Hazlehurst v. United States, 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 6 (1799), was a 1799 decision of the United States Supreme Court asserting that the appellants' (several similar cases were combined) failures to appear in court regarding their writs of error resulted in the Court issuing a orders of non prosequitur. The case was a federal case from South Carolina disputing their written seal on a bond which was purportedly improper because a wax seal was required.[1]
| Hazlehurst v. United States | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided August 9, 1799 | |
| Full case name | Hazlehurst, et al. v. United States |
| Citations | 4 U.S. 6 (more) |
| Holding | |
| orders of non prosequitur for failure to appear | |
| Court membership | |
| |
Opinion of the Court
editIn error from the circuit court for the district of South Carolina. A rule had been obtained by Lee, the attorney-general, at the opening of the court, that the plaintiffs appear and prosecute their writ of error within the term, or suffer a non-pros.: but it was found, that errors had been assigned in the court below, and a joinder in error entered here. The rule was, therefore, changed to the following: " that unless the plaintiffs in error appear and argue the errors tomorrow, a non-pros, be entered." The plaintiffs not appearing, the writ of error was non-prossed, according to the rule.[2]
References
edit- ^ Marcus (red.), Maeva (1985). The Documentary History of the Supreme Court of the United States, 1789-1800: Cases, 1798-1800. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-13976-2.
- ^ Reports of decisions in the Supreme Court of the United States: with notes and a digest, Volume 1 (Little, Brown, 1887), pg. 310 [1]
External links
edit- Text of Hazlehurst v. United States, 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 6 (1799) is available from: Library of Congress