Hall Street Assoc., L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act are exclusive and cannot be expanded through contractual agreement.[1][2]
| Hall Street Assoc., L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc. | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided March 25, 2008 | |
| Full case name | Hall Street Association, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc. |
| Citations | 552 U.S. 576 (more) |
| Holding | |
| The provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act are exclusive and cannot be expanded through contractual agreement. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Souter |
| Dissent | Stevens, joined by Kennedy |
| Dissent | Breyer |
| Laws applied | |
| Federal Arbitration Act | |
References
edit- ^ Hall Street Assoc., L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008).
- ^ "Opinion recap: Hall Street v. Mattel". SCOTUSblog. 2008-03-25. Retrieved 2024-11-04.
External links
edit- Text of Hall Street Assoc., L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |