This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles
Latest comment: 7 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 7 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Dear all, I created that article (COI disclosed, see above/user page) based on the public German version, and by taking inspiration from the layout of the articles on Andrej Karpathy and Bernhard Schölkopf. I wold be particularly happy on feedback on the following points (just edit the article if the answer is clear):
- "Institutions" within the box: The company (TWT Science & Innovation) is relatively small and hence has no page; is it anyway noteworthy to mention it? Otherwise, just remove and keep the academic afiliation (ZHAW). As for a reference for it, I took inspiration from the reference in Andrej Karpathy's article to his Google Scholar profile for the "Fields", and referenced the LinkedIn profile; but I am in doubt whether this makes sense. Please just remove if not.
- Interlanguage links: I am still struggling with the correct syntax for the few occasions where there is no wikipedia Article in EN, hopefully I can resolve it myself soon
- External links: In the article on Andrej Karpathy, there is a special syntax for the Google Scholar profile, whereas here is just the plain web source link. Is there a preference for either? In Addition, the German articles on scientists have links to their personal and institutional websites as well, which is why they are added here as well. Shall that be removed?
Otherwise, the article is a straightforward translation from the content in the public German article on Thilo Stadelmann. The only added new facts are the fellowship of the ECLT and senior membership of IEEE, because this is more relevant in the international context. Does it make sense to keep it? Thilostadelmann (talk) 13:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 hours ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It would be helpful to mark sources deemed potentially unreliable, too close, or primary (outside of the "research" section). Then, alternatives can be sought explicitly for those. Thilostadelmann (talk) 09:05, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
