Draft talk:Osvaldo Gutierrez
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Sandbox Article Edit
editThe article title was added and two references. VV VDay28 (talk) 06:36, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Added the information from our google doc to the sandbox. RR DeaconTheNarrator (talk) 04:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: CIS50 - Computer Ethics
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 October 2024 and 1 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alanv57, VDay28, DeaconTheNarrator (article contribs). Peer reviewers: RealJJUniverse, JmartSD1969, Sootren, "kadderley, CIS50-F24-MTL, Valeriaramirez0801, Bristhekid.
— Assignment last updated by Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: He is not notable
Ldm1954 (talk) 00:11, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi there. I was hoping I could ask on why you don't believe this individual to be notable enough for their own article. An insight would be greatly appreciated. DeaconTheNarrator (talk) 00:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- The criteria for academics are spelt out in WP:NPROF. In general junior professors do not meet these, he certainly does not yet with decent but not high publications and no major awards. In addition the article is full of irrelevant material and a fair bit of WP:Peacock. You were not guided well on what to include, not everyone merits a WP page, the bar is high. Ldm1954 (talk) 02:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Ldm1954, Gutierrez was profiled by C&EN of the American Chemical Society, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, and KCRA news. I think with these sources the article passes WP:BASIC. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:50, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, no I do not agree with that. Everything speaks to him as a rising young star, but we look for much, much more than this in WP:NPROF. One local news station and a couple of interviews in science journals does not to me rise to WP:BASIC, particularly as the two journal articles are about him as a young scientist. Of course you can put it back and we can go to AfD, or post to WP:N to get additional opinions about whether this meets WP:BASIC. I think the case is far, far weaker than for Ryan Emanuel. Ldm1954 (talk) 20:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hello @Ldm1954, Gutierrez was profiled by C&EN of the American Chemical Society, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, and KCRA news. I think with these sources the article passes WP:BASIC. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:50, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- The criteria for academics are spelt out in WP:NPROF. In general junior professors do not meet these, he certainly does not yet with decent but not high publications and no major awards. In addition the article is full of irrelevant material and a fair bit of WP:Peacock. You were not guided well on what to include, not everyone merits a WP page, the bar is high. Ldm1954 (talk) 02:27, 30 November 2024 (UTC)