File talk:Everybody Votes channel spoken (en).ogg

Spoken article quality assessment

Version reviewed: 03 April 2010

---

Technical quality: Low

• Too much white noise in the background.
• It seemed that you leaned in and moved back from the microphone that you were using.
• Sometimes you seemed bored, and the vocal tones reflected this.

---

Clarity: Low

• Enunciation was not there.
• Deep breaths took away from the article.
• Words ran together.

---

Accuracy: High

• Read word for word from the page and did not differ from it.
• Reading from the content boxes could have been a little clearer.

---

Notes: {{{notes}}}

---

Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.

Reviewed by: Fumitol (talk) 03:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC)