Kahn v. Shevin, 416 U.S. 351 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that granting widows a bonus property tax exemption not available to widowers does not violate the Equal Protection Clause because it has a "fair and substantial relation to the object of the legislation."[1] After holding a gender distinction that benefited men void in Reed v. Reed (1971), the Court was presented with cases like Kahn that dealt with gender distinctions that benefited women. The court in Kahn splintered over the question, but later held unanimously in Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld (1975) that a similar provision did violate the Equal Protection Clause.[2]
| Kahn v. Shevin | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided April 24, 1974 | |
| Full case name | Kahn v. Shevin |
| Citations | 416 U.S. 351 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Granting widows a bonus property tax exemption not available to widowers does not violate the Equal Protection Clause because it has a "fair and substantial relation to the object of the legislation." | |
| Court membership | |
| |
References
editExternal links
edit | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |