The Graded Salience Hypothesis is a theory regarding the psycholinguistic processing of word meaning, specifically in the context of irony, developed by Rachel Giora. It assumes that priority is given in the psychological activation and semantic retrieval of salient over less salient meanings inside the mental lexicon in the process of language comprehension.[1]
Lexical salience
editThe meaning(s) of a word can be considered salient if the associated meanings(s) is/are coded for in the mental lexicon.[2] That said, the degree of salience of a given word meaning cannot be viewed as a permanent, defining characteristic, but rather as a function of a number of psycholinguistic factors, such as frequency, conventionality, familiarity, and prototypicality. The more frequent, conventional, familiar, or prototypical a given word meaning is, the greater degree of salience it holds.[3]
Hypothesis
editThe graded salience hypothesis revolves around two major assumptions: 1. A salient meaning of a word is always activated and cannot be bypassed. 2. A salient meaning is always activated before any less salient meanings.[4]
Role of context
editIn the view of the graded salience hypothesis, context has a very limited role. Even though it can facilitate activation of a word meaning, it cannot inhibit the process of the more salient meaning activation.[4][5]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Giora Rachel. 2002. "Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal?", Journal of Pragmatics 34: 487-506.
- ^ Huang, Mimi Ziwei. 2009. “Solving the riddle of metaphor: A salience-based model for metaphorical interpretation in a discourse context”, in: New Directions in cognitive linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 107-126.
- ^ Kecskes Istvan. 2006. "On my mind: thought about salience, context and figurative language from a second language perspective": Second Language Research 22,2: 1-19.
- ^ a b Giora Rachel. 1997. "Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis, Cognitive Linguistics 8-3: 183-206.
- ^ Gibbs, Raymond. 1994. “Figurative Thought and Figurative Language”, in: Morton Ann Gernsbacher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press, 411-442.
Further reading
edit- Giora Rachel. 2002. "Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal?", Journal of Pragmatics 34: 487–506.
- Giora Rachel & Ofer Fein. 1999. "Irony comprehension: The graded salience hypothesis", Humor 12-4: 425–436.
- Kecskes Istvan. 2006. "On my mind: thought about salience, context and figurative language from a second language perspective": Second Language Research 22,2: 1-19.
External links
edit
 | This semantics article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |