Entity
This article needs more citations. (August 2026) |
An entity is something that exists as itself. It does not need to be of material existence. In particular, abstractions and legal fictions are usually regarded as entities. In general, there is also no presumption that an entity is animate, or present. The verb tense of this form is to 'entitize' - meaning to convert into an entity; to perceive as tangible or alive.
The term is broad in scope and may refer to animals; natural features such as mountains; inanimate objects such as tables; numbers or sets as symbols written on a paper; human contrivances such as laws, corporations and academic disciplines; or supernatural beings such as gods and spirits.
The adjectival form is entitative.
Definition
[edit]An entity is something that exists, such as a material object or living being.[1] Entities are often regarded as having separate or independent existence, each with its own identity and distinct from other entities.[2] In its broadest sense, the concept encompasses all identifiable items. This can include inanimate everyday objects, people, events, places, ideas, relations, facts, universal entities such as the color red, abstract objects such as the number 7, and collective entities such as sets.[3] Accordingly, the concept entity is often treated as the broadest category of being, covering everything that is or could be.[4] Some definitions provide narrower characterizations that require additional conditions, for example, that entities are stable, have clear boundaries, are indivisible, or serve as distinct objects that can be counted.[5]
Entities contrast with nonentities, although it is controversial to what this concept applies. Suggested examples of nonentities include voids, emptiness, nothingness, and absences, such as holes or shadows.[6] Similarly, philosophers debate whether nonexistent objects, such as the winged horse Pegasus, should be regarded as entities.[7] Another set of challenges comes from parts or aspects of reality that are not clearly identifiable, for example because they lack exact boundaries or cannot be precisely distinguished from other entities.[8] The terms reification and hypostatization can denote the practice of treating a nonentity as if it were an entity.[9][a]
The English word entity has its roots in the Latin term ens, meaning 'being'. It gave rise to the Latin word entitas and was subsequently adopted into French as the term entité. The French word was borrowed into English in the 16th century, with the earliest known use in 1596 in a work by Thomas Bell.[11]
Related concepts
[edit]The terms object, thing, and being are commonly used as synonyms of entity.[b] However, they carry distinct connotations and are sometimes used differently.[13]
An object is something toward which thought, perception, or intention is directed. In a broad sense, objects encompass all items apprehended, imagined, or referred to, including not only physical objects but also fictional ones without real counterparts, such as unicorns.[14] In a narrower sense, the term is sometimes limited to material entities that can be perceived by the senses.[15] A common distinction contrasts objects with subjects. It holds that while objects are grasped in consciousness, they do not possess it: an object is an it that can appear in someone's consciousness, whereas a subject is a self that acts as a center of consciousness.[16]
Understood broadly, a thing is any item whose existence is acknowledged, including but not limited to material bodies. In this regard, the word thing is the broadest countable noun, reflecting the slogan "everything is a thing".[17] However, the term is also used in more restricted ways to denote an individual entity in contrast to the properties it has or the relations it bears to other things. In this sense, a car is a thing, whereas its shape, color, and weight are features or aspects rather than things in their own right.[18][c] In everyday discourse, the term thing is often used for inanimate objects, such as rocks or chairs, contrasting with living creatures, such as humans and other animals.[20]
When used as a countable noun, the expression a being overlaps with that of an entity, denoting something that exists. However, being is also used as an uncountable noun, referring to the fact that something is, to existence as such, or to the totality of reality.[21] The distinction between being and beings played a central role in the philosophy of Martin Heidegger, who termed it the ontological difference. He argued that being constitutes the background context that makes all individual beings intelligible, insisting that being is not itself an individual being.[22] Traditionally, being is contrasted with becoming. In this sense, being denotes stable or permanent aspects of reality, whereas becoming covers changes and processes.[23]
In philosophy
[edit]Ontology is the study of concepts of existence, and of recognition of entities. The words ontic and entity are derived respectively from the ancient Greek and Latin present participles that mean "being".
In an ontic inquiry... one asks about the properties or the physical relations and structures peculiar to some entity – in the pen's case, for example, we might make the following ontic observations about it: it is black, full of blue ink, and sitting on top of my desk.[24]
In law, politics, economics, accounting
[edit]In law, a legal entity is an entity that is capable of bearing legal rights and obligations, such as a natural person or an artificial person (e.g. business entity or a corporate entity).
In politics, entity is used as term for territorial divisions of some countries (e.g. Bosnia and Herzegovina).
In economics, economic entity is one of the assumptions made in generally accepted accounting principles. Almost any type of organization or unit in society can be an economic entity.
In accounting, the entity concept is the concept that a business or an organization and its owners are treated as two separate parties.
In medicine
[edit]In medicine, a disease entity is an illness due to a particular definite cause or to a specific pathological process. While a disease entity is not defined by a syndrome, it may or may not be manifest in one or more particular syndromes.
In computer science
[edit]In computer science, an entity is an object that has an identity, which is independent of the changes of its attributes. It represents long-lived information relevant for the users and is usually stored in a database.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ↑ These terms are used when abstractions are regarded as material entities.[10]
- ↑ Other closely related terms include existent, substance, and stuff.[12]
- ↑ A similar contrast is also sometimes applied to the term object, regarding objects as individual entities that differ from the properties they instantiate.[19]
Citations
[edit]- ↑
- Simons & Cameron 2009, p. 582
- Tahko 2015, p. 237
- Lowe 2008, pp. 23, 35
- Blackburn 2008, p. 116
- ↑
- ↑
- Simons & Cameron 2009, p. 582
- Lowe 2008, pp. 23, 35
- Lowe 1998, p. 191
- Rettler & Bailey 2026, Lead section, § 1.1 No Contrast: the Umbrella View
- ↑
- McDaniel 2017, pp. 119
- Rettler & Bailey 2026, Lead section, § 1.1 No Contrast: the Umbrella View
- ↑
- Lee 1979, p. 128
- Lowe 1998, p. 191
- Blume 2005, pp. 325–326
- Meyer 2008
- ↑
- Mumford 2021, pp. 3, 38–39
- Martin 1996, pp. 57–59, 61–62, 64
- Routley & Routley 2019, pp. 67, 71–73, 95, 112–113
- Casati 2009, pp. 382, 385–386
- ↑
- Lamarque 1998, § 2. Deflationary Theories
- Mumford 2021, pp. 38–39
- ↑
- ↑
- Mumford 2021, pp. 38, 42, 87, 94
- Lee 1979, p. 128
- Martin 1996, pp. 62–63
- ↑
- ↑
- Hoad 1993, pp. 150–151
- OED staff 2026
- ↑
- Bunnin & Yu 2009, p. 213
- Rettler & Bailey 2026, Lead section
- Prasada, Ferenz & Haskell 2002, § Introduction
- ↑
- Simons & Cameron 2009, p. 582
- Lowe 2005, pp. 915–916
- Rettler & Bailey 2026, Lead section, § 1.1 No Contrast: the Umbrella View
- ↑
- Everett 2005, pp. 3–5
- Rettler & Bailey 2026, Lead section, § 1.1 No Contrast: the Umbrella View
- Simons & Cameron 2009, p. 590
- ↑
- MW staff 2026a
- Smith 2012, pp. 1, 4–5
- ↑
- Rettler & Bailey 2026, § 1.3 Contrast: Objects vs. Subjects
- Lowe 2005, pp. 915–916
- ↑
- Lowe 1998, p. 191
- van Inwagen 2007, pp. 199–200
- Lowe 2005, pp. 915–916
- Wallace 2003, Lead section
- ↑
- Lowe 2005, pp. 915–916
- Wallace 2003, § Particular Kind of Reality
- ↑
- Lowe 2005, pp. 915–916
- Simons & Cameron 2009, p. 590
- ↑
- ↑
- Lowe 2005a, p. 84
- MacIntyre 2006, Lead section, § 'Being' as a Name
- AHD staff 2022a
- OUP staff 2026
- ↑
- Nicholson 1996, pp. 357–358
- Wheeler 2020, § 2.2.1 The Question
- Inwood 1999, pp. 89–100
- ↑
- MacIntyre 2006, Lead section, § 'Being' as a Name
- Zhang 2011, p. 220
- Hartmann 2012, pp. 46–47
- ↑ Hubert L. Dreyfus, Mark A. Wrathall, eds., A Companion to Heidegger (2008), p. 3.
Sources
[edit]- AHD staff (2022). "Thing". The American Heritage Dictionary. HarperCollins. Retrieved 11 December 2025.
- AHD staff (2022a). "Being". The American Heritage Dictionary. HarperCollins. Retrieved 11 December 2025.
- AHD staff (2022b). "Reify". The American Heritage Dictionary. HarperCollins. Retrieved 11 December 2025.
- AHD staff (2022c). "Hypostatize". The American Heritage Dictionary. HarperCollins. Retrieved 11 December 2025.
- Blackburn, Simon (2008). The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-954143-0.
- Blume, Thomas (2005). "Entität". In Rehfus, Wulff D. (ed.). Handwörterbuch Philosophie (in German). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. pp. 325–326. ISBN 978-3-525-30148-7.
- Bunnin, Nicholas; Yu, Jiyuan (2009). The Blackwell Dictionary of Western Philosophy. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4051-9112-8.
- Casati, Roberto (2009). "40. Minor Entities". In Le Poidevin, Robin; Peter, Simons; Andrew, McGonigal; Cameron, Ross P. (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. Routledge. pp. 382–388. doi:10.4324/9780203879306-40. ISBN 978-0-203-87930-6.
- Collins staff (2026). "Entity". Collins English Dictionary. Retrieved 16 August 2026.
- CU staff (2026). "Entity". Cambridge Dictionary. Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2026. Retrieved 16 August 2026.
- Everett, Theodore J. (2005). "Are There Non-Existent Entities?". In Blackman, Larry Lee (ed.). The Philosophy of Panayot Butchvarov: A Collegial Evaluation. E. Mellen Press. pp. 3–19. ISBN 978-0-7734-6108-6.
- Hartmann, Nicolai (2012). New Ways of Ontology. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4128-4704-9.
- Hoad, T. F. (1993). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-283098-8.
- Inwood, Michael (1999). A Heidegger Dictionary. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-631-19094-3.
- Lamarque, Peter (1998). "Fictional Entities". Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780415249126-M021-1. ISBN 978-0-415-25069-6.
- Lee, Harold N. (1979). "Are There Any Entities?". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 40 (1): 123–129. doi:10.2307/2107141.
- Lowe, E. J. (1998). "Entity, Identity and Unity". Erkenntnis. 48 (2–3). doi:10.1023/A:1005327718934.
- Lowe, E. J. (2005). "Things". In Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 915–916. ISBN 978-0-19-926479-7.
- Lowe, E. J. (2005a). "Being". In Honderich, Ted (ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press. p. 84. ISBN 978-0-19-926479-7.
- Lowe, E. J. (2008). "Two Notions of Being: Entity and Essence". Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. 62: 23–48. doi:10.1017/S1358246108000568.
- MacIntyre, Alasdair (2006). "Being". In Borchert, Donald M. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference. pp. 527–532. ISBN 978-0-02-865780-6.
- Martin, C.B. (1996). "How It Is: Entities, Absences and Voids". Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 74 (1): 57–65. doi:10.1080/00048409612347061.
- McDaniel, Kris (2017). The Fragmentation of Being. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-103037-6.
- Meyer, Martin F. (2008). "Entität". Metzler Lexikon Philosophie (in German). Springer. ISBN 978-3-476-02187-8.
- Mumford, Stephen (2021). Absence and Nothing: The Philosophy of what There is Not. Oxford University Press. p. 38. ISBN 978-0-19-883153-2.
- MW staff (2026). "Entity". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 16 August 2026.
- MW staff (2026a). "Object". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 16 August 2026.
- MW staff (2026b). "Thing". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved 16 August 2026.
- Nicholson, Graeme (1996). "The Ontological Difference". American Philosophical Quarterly. 33 (4): 357–374. ISSN 0003-0481. JSTOR 20009875.
- OED staff (2026). "Entity, n.". Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
- OUP staff (2026). "Being". Oxford Learners Dictionaries. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 17 August 2026.
- Prasada, Sandeep; Ferenz, Krag; Haskell, Todd (2002). "Conceiving of Entities as Objects and as Stuff". Cognition. 83 (2): 141–165. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00173-1.
- Rettler, Bradley; Bailey, Andrew M. (2026). "Object". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 11 August 2026.
- Routley, Richard; Routley, Val (2019). Hyde, Dominic (ed.). Noneist Explorations I: The Sylvan Jungle - Volume 2. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-26309-6.
- Simons, Peter; Cameron, Ross P. (2009). "A Short Glossary of Metaphysics". In Le Poidevin, Robin; Peter, Simons; Andrew, McGonigal; Cameron, Ross P. (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. Routledge. pp. 578–599. doi:10.4324/9780203879306-40. ISBN 978-0-203-87930-6.
- Smith, Barry (2012). "On Classifying Material Entities in Basic Formal Ontology". In Smith, Barry; Mizoguchi, Riichiro; Nakagawa, Sumio (eds.). Interdisciplinary Ontology, Vol. 3: Proceedings of the Third Interdisciplinary Ontology Meeting. Keio University Press. pp. 1–13.
- Tahko, Tuomas E. (2015). An Introduction to Metametaphysics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-07729-4.
- van Inwagen, Peter (2007). "A Materialist Ontology of the Human Person". In Inwagen, Peter van; Zimmerman, Dean (eds.). Persons: Human and Divine. Clarendon Press. pp. 199–215. ISBN 978-0-19-927750-6.
- Wallace, W. A. (2003). "Thing". New Catholic Encyclopedia. Thomson Gale. ISBN 978-0-7876-4005-7.
- Wheeler, Michael (2020). "Martin Heidegger". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Archived from the original on 6 February 2022. Retrieved 18 August 2023.
- Zhang, Jiayan (2011). One and Many: A Comparative Study of Plato's Philosophy and Daoism Represented by Ge Hong. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-6118-6.