Grain boundary diffusion coefficient

The grain boundary diffusion coefficient is the diffusion coefficient of a diffusant along a grain boundary in a polycrystalline solid.[1] It is a physical constant denoted , and it is important in understanding how grain boundaries affect atomic diffusivity. Grain boundary diffusion is a commonly observed route for solute migration in polycrystalline materials. It dominates the effective diffusion rate at lower temperatures in metals and metal alloys. Take the apparent self-diffusion coefficient for single-crystal and polycrystal silver, for example. At high temperatures, the coefficient is the same in both types of samples. However, at temperatures below 700 °C, the values of with polycrystal silver consistently lie above the values of with a single crystal.[2]

Measurement

edit
 
A model of grain boundary diffusion developed by JC Fisher in 1953. This solution can then be modeled via a modified differential solution to Fick's Second Law that adds a term for sideflow out of the boundary, given by the equation , where   is the diffusion coefficient,   is the boundary width, and   is the rate of sideflow.

The general way to measure grain boundary diffusion coefficients was suggested by Fisher.[3] In the Fisher model, a grain boundary is represented as a thin layer of high-diffusivity uniform and isotropic slab embedded in a low-diffusivity isotropic crystal. Suppose that the thickness of the slab is  , the length is  , and the depth is a unit length, the diffusion process can be described as the following formula. The first equation represents diffusion in the volume, while the second shows diffusion along the grain boundary, respectively.

  where  

 

where   is the volume concentration of the diffusing atoms and   is their concentration in the grain boundary.

To solve the equation, Whipple introduced an exact analytical solution. He assumed a constant surface composition, and used a Fourier–Laplace transform to obtain a solution in integral form.[4] The diffusion profile therefore can be depicted by the following equation.

 

To further determine  , two common methods were used. The first is used for accurate determination of  . The second technique is useful for comparing the relative   of different boundaries.

  • Method 1: Suppose the slab was cut into a series of thin slices parallel to the sample surface, we measure the distribution of in-diffused solute in the slices,  . Then we used the above formula that developed by Whipple to get  .
  • Method 2: To compare the length of penetration of a given concentration at the boundary   with the length of lattice penetration from the surface far from the boundary.

References

edit
  1. ^ P. Heitjans, J. Karger, Ed, “Diffusion in condensed matter: Methods, Materials, Models,” 2nd edition, Birkhauser, 2005, pp. 1-965.
  2. ^ Shewmon, Paul (2016). Diffusion in Solids. Bibcode:2016diso.book.....S. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48206-4. ISBN 978-3-319-48564-5. S2CID 137442988.
  3. ^ Fisher, J. C. (January 1951). "Calculation of Diffusion Penetration Curves for Surface and Grain Boundary Diffusion". Journal of Applied Physics. 22 (1): 74–77. Bibcode:1951JAP....22...74F. doi:10.1063/1.1699825. ISSN 0021-8979.
  4. ^ Whipple, R.T.P. (1954-12-01). "CXXXVIII. Concentration contours in grain boundary diffusion". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 45 (371): 1225–1236. doi:10.1080/14786441208561131. ISSN 1941-5982.

See also

edit