Economic substance is a doctrine in the tax law of the United States under which a transaction must have both a substantial purpose aside from reduction of tax liability and an economic effect aside from the tax effect in order to qualify for any tax benefits. This doctrine is used by the Internal Revenue Service to determine whether tax shelters, or strategies used to reduce tax liability, are considered "abusive".[1] Under the doctrine, for a transaction to be respected, the transaction must change the taxpayer's economic position in a "meaningful way" apart from the Federal income tax effects, and the taxpayer must have had a "substantial purpose" for entering into the transaction, apart from the Federal income tax effects.[2]
The economic substance doctrine was originally a common law doctrine.[3] The doctrine was codified in subsection (o) of section 7701 of the Internal Revenue Code by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.[4][5]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ The Economic Substance Doctrine in the Current Tax Shelter Environment: Remarks by Donald L. Korb, Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue Service
- ^ See subsection (o) of 26 U.S.C. § 7701.
- ^ See ACM Partnership v. Commissioner, 157 F.3d 231 (3rd Cir. 1998), affirming 73 T.C.M (CCH) 2189 (1997), cert. denied, 526 U.S. 1017 (1999).
- ^ "The Obameter: Require economic justification for tax changes". PolitiFact.
- ^ Sec. 1409, Pub. L. No. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029, 1067 (March 30, 2010).
Further reading
edit- Black, Stephen (2008). "A Daddy-Daughter Chat About Economic Substance". doi:10.2139/ssrn.1282195. S2CID 152696047. SSRN 1282195.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help)
 | This tax-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |