Intangible asset

(Redirected from IAS 38)

An intangible asset is an asset that lacks physical substance. Examples are patents, copyright, franchises, goodwill, trademarks, and trade names, reputation, R&D, know-how, as well as any form of digital asset such as software and data. This is in contrast to physical assets (machinery, buildings, etc.) and financial assets (government securities, etc.).[1]

Intangible assets are usually very difficult to value.They suffer from typical market failures of non-rivalry and non-excludability.[2] Today, a large part of the corporate economy (in terms of net present value) consists of intangible assets,[3] reflecting the growth of information technology and organizational capital.[4]

Definition in accounting

edit
 
Intangible assets under the Corrado, Hultan and Sichel framework (source)

Intangible assets may be one possible contributor to the disparity between "company value as per their accounting records", as well as "company value as per their market capitalization".[5] Considering this argument, it is important to understand what an intangible asset truly is in the eyes of an accountant. A number of attempts have been made to define intangible assets:

  • The Australian Accounting Standards Board included examples of intangible items in its definition of assets in Statement of Accounting Concepts number 4 (SAC 4), issued in 1995.[6] The statement did not provide a formal definition of an intangible asset, but did explain that tangibility was not an essential characteristic of an asset.
  • The International Accounting Standards Board standard 38 (IAS 38)[7][8] defines an intangible asset as: "an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical substance". This definition is in addition to the standard definition of an asset which requires a past event that has given rise to a resource that the entity controls and from which future economic benefits are expected to flow. Thus, the extra requirement for an intangible asset under IAS 38 is identifiability. This criterion requires that an intangible asset is separable from the entity or that it arises from a contractual or legal right.
  • The Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Codification 350 (ASC 350) defines an intangible asset as an asset, other than a financial asset, that lacks physical substance.

The lack of physical substance would therefore seem to be a defining characteristic of an intangible asset. Both the IASB and FASB definitions specifically preclude monetary assets in their definition of an intangible asset. This is necessary in order to avoid the classification of items such as accounts receivable, derivatives and cash in the bank as an intangible asset. IAS 38 contains examples of intangible assets, including: computer software, copyright and patents.

Financial accounting

edit

General standards

edit

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) offers some guidance (IAS 38) as to how intangible assets should be accounted for in financial statements. In general, legal intangibles that are developed internally are not recognized and legal intangibles that are purchased from third parties are recognized.[2] Wordings are similar to IAS 9.

Under US GAAP, intangible assets[2][9] are classified into: Purchased vs. internally created intangibles, and Limited-life vs. indefinite-life intangibles. [citation needed]

Expense allocation

edit

Intangible assets are typically expensed according to their respective life expectancy.[2][7] Intangible assets have either an identifiable or an indefinite useful life. Intangible assets with identifiable useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their economic or legal life,[10] whichever is shorter. Examples of intangible assets with identifiable useful lives are copyrights and patents. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are reassessed each year for impairment. If an impairment has occurred, then a loss must be recognized. An impairment loss is determined by subtracting the asset's fair value from the asset's book/carrying value. Trademarks and goodwill are examples of intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. Goodwill has to be tested for impairment rather than amortized. If impaired, goodwill is reduced and loss is recognized in the Income statement.

Research and development

edit

Research and development (known also as R&D[2]) is considered to be an intangible asset (about 16 percent of all intangible assets in the US),[11] even though most countries treat R&D as current expenses for both legal and tax purposes. [2]Most countries report some intangibles in their National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA).[citation needed] The contribution of intangible assets in long-term GDP growth has been recognized by economists.[12] Also of note, acquired "In-Process Research and Development" (IPR&D) is considered an asset under US GAAP.[13]

IAS 38 requires any project that results in the generation of a resource to the entity be classified into two phases: a research phase, and a development phase.

The classification of research and development expenditure can be highly subjective, and it is important to note that organizations may have ulterior motives in their classification of research and development expenditures.[citation needed]

Taxation

edit

For personal income tax purposes, some costs with respect to intangible assets must be capitalized rather than treated as deductible expenses. Treasury regulations in the USA generally require capitalization of costs associated with acquiring, creating, or enhancing intangible assets.[14] For example, an amount paid to obtain a trademark must be capitalized. Certain amounts paid to facilitate these transactions are also capitalized. Some types of intangible assets are categorized based on whether the asset is acquired from another party or created by the taxpayer. The regulations contain many provisions intended to make it easier to determine when capitalization is required.[15]

Given the growing importance of intangible assets as a source of economic growth and tax revenue,[12] and because their non-physical nature makes it easier for taxpayers to engage in tax strategies such as income-shifting or transfer pricing,[16] tax authorities and international organizations have been designing ways to link intangible assets to the place where they were created, hence defining nexus. Intangibles for corporations are amortized over a 15-year period, equivalent to 180 months.

Definition of "intangibles" differs from standard accounting, in some US state governments. These governments may refer to stocks and bonds as "intangibles".[17]

Value of intangible assets

edit

The most valuable firms, spanning high-tech, pharmaceutical, automotive and financial services industries, derive their competitiveness and market value from intangible rather than physical, that is to say, “tangible” capital. Among companies in the S&P 500, intangibles including intellectual property account for 90% of the total market value. [18][19]

Intangible assets, though not always visible, play a crucial role in shaping the success of companies and countries in today's competitive environment. Investing in these assets helps businesses attract skilled talent, build customer loyalty, achieve market success, foster innovation and growth. [20][21]These assets also contribute to improved economic opportunities, higher-paying jobs, enhanced product quality. According to WIPO’s World IP Report (2017), intellectual property (IP) and other intangibles contribute on average twice as much value as tangible capital to products manufactured and traded along value chains. [22]

 
The fastest growing types of intangible asset over 2011-2021 have been software and data, followed by brands, organizational capital, and new financial products.

Recent estimates from Brand Finance used in the Global Innovation Index (GII) suggest that the global value of intangibles has been growing rapidly over the last 25 years to reach around USD 62 trillion in 2023. [23][21]

In 2023, intangible investment accounted for over 16 percent of GDP in highly intangible-intensive economies like Sweden, the United States of America (US) and France. [20]A trend showing intangible investment growing faster than tangible investment at country level. India was the country that experienced the fastest growth in intangible investment from 2011 to 2020.[20]

Software and data and brands are the two fastest growing types of intangible assets, both growing three times faster than R&D between 2011–2021.[20]

Valuing intangible assets is nevertheless a challenge. There is no single methodology to value them. Depending on the type of asset at hand, context and data availability, often a combination of different approaches is used. In most cases, the value of intangibles can be estimated considering the future economic benefits associated with the asset, like projected cash flows. However, for many intangibles in practice this can be difficult. The cost to repurchase or recreate an asset or comparison with transactions involving similar assets are also common methods to determine value. [21]

Intangible asset finance, also known as IP finance, is the branch of finance that uses intangible assets such as intellectual property (legal intangible) and reputation (competitive intangible) to gain access to credit. Intangible assets can for example be used in equity finance. For example, many Swiss companies use equity finance to support their growth, particularly Venture capital. The information gathered through interviews indicates that a supportive IP portfolio, particularly when reinforced by robust patents, plays a crucial role as a contributing factor. Without these rights, investors are reluctant to engage with startups. [24][25]In China, pledge-backed lending is the earliest type of IP financing developed and the fastest growing one. In 2022, the registered amount of patent and trademark pledged lending in China reached CNY 486.9 billion, up 57.1 percent year-on-year. Twenty-eight thousand projects from 26,000 chinese businesses received loans, both increasing about 65.5 percent year-on-year. [26][25]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ "World Intangible Investment Highlights - Better Data for Better Policy - World Intangible Investment Highlights". World Intangible Investment Highlights - Better Data for Better Policy. Retrieved 27 September 2024.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Webster, Elisabeth; Jensen, Paul H. (2006). Investment in Intangible Capital: An Enterprise Perspective. The Economic Record, Vol. 82, No. 256, March, 82-96.
  3. ^ Moberly, Michael D. (2014). Safeguarding Intangible Assets. Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-12-800516-3.
  4. ^ Brynjolfsson, Erik; Hitt, Lorin M.; Yang, Shinkyu (2002). "Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital". Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2002 (1): 137–181 – via JSTOR.
  5. ^ Lev, Baruch; Daum, Juergen (2004). "The dominance of intangible assets: consequences for enterprise management and corporate reporting" (PDF). Measuring Business Excellence. 8 (1): 6–17. doi:10.1108/13683040410524694. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 19 December 2012.
  6. ^ "SAC 4: Definition and Recognition of the Elements of Financial Statements" (PDF). Australian Accounting Standards Board. Retrieved 19 December 2012.
  7. ^ a b "IAS 38". International Accounting Standards Board. Retrieved 19 December 2012.
  8. ^ "IFRS - IAS 38 Intangible Assets". www.ifrs.org. Retrieved 27 September 2024.
  9. ^ "What are intangibles? | RoyaltyRange". www.royaltyrange.com. Retrieved 8 March 2023.
  10. ^ For international legal lives by class of intangible asset, see the table in Tax amortization lives of intangible assets
  11. ^ Bureau of Economic Analysis (2013). Preview of the 2013 Comprehensive Revision of the National Income and Product Accounts. https://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2013/03%20March/0313_nipa_comprehensive_revision_preview.pdf Archived 2017-07-02 at the Wayback Machine
  12. ^ a b Corrado, Carol. Charles Hulten, and Daniel Sichel (2006). Intangible Capital and Economic Growth. Federal Reserve Board Discussion Paper N. 2006-24. April. http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2006/200624/200624pap.pdf
  13. ^ "AICPA Issues Practice Aid on Acquired In-Process Research and Development Assets" (PDF). Defining Issues (14-4 ed.). KPMG, LLD. January 2014.
  14. ^ Treas. Reg. § 1.263(a)-4.
  15. ^ Donaldson, Samuel A. Federal Income Taxation Of Individuals: Cases, Problems and Materials (2nd ed.). St. Paul: Thomson West, 2007. pg. 200.
  16. ^ "Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting." (2013) Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/46349020.pdf
  17. ^ "Florida Intangible Tax". Archived from the original on 16 May 2015. Retrieved 2 October 2010.
  18. ^ "Intangible Asset Market Value Study". Ocean Tomo. Retrieved 27 September 2024.
  19. ^ Banker, Rajiv D.; Huang, Rong; Natarajan, Ramachandra (Ram); Zhao, Sha (2015). "Market Reaction to Intangible Asset Value: Evidence on SG&A Expenditure". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2589319. ISSN 1556-5068.
  20. ^ a b c d "World Intangible Investment Highlights - Better Data for Better Policy - World Intangible Investment Highlights". World Intangible Investment Highlights - Better Data for Better Policy. Retrieved 27 September 2024.
  21. ^ a b c "Intangible Assets and Intellectual Property". intangible-assets. Retrieved 27 September 2024.
  22. ^ "World Intellectual Property Report 2017 – Intangible Capital in Global Value Chains". www.wipo.int. Retrieved 27 September 2024.
  23. ^ "Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty". global-innovation-index. Retrieved 27 September 2024.
  24. ^ "Unlocking IP-backed Financing Series. Country Perspectives. Switzerland's Journey" (PDF). wipo.int. 2023. p. 13.
  25. ^ a b "Unlocking Intellectual Property-backed Financing – Country Perspectives". www.wipo.int. Retrieved 27 September 2024.
  26. ^ "Unlocking IP-backed Financing Series. Country Perspectives. China's Journey" (PDF). wipo.int. 2023. p. 14.
edit