Imitation learning is a paradigm in reinforcement learning, where an agent learns to perform a task by supervised learning from expert demonstrations. It is also called learning from demonstration and apprenticeship learning.[1][2][3]

It has been applied to underactuated robotics,[4] self-driving cars,[5][6][7] quadcopter navigation,[8] helicopter aerobatics,[9] and locomotion.[10][11]

Approaches

edit

Expert demonstrations are recordings of an expert performing the desired task, often collected as state-action pairs  .

Behavior Cloning

edit

Behavior Cloning (BC) is the most basic form of imitation learning. Essentially, it uses supervised learning to train a policy   such that, given an observation  , it would output an action distribution   that is approximately the same as the action distribution of the experts.[12]

BC is susceptible to distribution shift. Specifically, if the trained policy differs from the expert policy, it might find itself straying from expert trajectory into observations that would have never occurred in expert trajectories.[12]

This was already noted by ALVINN, where they trained a neural network to drive a van using human demonstrations. They noticed that because a human driver never strays far from the path, the network would never be trained on what action to take if it ever finds itself straying far from the path.[5]

DAgger

edit

Dagger (Dataset Aggregation)[13] improves on behavior cloning by iteratively training on a dataset of expert demonstrations. In each iteration, the algorithm first collects data by rolling out the learned policy  . Then, it queries the expert for the optimal action   on each observation   encountered during the rollout. Finally, it aggregates the new data into the dataset and trains a new policy on the aggregated dataset.[12]

Decision transformer

edit
 
Architecture diagram of the decision transformer.

The Decision Transformer approach models reinforcement learning as a sequence modelling problem.[14] Similar to Behavior Cloning, it trains a sequence model, such as a Transformer, that models rollout sequences  where   is the sum of future reward in the rollout. During training time, the sequence model is trained to predict each action  , given the previous rollout as context: During inference time, to use the sequence model as an effective controller, it is simply given a very high reward prediction  , and it would generalize by predicting an action that would result in the high reward. This was shown to scale predictably to a Transformer with 1 billion parameters that is superhuman on 41 Atari games.[15]

Other approaches

edit

See [16][17] for more examples.

edit

Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) learns a reward function that explains the expert's behavior and then uses reinforcement learning to find a policy that maximizes this reward.[18]

Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning (GAIL) uses generative adversarial networks (GANs) to match the distribution of agent behavior to the distribution of expert demonstrations.[19] It extends a previous approach using game theory.[20][16]

See also

edit

Further reading

edit
  • Hussein, Ahmed; Gaber, Mohamed Medhat; Elyan, Eyad; Jayne, Chrisina (2018-03-31). "Imitation Learning: A Survey of Learning Methods". ACM Computing Surveys. 50 (2): 1–35. doi:10.1145/3054912. hdl:10059/2298. ISSN 0360-0300.

References

edit
  1. ^ Russell, Stuart J.; Norvig, Peter (2021). "22.6 Apprenticeship and Inverse Reinforcement Learning". Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Pearson series in artificial intelligence (Fourth ed.). Hoboken: Pearson. ISBN 978-0-13-461099-3.
  2. ^ Sutton, Richard S.; Barto, Andrew G. (2018). Reinforcement learning: an introduction. Adaptive computation and machine learning series (Second ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. p. 470. ISBN 978-0-262-03924-6.
  3. ^ Hussein, Ahmed; Gaber, Mohamed Medhat; Elyan, Eyad; Jayne, Chrisina (2017-04-06). "Imitation Learning: A Survey of Learning Methods". ACM Comput. Surv. 50 (2): 21:1–21:35. doi:10.1145/3054912. hdl:10059/2298. ISSN 0360-0300.
  4. ^ "Ch. 21 - Imitation Learning". underactuated.mit.edu. Retrieved 2024-08-08.
  5. ^ a b Pomerleau, Dean A. (1988). "ALVINN: An Autonomous Land Vehicle in a Neural Network". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1. Morgan-Kaufmann.
  6. ^ Bojarski, Mariusz; Del Testa, Davide; Dworakowski, Daniel; Firner, Bernhard; Flepp, Beat; Goyal, Prasoon; Jackel, Lawrence D.; Monfort, Mathew; Muller, Urs (2016-04-25). "End to End Learning for Self-Driving Cars". arXiv:1604.07316v1 [cs.CV].
  7. ^ Kiran, B Ravi; Sobh, Ibrahim; Talpaert, Victor; Mannion, Patrick; Sallab, Ahmad A. Al; Yogamani, Senthil; Perez, Patrick (June 2022). "Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Survey". IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 23 (6): 4909–4926. arXiv:2002.00444. doi:10.1109/TITS.2021.3054625. ISSN 1524-9050.
  8. ^ Giusti, Alessandro; Guzzi, Jerome; Ciresan, Dan C.; He, Fang-Lin; Rodriguez, Juan P.; Fontana, Flavio; Faessler, Matthias; Forster, Christian; Schmidhuber, Jurgen; Caro, Gianni Di; Scaramuzza, Davide; Gambardella, Luca M. (July 2016). "A Machine Learning Approach to Visual Perception of Forest Trails for Mobile Robots". IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 1 (2): 661–667. doi:10.1109/LRA.2015.2509024. ISSN 2377-3766.
  9. ^ "Autonomous Helicopter: Stanford University AI Lab". heli.stanford.edu. Retrieved 2024-08-08.
  10. ^ Nakanishi, Jun; Morimoto, Jun; Endo, Gen; Cheng, Gordon; Schaal, Stefan; Kawato, Mitsuo (June 2004). "Learning from demonstration and adaptation of biped locomotion". Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 47 (2–3): 79–91. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2004.03.003.
  11. ^ Kalakrishnan, Mrinal; Buchli, Jonas; Pastor, Peter; Schaal, Stefan (October 2009). "Learning locomotion over rough terrain using terrain templates". 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE. pp. 167–172. doi:10.1109/iros.2009.5354701. ISBN 978-1-4244-3803-7.
  12. ^ a b c CS 285 at UC Berkeley: Deep Reinforcement Learning. Lecture 2: Supervised Learning of Behaviors
  13. ^ Ross, Stephane; Gordon, Geoffrey; Bagnell, Drew (2011-06-14). "A Reduction of Imitation Learning and Structured Prediction to No-Regret Online Learning". Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings: 627–635.
  14. ^ Chen, Lili; Lu, Kevin; Rajeswaran, Aravind; Lee, Kimin; Grover, Aditya; Laskin, Misha; Abbeel, Pieter; Srinivas, Aravind; Mordatch, Igor (2021). "Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modeling". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 34. Curran Associates, Inc.: 15084–15097. arXiv:2106.01345.
  15. ^ Lee, Kuang-Huei; Nachum, Ofir; Yang, Mengjiao; Lee, Lisa; Freeman, Daniel; Xu, Winnie; Guadarrama, Sergio; Fischer, Ian; Jang, Eric (2022-10-15), Multi-Game Decision Transformers, arXiv:2205.15241, retrieved 2024-10-22
  16. ^ a b Hester, Todd; Vecerik, Matej; Pietquin, Olivier; Lanctot, Marc; Schaul, Tom; Piot, Bilal; Horgan, Dan; Quan, John; Sendonaris, Andrew (2017-04-12). "Deep Q-learning from Demonstrations". arXiv:1704.03732v4 [cs.AI].
  17. ^ Duan, Yan; Andrychowicz, Marcin; Stadie, Bradly; Jonathan Ho, OpenAI; Schneider, Jonas; Sutskever, Ilya; Abbeel, Pieter; Zaremba, Wojciech (2017). "One-Shot Imitation Learning". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 30. Curran Associates, Inc.
  18. ^ A, Ng (2000). "Algorithms for Inverse Reinforcement Learning". Proc. Of 17th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2000: 663–670.
  19. ^ Ho, Jonathan; Ermon, Stefano (2016). "Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 29. Curran Associates, Inc. arXiv:1606.03476.
  20. ^ Syed, Umar; Schapire, Robert E (2007). "A Game-Theoretic Approach to Apprenticeship Learning". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 20. Curran Associates, Inc.