The Habermas–Rawls debate is the exchange which took place between John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas in The Journal of Philosophy in 1995. One major point of misunderstanding was Rawls's emphasis on social primary goods in a debate that included Habermasian notions of the public and common good.[1][2]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ Pedersen, J. (2012). "Justification and Application: The Revival of the Rawls-Habermas Debate". Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 42 (3): 399–432. doi:10.1177/0048393111414723. S2CID 144833860.
- ^ Finlayson, James Gordon (1 April 2007). "The Habermas-Rawls Dispute Redivivus". Politics and Ethics Review. 3 (1): 144–162. doi:10.1177/1743453X0700300111. S2CID 219961217.
Further reading
editFinlayson, Gordon (2019). The Habermas-Rawls Debate. Columbia University Press. ISBN 9780231549011.
External links
editFinlayson, James Gordon (2016). "Where the Right Gets in: On Rawls's Criticism of Habermas's Conception of Legitimacy" (PDF). Kantian Review. 21 (2): 161–183. doi:10.1017/S1369415416000017. S2CID 146636479. https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/the-habermas-rawls-debate/ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41296-020-00418-0 https://academic.oup.com/pq/article-abstract/72/1/249/6128792 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1368431020985416
 | This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This intellectual history article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
 | This article about critical theory is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |