Ref number
|
Source
|
Secondary
|
Independent
|
Reliable
|
Significant coverage
|
Comment
|
1
|
Soundpainting
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Seems to be a certification page; shouldn't contribute towards notability
|
2
|
Pakt-Bern
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Not independent, because the page allows its members to host a "personal portrait page" on their server (which was referenced here).
|
3
|
Sandy Brown Jazz
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Seems to be an independent Jazz Magazine that qualifies as a source here on Wikipedia; however, it doesn't discuss this draft's subject in great detail.
|
4
|
Dampfzentrale
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Dampfzentrale is a place at which events are hosted; they have an obvious interest in promoting artists that perform there; doesn't discuss the subject though.
|
5
|
Jazztime
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Jazztime seems like an independent source and it has an article on the subject that discusses him in sufficient detail. It seems to promote the subject (there are links to his web pages), but that is commonplace in German-language sources and not indicative of not ticking the independence criterion.
|
6
|
Platinumlist
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Platinumlist is a place at which events are hosted; they have an obvious interest in promoting artists that perform there; doesn't discuss the subject though.
|
7
|
Pro Helvetia
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
The source is clearly labeled as an "artists's tale", i.e., not an independent source; also doesn't discuss the subject.
|
8
|
Moods
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Seems to be a Jazz Club; not a secondary or independent source, and doesn't discuss the subject.
|
9
|
Unit Records
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
Unit Records seems to be a music publisher; not a secondary or independent source, and doesn't discuss the subject.
|
10
|
Porgy.at
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Seems to be a Jazz Club; not a secondary or independent source, and doesn't discuss the subject.
|
11
|
Uptownband
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Seems to be a band; not a secondary or independent source, and doesn't discuss the subject.
|
12
|
Pro Helvetia
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Clearly not an independent source
|
13
|
Andreas Wiesmann
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
A personal blog; doesn't make any sense to cite this as a source in any Wikipedia article
|
14
|
YouTube
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Doesn't need any explaining I reckon
|
15
|
ZHdK
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
ZHdK are generally a reliable source, but it doesn't discuss the subject, and the cited page is also an announcement for an exhibition and thus not well-suited for a Wikipedia article
|
16
|
Luzerner Zeitung
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Good source, but no significant coverage
|
17
|
OT301
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
Definitely not an independent source; also doesn't look like significant coverage
|
18
|
MoonMot
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
The subject's band's homepage; a reliable source, but not independent.
|
19
|
Schweizer Musikzeitung
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
Good source, but no significant coverage
|
20
|
Jazzthing
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
A good source, but the cited article is a concert announcement, and there is no significant coverage.
|
21
|
Scenenow
|
Yes
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
A reasonable source, but not an independently written article; since it's an announcement for "Waking the Giants" I'd argue that it's no sigcov.
|
22
|
Hochschule Luzern
|
No
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
This is a press release and doesn't discuss the subject.
|