This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
In response to Lettlerhello's Comment: "No lasting coverage, as far as I see from looking on Google. If more sources can be found to prove GNG, and the article is cleaned up to be less essay-like, I will be happy to accept. Lettlerhello • contribs 15:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)"
To reject a missing article because the news from 1988 doesn't quickly appear in a google search is more than pathetic in its shortsightedness and lack of awareness. Perhaps news from pre-The Internet might not have found its way into the google algorithm? How did you get to be an "expert" who decides which articles enter Wikipedia? Do you just feel good rejecting an article? I want answers.
Start a discussion about improving the Draft:Self-immolation of Mehrdad Imen page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Draft:Self-immolation of Mehrdad Imen" page.