatory body for environmental protection, said that the government was "largely off track" to meet the targets this plan set out in a progress report published in January 2024.[79][80]

In September 2021, Nature Positive 2030 was published by the five statutory nature conservation bodies of the UK: the Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Natural England, Natural Resources Wales, NatureScot and the Northern Ireland Environment Agency.[81] This includes two reports, a summary and an evidence report. Nature Positive 2030 sets out priority actions to achieve the nature positive goal, such as deploying nature-based solutions, improving management of protected areas, and developing a market for green finance to support nature recovery.[82] The report was praised by Edwin Poots, Environment Minister at the time.[83] It received support from almost 100 companies.

The UK government has also been called on by the Wildlife Trusts to raise its ambition for nature positive development through the Biodiversity Net Gain policy.[84] The RSPB, a charity dedicated to the conservation of birds in the UK, has called for a nature-positive economy.[85] Climate Cymru, RSPB Cymru, and Wales Environment Link have called for a Nature Positive Bill in Wales.[86][87] In January 2024, a white paper was issued by the Welsh government. The paper set out proposals to introduce a bill to the Senedd (Wales' devolved parliament) that would introduce a statutory nature positive target for biodiversity.[88]

Scotland

edit

The devolved Scottish Government made a commitment to be nature positive by 2030 in its 'Scottish Biodiversity Strategy to 2045', published in December 2022 and later updated in September 2023.[89][90] The Strategy sets out priority actions to achieve the nature positive goal and is part of Scotland's Biodiversity Delivery Framework (BDF). The BDF includes the Scottish Biodiversity Strategy to 2045 and 4 other elements: a Natural Environment Bill, delivery plans, an investment plan, and a reporting framework.[91]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b Nature Positive Initiative (2023). "The Definition of Nature Positive" (PDF). Nature Positive Initiative. Retrieved 2024-06-24.
  2. ^ a b World Wide Fund for Nature (2024). "Nature Positive by 2030". WWF.
  3. ^ a b "Government commits to 'nature-positive' future in response to Dasgupta review". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  4. ^ a b DCCEEW, (2022), "Nature Positive Plan: better for the environment, better for business", Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/nature-positive-plan.pdf
  5. ^ a b c DCCEEW (2024-04-16). "Progressing our Nature Positive law reforms". Australian Government, Department of Climate Change, Environment, Energy, and Water. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  6. ^ a b Visentin, Lisa (26 August 2023). "Sydney beats rival bids to host global nature summit". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 26 June 2024.
  7. ^ a b c d Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (2024-03-29). "Publication of Transition Strategies toward Nature Positive Economy". Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  8. ^ a b c d Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (2023-10-13). "2030生物多様性枠組実現日本会議（J-GBF）による「ネイチャーポジティブ宣言」の呼びかけについて". Ministry of the Environment. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  9. ^ a b https://www.leaderspledgefornature.org/
  10. ^ a b c Maron, Martine; Quétier, Fabien; Sarmiento, Mariana; ten Kate, Kerry; Evans, Megan C.; Bull, Joseph W.; Jones, Julia P. G.; zu Ermgassen, Sophus O. S. E.; Milner-Gulland, E. J.; Brownlie, Susie; Treweek, Jo; von Hase, Amrei (2023-09-21). "'Nature positive' must incorporate, not undermine, the mitigation hierarchy". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 8 (1): 14–17. Bibcode:2023NatEE...8...14M. doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02199-2. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 37735564.
  11. ^ a b Cabinet Office (2021-07-12). "Policy Paper – G7 2030 Nature Compact". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  12. ^ a b https://g7anpe.com/
  13. ^ a b c d e f G7 (2024-06-26). "G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies". G7 Alliance on Nature Positive Economies. Retrieved 2024-06-26.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  14. ^ a b c d Locke, H., Rockström, J., Bakker, P., Bapna, M., Gough, M., Hilty, J., Lambertini, M., Morris, J., Polman, P., Rodriguez, C.M. and Samper, C., (2021). A nature-positive world: The global goal for nature.
  15. ^ IPBES, (2021), 'Glossary – nature', https://www.ipbes.net/glossary/nature, IPBES
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k zu Ermgassen, Sophus O.S.E.; Howard, Michael; Bennun, Leon; Addison, Prue F.E.; Bull, Joseph W.; Loveridge, Robin; Pollard, Edward; Starkey, Malcolm (2022-12-15). "Are corporate biodiversity commitments consistent with delivering 'nature-positive' outcomes? A review of 'nature-positive' definitions, company progress and challenges". Journal of Cleaner Production. 379: 134798. Bibcode:2022JCPro.37934798Z. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134798. ISSN 0959-6526.
  17. ^ a b c d Weston, Phoebe; Greenfield, Patrick (2022-12-13). "What does 'nature positive' mean – and can it rally support to stop biodiversity loss?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  18. ^ a b c d Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2022-08-08). "Don't dilute the term Nature Positive". Nature Ecology & Evolution. 6 (9): 1243–1244. Bibcode:2022NatEE...6.1243M. doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01845-5. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 35941204.
  19. ^ "Perspectives on Nature Positive". GYBN. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  20. ^ Green Finance Observatory (2022) 'NATURE MUST BE PROTECTED FROM THE "NATURE POSITIVE ECONOMY" – OPEN LETTER TO THE WWF, WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM, CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY & EUROPEAN COMMISSION', Green Finance Observatory, https://greenfinanceobservatory.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/openletternaturepositive-final-3.pdf
  21. ^ a b c Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (2023-10-13). "「ネイチャーポジティブ」イメージキャラクター及び愛称を決定しました。". Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  22. ^ "No-net loss definition| Biodiversity A-Z". www.biodiversitya-z.org. Retrieved 2024-07-15.
  23. ^ "Net positive impact (NPI) definition| Biodiversity A-Z". www.biodiversitya-z.org. Retrieved 2024-07-15.
  24. ^ "Understanding the differences between net positive impact and nature positive and how achieving these goals can overlap". Bluedot Associates. Retrieved 2024-07-16.
  25. ^ a b Milner-Gulland, E.J.; Addison, Prue; Arlidge, William N.S.; Baker, Julia; Booth, Hollie; Brooks, Thomas; Bull, Joseph W.; Burgass, Michael J.; Ekstrom, Jon; zu Ermgassen, Sophus O.S.E.; Fleming, L. Vincent; Grub, Henry M.J.; von Hase, Amrei; Hoffmann, Michael; Hutton, Jonathan (January 2021). "Four steps for the Earth: mainstreaming the post-2020 global biodiversity framework". One Earth. 4 (1): 75–87. Bibcode:2021OEart...4...75M. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.011. ISSN 2590-3322.
  26. ^ "Act". Science Based Targets Network. Retrieved 2024-07-15.
  27. ^ Booth, Hollie; Milner-Gulland, E.J.; McCormick, Nadine; Starkey, Malcolm (2024-07-05). "Operationalizing transformative change for business in the context of Nature Positive". One Earth. 7 (7): 1235–1249. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2024.06.003. ISSN 2590-3322.
  28. ^ a b WWF (2022) Living Planet Report 2022 – Building a naturepositive society. Almond, R.E.A., Grooten, M., Juffe Bignoli, D. & Petersen, T. (Eds). WWF, Gland, Switzerland.https://wwflpr.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2022full_report_1.pdf
  29. ^ Arlidge, William N S; Bull, Joseph W; Addison, Prue F E; Burgass, Michael J; Gianuca, Dimas; Gorham, Taylor M; Jacob, Céline; Shumway, Nicole; Sinclair, Samuel P; Watson, James E M; Wilcox, Chris; Milner-Gulland, E J (2018-04-18). "A Global Mitigation Hierarchy for Nature Conservation". BioScience. 68 (5): 336–347. doi:10.1093/biosci/biy029. ISSN 0006-3568. PMC 5925785. PMID 29731513.
  30. ^ Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2020). "Global Biodiversity Outlook 5" (PDF). Convention on Biological Diversity. Retrieved 2024-07-01.
  31. ^ "The Leaders' Pledge for Nature: United to reverse biodiversity loss by 2030 for Sustainable Development | EEAS". www.eeas.europa.eu. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  32. ^ https://www.naturepositive.org/
  33. ^ Cottam, Bryony (2024-06-25). "Nature positive economy on the horizon, but businesses struggle to measure impact". Geographical. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  34. ^ "A nature positive Scotland". www.gov.scot. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  35. ^ SCBD, BfN, FfB, PRI, (2021), 'FINANCIAL SECTOR GUIDE FOR THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY KEY ACTIONS FOR NATURE | 3', UNEP, https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/8e24/f151/326b69024f014a8fb9684a8d/cbd-financial-sector-guide-f-en.pdf
  36. ^ a b United Nations Environment Programme (2021). Adapt to Survive: Business transformation in a time of uncertainty. UNEP, Nairobi
  37. ^ UN Environment Programme, Finance Initiative (2024-06-26). "Nature". UN Environment Programme Finance Initiative. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  38. ^ a b UNDP, SCBD & UNEP-WCMC (2021). Creating a Nature-Positive Future: The contribution of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures. UNDP: New York, NY.
  39. ^ "The World Travel & Tourism Council Announce Collaboration with UNWTO and Sustainable Hospitality Alliance at COP15". www.unwto.org. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  40. ^ "Why 'nature positive travel' is trending for 2023". euronews. 2022-12-31. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  41. ^ "A United Vision for Nature - 'Nature Positive' Report Marks New Collaborative Era in Travel & Tourism". www.unwto.org. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  42. ^ Nations, United. "Global Summit Dialogue on nature positive food systems highlights food systems impact on the environment". United Nations. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  43. ^ Owen-Burge, Charlotte (2023-06-12). "The Race is On: Net Zero & Nature Positive for Climate Action". Climate Champions. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  44. ^ Owen-Burge, Charlotte (2023-09-29). "Every sector must play their part in contributing towards a nature-positive future. Here's how". Climate Champions. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  45. ^ "Nature Positive for Climate Action". Climate Champions. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  46. ^ "Launching the Nature Positive Universities Alliance". UN Decade on Restoration. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  47. ^ Graham, Jack. "Conservationists push 'nature positive' as biodiversity's net zero | Context". www.context.news. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  48. ^ "Nature Positive Initiative launches to promote the integrity and implementation of the Global Goal for Nature – WBCSD". www.wbcsd.org. 2023-09-06. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  49. ^ Maron, Martine; Evans, Megan C.; Ermgassen, Sophus zu (2023-09-21). "'Nature positive' isn't just planting a few trees – it's actually stopping the damage we do". The Conversation. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  50. ^ "Over 100 experts oppose 'Nature Positive Fund' in open letter to UN before COP15". www.downtoearth.org.in. 6 December 2022. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  51. ^ gfobs (2022-11-04). "Open letter: 119 experts call to protect nature from the "nature positive economy"". Green Finance Observatory. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  52. ^ Green Finance Observatory (2022) 'NATURE MUST BE PROTECTED FROM THE “NATURE POSITIVE ECONOMY” – OPEN LETTER TO THE WWF, WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM, CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY & EUROPEAN COMMISSION', Green Finance Observatory, https://greenfinanceobservatory.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/openletternaturepositive-final-3.pdf
  53. ^ "What is wrong with "Nature Positive"?". Greenpeace International. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  54. ^ "Perspectives on Nature Positive". GYBN. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  55. ^ "How positive will "Nature Positive" be? - Friends of the Earth". 2022-11-16. Retrieved 2024-07-01.
  56. ^ "UK Government must raise ambition for nature positive development say The Wildlife Trusts | The Wildlife Trusts". www.wildlifetrusts.org. 2024-02-08. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  57. ^ https://climate.cymru/
  58. ^ https://waleslink.org/
  59. ^ "On our way to a Nature Positive Wales – RSPB Cymru Blog – We love Wales! – The RSPB Community". community.rspb.org.uk. 2024-01-30. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  60. ^ Cyswllt Amgylchedd Cymru, Wales Environment Link (2024-05-30). "The need for a 'Nature Positive' Bill in Wales" (PDF). Senedd Wales. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  61. ^ a b Morton, Adam (4 June 2024). "Labor has adopted its own 'nature positive' approach to the environment. But is it just a 'snazzy slogan'?". The Guardian. Retrieved 26 June 2024.
  62. ^ a b DCCEEW, (2022), "Nature Positive Plan: better for the environment, better for business", Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/nature-positive-plan.pdf
  63. ^ Wintle, Brendan; Possingham, Hugh; Evans, Megan C. (2024-05-17). "Threatened species have declined 2% a year since 2000. Nature positive? Far from it". The Conversation. Retrieved 2024-07-15.
  64. ^ Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. "Nature Positive (Environment Information Australia) Bill 2024". Parliament of Australia. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  65. ^ The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia (2024-06-26). "Nature Positive (Environment Information Australia) Bill 2024". Parliament of Australia. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  66. ^ Visentin, Lisa (2023-08-26). "Sydney beats rival bids to host global nature summit". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  67. ^ IISD, SDG Knowledge Hub (2024-06-26). "Global Nature Positive Summit 2024". IISD SDG Knowledge Hub. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  68. ^ DCCEEW (2024-06-25). "The Global Nature Positive Summit 2024". Australian Government, Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment, and Water. Retrieved 2024-06-25.
  69. ^ "The Leaders' Pledge for Nature: United to reverse biodiversity loss by 2030 for Sustainable Development | EEAS". www.eeas.europa.eu. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  70. ^ European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, (2022). The vital role of nature-based solutions in a nature positive economy, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/307761
  71. ^ Council of the European Union, General Secretary of the Council (2024-06-17). "OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS - The 8th Environmental Action Programme Mid-term Review - The way forward to a green and just transition for a sustainable Europe". Consilium, European Union. Archived from the original on 2024-06-19. Retrieved 2024-07-01.
  72. ^ "J-GBFについて". Japan GBF 2030. 2024-06-26. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  73. ^ NTV NEWS (2024-03-13). "アプリで身近な"いきもの"集め！楽しみながら生物多様性の大切さを学ぶ 名古屋市". NTV NEWS NNN. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  74. ^ Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan (2023-10-13). "ネイチャーポジティブキャラクター「だいだらポジー」". Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan. Retrieved 2024-06-26.
  75. ^ "Government commits to 'nature-positive' future in response to Dasgupta review". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  76. ^ UK Parliament, Hansard (2024-05-15). "Biodiversity Loss". UK Parliament. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  77. ^ UK Parliament, Hansard (2024-05-09). "Skills: Importance for the UK Economy and Quality of Life". UK Parliament. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  78. ^ "Environmental Improvement Plan 2023 Published - UK Plant Health Information Portal". planthealthportal.defra.gov.uk. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  79. ^ "Government remains largely off track to meet its environmental ambitions, finds OEP in annual progress report | Office for Environmental Protection". www.theoep.org.uk. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  80. ^ George, Sarah (2024-01-18). "Environmental Improvement Plan: UK Government making scant progress one year on, watchdog warns". edie. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  81. ^ "Nature Positive 2030 | JNCC - Adviser to Government on Nature Conservation". jncc.gov.uk. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  82. ^ Brotherton P., Anderson, H., Galbraith, C., Isaac, D., Lawton, J., Lewis, M., Mainwaring-Evans, T., McGuckin, S., Ormerod, S., Osowska, F., Sizeland, P., Stuart, E., Walmsley, C., Waters, R. & Wilkinson, S. (2021) Nature Positive 2030 – Evidence Report. JNCC, Peterborough. ISBN 978-1-86107-635-9
  83. ^ "Poots praises UK Nature Positive 2030 Report". DAERA. 2021-10-05. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  84. ^ "UK Government must raise ambition for nature positive development say The Wildlife Trusts | The Wildlife Trusts". www.wildlifetrusts.org. 2024-02-08. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  85. ^ "Building a Nature Positive Economy". rspb.org.uk. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  86. ^ "On our way to a Nature Positive Wales - RSPB Cymru Blog - We love Wales! - The RSPB Community". community.rspb.org.uk. 2024-01-30. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  87. ^ Cyswllt Amgylchedd Cymru, Wales Environment Link (2024-05-30). "The need for a 'Nature Positive' Bill in Wales" (PDF). Senedd Wales. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  88. ^ Welsh Government, Llwydraeth Cymru (2024-01-30). "Consultation on the White Paper - Securing a Sustainable Future Environmental Principles, Governance and Biodiversity targets for a Greener Wales" (PDF). Welsh Government. Retrieved 2024-06-28.
  89. ^ "A nature positive Scotland". www.gov.scot. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  90. ^ "Supporting documents". www.gov.scot. Retrieved 2024-06-27.
  91. ^ Scottish Biodiversity Strategy to 2045: Tackling the Nature Emergency in Scotland (PDF). Scottish Government, Riaghaltas na h-Alba. 2022. ISBN 978-1-80525-330-3.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nature-positive&oldid=1252627795"