File talk:Action Hero Biju (2016) - Poster.jpg
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Nairspecht in topic Speedy delete
This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Speedy delete
editHello everybody! I think the CSD G5 tag does not apply here because the poster was last edited on August 20 and the user was confirmed blocked only on the 24th of the month, which is not a violation as per criterion #1 of the G5 here. Your inputs, Inside the Valley. Thanks, Nairspechtive Talk 07:02, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- You misunderstood the idea of G5. How can a user edit Wiki after their block. It can only be done when he create a new account, which is called Sockpuppetry. G5 applies to these users who create a page in violation of their ban or block. In this case, Uploader & Solver created the page File:Action Hero Biju (2016) - Poster.jpg, who is a sock puppet of DuplixD. The page will be deleted in anytime soon. Inside the Valley (talk) 09:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, that is possible. How do you think can users who are blocked request it to be dropped? G5 says, "To qualify, the edit or article must have been made while the user was actually banned or blocked. A page created before the ban or block was imposed or after it was lifted will not qualify under this criterion..." Does this support my argument? Best, Nairspechtive Talk 09:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- No. Since the user is a sock, he was blocked from editing when he was blocked at the first time, the sockmaster. Creating another account for editing is a violation of his ban. All edits made by a sock are edits made while they are banned. Hence, it qualifies speedy deletion, the edit or article was made while the user was actually banned or blocked. Also, To qualify, the edit must be a violation of the user's specific block or ban, here yes. All edits made by a sock are violation of their ban. Inside the Valley (talk) 11:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Okay. Best, Nairspechtive Talk 11:09, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- No. Since the user is a sock, he was blocked from editing when he was blocked at the first time, the sockmaster. Creating another account for editing is a violation of his ban. All edits made by a sock are edits made while they are banned. Hence, it qualifies speedy deletion, the edit or article was made while the user was actually banned or blocked. Also, To qualify, the edit must be a violation of the user's specific block or ban, here yes. All edits made by a sock are violation of their ban. Inside the Valley (talk) 11:07, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, that is possible. How do you think can users who are blocked request it to be dropped? G5 says, "To qualify, the edit or article must have been made while the user was actually banned or blocked. A page created before the ban or block was imposed or after it was lifted will not qualify under this criterion..." Does this support my argument? Best, Nairspechtive Talk 09:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)