Wikipedia

Indo-Pakistani war of 1947–1948

(Redirected from Kashmir war)

The Indo-Pakistani war of 1947–1948, also known as the first Kashmir war,[25] was a war fought between India and Pakistan over the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir from 1947 to 1948. It was the first of four Indo-Pakistani wars between the two newly independent nations. Pakistan precipitated the war a few weeks after its independence by launching tribal lashkar (militias) from Waziristan,[26] in an effort to capture Kashmir and to preempt the possibility of its ruler joining India.[27]

Indo-Pakistani war of 1947–1948
Part of the Indo-Pakistani wars, Kashmir conflict, and the Partition of India

Indian soldiers during the 1947–1948 war
DateOctober 1947 – 1 January 1949
(1 year and 10 weeks)
Location
Jammu and Kashmir
Result See Aftermath section
Territorial
changes		 One-third of Jammu and Kashmir controlled by Pakistan. Indian control over remainder.[12][13]
Belligerents

India India

Pakistan Pakistan

Commanders and leaders
Lord Mountbatten
India Jawaharlal Nehru
British Raj Rob Lockhart[14]
British Raj Roy Bucher[14]
India K. M. Cariappa[14]
Hari Singh
Mehr Chand Mahajan
Sheikh Abdullah		 Muhammad Ali Jinnah
Liaquat Ali Khan
British Raj Frank Messervy[14]
British Raj Douglas Gracey[14]
Pakistan Col. Akbar Khan[15]
Pakistan Khurshid Anwar[16]
Pakistan Zaman Kiani[16]
Pakistan William Brown[4]
Casualties and losses
1,103 army deaths[17][18][19][20]
1,990 J&K forces killed or missing presumed killed[17]
32 RIAF members[17]
3,154 wounded[18][21]

Total military casualties:
6,279		 6,000 killed[21][22][23]
~14,000 wounded[21][24]

Total military casualties:
20,000
Conflict began when Pashtun tribesmen and Tanoli from Pakistan invaded the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, prompting the armies of India and Pakistan to get involved shortly afterwards.

Hari Singh, the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir, was facing an uprising by his Muslim subjects in Poonch, and lost control in portions of the western districts. On 22 October 1947, Pakistan's Pashtun tribal militias crossed the border of the state. These local tribal militias and irregular Pakistani forces moved to take the capital city of Srinagar, but upon reaching Baramulla, they took to plunder and stalled. Maharaja Hari Singh made a plea to India for assistance, and help was offered, but it was subject to his signing of an Instrument of Accession to India.

The war was initially fought by the Jammu and Kashmir State Forces[28][29] and by militias from the frontier tribal areas adjoining the North-West Frontier Province.[30] Following the accession of the state to India on 26 October 1947, Indian troops were airlifted to Srinagar, the state capital. British commanding officers initially refused the entry of Pakistani troops into the conflict, citing the accession of the state to India. However, later in 1948, they relented and Pakistan's armies entered the war shortly afterwards.[30] The fronts solidified gradually along what later came to be known as the Line of Control. A formal ceasefire was declared effective 1 January 1949.[31] Numerous analysts state that the war ended in a stalemate, with neither side obtaining a clear victory. Others, however, state that India emerged victorious as it successfully gained the majority of the contested territory.

Background

Further information: History of Kashmir and Jammu and Kashmir (princely state)

Prior to 1815, the area now known as "Jammu and Kashmir" comprised 22 small independent states (16 Hindu and six Muslim) carved out of territories controlled by the Amir (King) of Afghanistan, combined with those of local small rulers. These were collectively referred to as the "Punjab Hill States". These small states, ruled by Rajput kings, were variously independent, vassals of the Mughal Empire since the time of Emperor Akbar or sometimes controlled from Kangra state in the Himachal area. Following the decline of the Mughals, turbulence in Kangra and invasions of Gorkhas, the hill states fell successively under the control of the Sikhs under Ranjit Singh.[32]: 536 

The First Anglo-Sikh war (1845–46) was fought between the Sikh Empire, which asserted sovereignty over Kashmir, and the East India Company. In the Treaty of Lahore of 1846, the Sikhs were made to surrender the valuable region (the Jullundur Doab) between the Beas River and the Sutlej River and required to pay an indemnity of 1.2 million rupees. Because they could not readily raise this sum, the East India Company allowed the Dogra ruler Gulab Singh to acquire Kashmir from the Sikh kingdom in exchange for making a payment of 750,000 rupees to the company. Gulab Singh became the first Maharaja of the newly formed princely state of Jammu and Kashmir, founding a dynasty that was to rule the state, the second-largest principality during the British Raj, until India gained its independence in 1947.[citation needed]

Partition of India

 
Partition of India and the movement of refugees
 
Field Marshal Claude Auchinleck, Supreme Commander of Indian and Pakistani armed forces
Main article: Partition of India

The years 1946–1947 saw the rise of All-India Muslim League and Muslim nationalism, demanding a separate state for India's Muslims. The demand took a violent turn on the Direct Action Day (16 August 1946) and inter-communal violence between Hindus and Muslims became endemic. Consequently, a decision was taken on 3 June 1947 to divide British India into two separate states, the Dominion of Pakistan comprising the Muslim majority areas and the Dominion of India comprising the rest. The two provinces Punjab and Bengal with large Muslim-majority areas were to be divided between the two dominions. An estimated 11 million people eventually migrated between the two parts of Punjab, and possibly 1 million perished in the inter-communal violence.[citation needed] Jammu and Kashmir, being adjacent to the Punjab province, was directly affected by the happenings in Punjab.[citation needed]

The original target date for the transfer of power to the new dominions was June 1948. However, fearing the rise of inter-communal violence, the British Viceroy Lord Mountbatten advanced the date to 15 August 1947. This gave only six weeks to complete all the arrangements for partition.[33] Mountbatten's original plan was to stay on as the joint Governor General for both of the new dominions till June 1948. However, this was not accepted by the Pakistani leader Mohammad Ali Jinnah. In the event, Mountbatten stayed on as the Governor General of India, whereas Pakistan chose Jinnah as its Governor General.[34] It was envisaged that the nationalisation of the armed forces could not be completed by 15 August[a] and hence British officers stayed on after the transfer of power. The service chiefs were appointed by the Dominion governments and were responsible to them. The overall administrative control, but not operational control, was vested with Field Marshal Claude Auchinleck,[b] who was titled the 'Supreme Commander', answerable to a newly formed Joint Defence Council of the two dominions. India appointed General Rob Lockhart as its Army chief and Pakistan appointed General Frank Messervy.[39]

The presence of the British commanding officers on both sides made the Indo-Pakistani war of 1947 a strange war. The two commanding officers were in daily telephone contact and adopted mutually defensive positions. The attitude was that "you can hit them so hard but not too hard, otherwise there will be all kinds of repercussions."[40] Both Lockhart and Messervy were replaced in the course of war, and their successors Roy Bucher and Douglas Gracey tried to exercise restraint on their respective governments. Bucher was apparently successful in doing so in India, but Gracey yielded and let British officers be used in operational roles on the side of Pakistan. One British officer even died in action.[41]

Developments in Jammu and Kashmir (August–October 1947)

 
Maharaja Hari Singh of Jammu and Kashmir in military uniform

With the independence of the Dominions, the British Paramountcy over the princely states came to an end. The rulers of the states were advised to join one of the two dominions by executing an Instrument of Accession. Maharaja Hari Singh of Jammu and Kashmir, along with his prime minister Ram Chandra Kak, decided not to accede to either dominion. The reasons cited were that the Muslim majority population of the state would not be comfortable with joining India, and that the Hindu and Sikh minorities would become vulnerable if the state joined Pakistan.[42]

In 1947, the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir had a wide range of ethnic and religious communities. The Kashmir province consisting of the Kashmir Valley and the Muzaffarabad district had a majority Muslim population (over 90%). The Jammu province, consisting of five districts, had roughly equal numbers of Hindus and Muslims in the eastern districts (Udhampur, Jammu and Reasi), and a Muslim majority in the western districts (Mirpur and Poonch). The mountainous Ladakh district (wazarat) in the east had a significant Buddhist presence with a Muslim majority in Baltistan. The Gilgit Agency in the north was overwhelmingly Muslim and was directly governed by the British under an agreement with the Maharaja. Shortly before the transfer of power, the British returned the Gilgit Agency to the Maharaja, who appointed a Dogra governor for the district and a British commander for the local forces.[citation needed]

The predominant political movement in the Kashmir Valley, the National Conference led by Sheikh Abdullah, believed in secular politics. It was allied with the Indian National Congress and was believed to favour joining India. On the other hand, the Muslims of the Jammu province supported the Muslim Conference, which was allied to the All-India Muslim League and favoured joining Pakistan. The Hindus of the Jammu province favoured an outright merger with India.[43] In the midst of all the diverging views, the Maharaja's decision to remain independent was apparently a judicious one.[44]

Operation Gulmarg plan

 
 
Muzaffarabad
 
Poonch
 
Bhimber
 
Abbottabad
 
Swat
 
Dir
 
Chitral
 
Bannu
 
Wanna
 
Kohat
 
Thall
 
Nowshera
 
Indus river
 
Ravi river
class=notpageimage|
Operation Gulmarg locations

According to Indian military sources, the Pakistani Army prepared a plan called Operation Gulmarg and put it into action as early as 20 August, a few days after Pakistan's independence. The plan was accidentally revealed to an Indian officer, Major O. S. Kalkat serving with the Bannu Brigade.[c] According to the plan, 20 lashkars (tribal militias), each consisting of 1,000 Pashtun tribesmen, were to be recruited from among various Pashtun tribes, and armed at the brigade headquarters at Bannu, Wanna, Peshawar, Kohat, Thall and Nowshera by the first week of September. They were expected to reach the launching point of Abbottabad on 18 October, and cross into Jammu and Kashmir on 22 October. Ten lashkars were expected to attack the Kashmir Valley through Muzaffarabad and another ten lashkars were expected to join the rebels in Poonch, Bhimber and Rawalakot with a view to advance to Jammu. Detailed arrangements for the military leadership and armaments were described in the plan.[46][47]

The regimental records show that, by the last week of August, the 11th Prince Albert Victor's Own Cavalry (Frontier Force) (PAVO Cavalry) regiment was briefed about the invasion plan. Colonel Sher Khan, the Director of Military Intelligence, was in charge of the briefing, along with Colonels Akbar Khan and Khanzadah. The Cavalry regiment was tasked with procuring arms and ammunition for the 'freedom fighters' and establishing three wings of the insurgent forces: the South Wing commanded by General Kiani, a Central Wing based at Rawalpindi and a North Wing based at Abbottabad. By 1 October, the Cavalry regiment completed the task of arming the insurgent forces. "Throughout the war there was no shortage of small arms, ammunitions, or explosives at any time." The regiment was also told to be on stand by for induction into fighting at an appropriate time.[48][49][50]

Scholars have noted considerable movement of Pashtun tribes during September–October. By 13 September, armed Pashtuns drifted into Lahore and Rawalpindi. The Deputy Commissioner of Dera Ismail Khan noted a scheme to send tribesmen from Malakand to Sialkot, in lorries provided by the Pakistan government. Preparations for attacking Kashmir were also noted in the princely states of Swat, Dir, and Chitral. Scholar Robin James Moore states there is "little doubt" that Pashtuns were involved in border raids all along the Punjab border from the Indus to the Ravi.[51]

Pakistani sources deny the existence of any plan called Operation Gulmarg. However, Shuja Nawaz does list 22 Pashtun tribes involved in the invasion of Kashmir on 22 October.[52]

Rebellion in Poonch

 
Poonch district of Pakistan-administered Azad Kashmir (in green) along with Muzaffarabad (blue) and Mirpur (yellow) districts in 1947
Main article: 1947 Poonch rebellion

Sometime in August 1947, the first signs of trouble broke out in Poonch, about which diverging views have been received. Poonch was originally an internal jagir (autonomous principality), governed by an alternative family line of Maharaja Hari Singh. The taxation is said to have been heavy. The Muslims of Poonch had long campaigned for the principality to be absorbed into the Punjab province of British India. In 1938, a notable disturbance occurred for religious reasons, but a settlement was reached.[53] During the Second World War, over 60,000 men from Poonch and Mirpur districts enrolled in the British Indian Army. After the war, they were discharged with arms, which is said to have alarmed the Maharaja.[54] In June, Poonchis launched a 'No Tax' campaign.[55] In July, the Maharaja ordered that all the soldiers in the region be disarmed.[d] The absence of employment prospects coupled with high taxation drove the Poonchis to rebellion.[54] The "gathering head of steam", states scholar Srinath Raghavan, was utilised by the local Muslim Conference led by Sardar Muhammad Ibrahim Khan (Sardar Ibrahim) to further their campaign for accession to Pakistan.[57]

According to state government sources, the rebellious militias gathered in the Naoshera-Islamabad area, attacking the state troops and their supply trucks. A battalion of state troops was dispatched, which cleared the roads and dispersed the militias. By September, order was reestablished.[58] The Muslim Conference sources, on the other hand, narrate that hundreds of people were killed in Bagh during flag hoisting around 15 August and that the Maharaja unleashed a 'reign of terror' on 24 August. Local Muslims also told Richard Symonds, a British Quaker social worker, that the army fired on crowds, and burnt houses and villages indiscriminately.[59] According to the Assistant British High Commissioner in Pakistan, H. S. Stephenson, "the Poonch affair... was greatly exaggerated".[58]

Operation Datta Khel

Main article: Operation Datta Khel

Operation Datta Khel was a military operation and coup planned by Major William Brown along with the Gilgit Scouts, aimed at overthrowing the rule of the Dogra dynasty of Kashmir. The operation was launched shortly after the independence of Pakistan. By 1 November, Gilgit-Baltistan had been annexed from the Dogra dynasty, and was made part of Pakistan after a brief provisional government.[60]

Pakistan's preparations, Maharaja's manoeuvring

 
Liaquat Ali Khan, Prime Minister of Pakistan

Scholar Prem Shankar Jha states that the Maharaja had decided, as early as April 1947, that he would accede to India if it was not possible to stay independent.[61]: 115  The rebellion in Poonch possibly unnerved the Maharaja. Accordingly, on 11 August, he dismissed his pro-Pakistan Prime Minister, Ram Chandra Kak, and appointed retired Major Janak Singh in his place.[62] On 25 August, he sent an invitation to Justice Mehr Chand Mahajan of the Punjab High Court to come as the Prime Minister.[63] On the same day, the Muslim Conference wrote to the Pakistani Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan warning him that "if, God forbid, the Pakistan Government or the Muslim League do not act, Kashmir might be lost to them".[64] This set the ball rolling in Pakistan.[citation needed]

Liaquat Ali Khan sent a Punjab politician Mian Iftikharuddin to explore the possibility of organising a revolt in Kashmir.[65] Meanwhile, Pakistan cut off essential supplies to the state, such as petrol, sugar and salt. It also stopped trade in timber and other products, and suspended train services to Jammu.[66][67] Iftikharuddin returned in mid-September to report that the National Conference held strong in the Kashmir Valley and ruled out the possibility of a revolt.[citation needed]

 
Murree, overlooking Kashmir

Meanwhile, Sardar Ibrahim had escaped to West Punjab, along with dozens of rebels, and established a base in Murree. From there, the rebels attempted to acquire arms and ammunition for the rebellion and smuggle them into Kashmir. Colonel Akbar Khan, one of a handful of high-ranking officers in the Pakistani Army,[e] with a keen interest in Kashmir, arrived in Murree, and got enmeshed in these efforts. He arranged 4,000 rifles for the rebellion by diverting them from the Army stores. He also wrote out a draft plan titled Armed Revolt inside Kashmir and gave it to Mian Iftikharuddin to be passed on to the Pakistan's Prime Minister.[69][70][16]

On 12 September, the Prime Minister held a meeting with Mian Iftikharuddin, Colonel Akbar Khan and another Punjab politician Sardar Shaukat Hayat Khan. Hayat Khan had a separate plan, involving the Muslim League National Guard and the militant Pashtun tribes from the Frontier regions. The Prime Minister approved both the plans, and despatched Khurshid Anwar, the head of the Muslim League National Guard, to mobilise the Frontier tribes.[70][16]

 
Jawaharlal Nehru, Prime Minister of India

The Maharaja was increasingly driven to the wall with the rebellion in the western districts and the Pakistani blockade. He managed to persuade Justice Mahajan to accept the post of Prime Minister (but not to arrive for another month, for procedural reasons). He sent word to the Indian leaders through Mahajan that he was willing to accede to India but needed more time to implement political reforms. However, it was India's position that it would not accept accession from the Maharaja unless it had the people's support. The Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru demanded that Sheikh Abdullah should be released from prison and involved in the state's government. Accession could only be contemplated afterwards. Following further negotiations, Sheikh Abdullah was released on 29 September.[71][72]

Nehru, foreseeing a number of disputes over princely states, formulated a policy that states

"wherever there is a dispute in regard to any territory, the matter should be decided by a referendum or plebiscite of the people concerned. We shall accept the result of this referendum whatever it may be."[73][74]

The policy was communicated to Liaquat Ali Khan on 1 October at a meeting of the Joint Defence Council. Khan's eyes are said to have "sparkled" at the proposal. However, he made no response.[73][74]

Operations in Poonch and Mirpur

Main article: 1947 Poonch rebellion

Armed rebellion started in the Poonch district at the beginning of October 1947.[75][76] The fighting elements consisted of "bands of deserters from the State Army, serving soldiers of the Pakistan Army on leave, ex-servicemen, and other volunteers who had risen spontaneously."[77] The first clash is said to have occurred at Thorar (near Rawalakot) on 3–4 October 1947.[78] The rebels quickly gained control of almost the entire Poonch district. The State Forces garrison at the Poonch city came under heavy siege.[79][80]

In the Kotli tehsil of the Mirpur district, border posts at Saligram and Owen Pattan on the Jhelum river were captured by rebels around 8 October. Sehnsa and Throchi were lost after some fighting.[81][82] State Force records reveal that Muslim officers sent with reinforcements sided with the rebels and murdered the fellow state troops.[83]

Radio communications between the fighting units were operated by the Pakistan Army.[84] Even though the Indian Navy intercepted the communications, lacking intelligence in Jammu and Kashmir, it was unable to determine immediately where the fighting was taking place.[85]

Accession of Kashmir

Following the rebellions in the Poonch and Mirpur area[86] and the Pakistan-backed[87] Pashtun tribal intervention from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,[88][89] the Maharaja asked for Indian military assistance. India set the condition that Kashmir must accede to India for it to receive assistance. The Maharaja complied, and the Government of India recognised the accession of the princely state to India. Indian troops were sent to the state to defend it.[f] The Jammu & Kashmir National Conference volunteers aided the Indian Army in its campaign to drive out the Pathan invaders.[93]

Pakistan refused to recognise the accession of Kashmir to India, claiming that it was obtained by "fraud and violence."[94] Governor General Mohammad Ali Jinnah ordered his Army Chief General Douglas Gracey to move Pakistani troops to Kashmir at once. However, the Indian and Pakistani forces were still under a joint command, and Field Marshal Auchinleck prevailed upon him to withdraw the order. With its accession to India, Kashmir became legally Indian territory, and the British officers could not a play any role in an inter-Dominion war.[95][96] The Pakistan Army made available arms, ammunition, and supplies to the rebel forces who were dubbed the "Azad Army". Pakistan Army officers "conveniently" on leave and the former officers of the Indian National Army were recruited to command the forces.

 
A Pakistan Army convoy advances in Kashmir

In May 1948, the Pakistan Army officially entered the conflict, in theory to defend the Pakistan borders, but it made plans to push towards Jammu and cut the lines of communications of the Indian forces in the Mehndar Valley.[97] In Gilgit, the force of Gilgit Scouts under the command of a British officer Major William Brown mutinied and overthrew the governor Ghansara Singh. Brown prevailed on the forces to declare accession to Pakistan.[98][99] They are also believed to have received assistance from the Chitral Scouts and the Bodyguard of the state of Chitral, one of the princely states of Pakistan, which had acceded to Pakistan on 6 October 1947.[100][101]

Stages of the war

Initial invasion

 
Pashtun warriors from different tribes on their way to Kashmir

On 22 October the Pashtun tribal attack was launched in the Muzaffarabad sector. The state forces stationed in the border regions around Muzaffarabad and Domel were quickly defeated by tribal forces (Muslim state forces mutinied and joined them) and the way to the capital was open. Among the raiders, there were many active Pakistani Army soldiers disguised as tribals. They were also provided logistical help by the Pakistan Army. Rather than advancing toward Srinagar before state forces could regroup or be reinforced, the invading forces remained in the captured cities in the border region engaging in looting and other crimes against their inhabitants.[102] In the Poonch valley, the state forces retreated into towns where they were besieged.[103]

Records indicate that the Pakistani tribals beheaded many Hindu and Sikh civilians in Jammu and Kashmir.[104]

Indian operation in the Kashmir Valley

After the accession, India airlifted troops and equipment to Srinagar under the command of Lt. Col. Dewan Ranjit Rai, where they reinforced the princely state forces, established a defence perimeter and defeated the tribal forces on the outskirts of the city. Initial defense operations included the notable defense of Badgam holding both the capital and airfield overnight against extreme odds. The successful defence included an outflanking manoeuvre by Indian armoured cars[105] during the Battle of Shalateng. The defeated tribal forces were pursued as far as Baramulla and Uri and these towns, too, were recaptured.[citation needed]

In the Poonch valley, tribal forces continued to besiege state forces.[citation needed]

In Gilgit, the state paramilitary forces, called the Gilgit Scouts, joined the invading tribal forces, who thereby obtained control of this northern region of the state. The tribal forces were also joined by troops from Chitral, whose ruler, Muzaffar ul-Mulk the Mehtar of Chitral, had acceded to Pakistan.[106][107][108]

Indian forces ceased pursuit of tribal forces after recapturing Uri and Baramula, and sent a relief column southwards, in an attempt to relieve Poonch. Although the relief column eventually reached Poonch, the siege could not be lifted. A second relief column reached Kotli, and evacuated the garrisons of that town and others but were forced to abandon it being too weak to defend it. Meanwhile, Mirpur was captured by the tribal forces on 25 November 1947 with the help of Pakistan's PAVO Cavalry.[109] This led to the 1947 Mirpur massacre where Hindu women were reportedly abducted by tribal forces and taken into Pakistan. They were sold in the brothels of Rawalpindi. Around 400 women jumped into wells in Mirpur committing suicide to escape from being abducted.[110]

Fall of Jhanger and attacks on Naoshera and Uri

The tribal forces attacked and captured Jhanger. They then attacked Naoshera unsuccessfully, and made a series of unsuccessful attacks on Uri. In the south a minor Indian attack secured Chamb. By this stage of the war the front line began to stabilise as more Indian troops became available.[citation needed]

Operation Vijay: counterattack to Jhanger

The Indian forces launched a counterattack in the south recapturing Jhanger and Rajauri. In the Kashmir Valley the tribal forces continued attacking the Uri garrison. In the north, Skardu was brought under siege by the Gilgit Scouts.[111]

Indian spring offensive

The Indians held onto Jhanger against numerous counterattacks, who were increasingly supported by regular Pakistani Forces. In the Kashmir Valley the Indians attacked, recapturing Tithwail. The Gilgit scouts made good progress in the High Himalayas sector, infiltrating troops to bring Leh under siege, capturing Kargil and defeating a relief column heading for Skardu.[citation needed]

Operations Gulab and Eraze

Main article: Siege of Skardu

The Indians continued to attack in the Kashmir Valley sector driving north to capture Keran and Gurais (Operation Eraze).[112]: 308–324  They also repelled a counterattack aimed at Teetwal. In the Jammu region, the forces besieged in Poonch broke out and temporarily linked up with the outside world again. The Kashmir State army was able to defend Skardu from the Gilgit Scouts impeding their advance down the Indus valley towards Leh. In August the Chitral Scouts and Chitral Bodyguard under Mata ul-Mulk besieged Skardu and with the help of artillery were able to take Skardu. This freed the Gilgit Scouts to push further into Ladakh.[113][114]

Operation Bison

Main article: Military operations in Ladakh (1948)

During this time the front began to settle down. The siege of Poonch continued. An unsuccessful attack was launched by 77 Parachute Brigade (Brig Atal) to capture Zoji La pass. Operation Duck, the earlier epithet for this assault, was renamed as Operation Bison by Cariappa. M5 Stuart light tanks of 7 Cavalry were moved in dismantled conditions through Srinagar and winched across bridges while two field companies of the Madras Sappers converted the mule track across Zoji La into a jeep track. The surprise attack on 1 November by the brigade with armour supported by two regiments of 25-pounder gun-howitzers and a regiment of 3.7-inch mountain guns, forced the pass and pushed the tribal and Pakistani forces back to Matayan and later Dras. The brigade linked up on 24 November at Kargil with Indian troops advancing from Leh while their opponents eventually withdrew northwards toward Skardu.[115]: 103–127  The Pakistani attacked the Skardu on 10 February 1948 which was repulsed by the Indian soldiers.[116] Thereafter, the Skardu Garrison was subjected to continuous attacks by the Pakistan Army for the next three months and each time, their attack was repulsed by the Colonel Sher Jung Thapa and his men.[116] Thapa held the Skardu with hardly 250 men for whole six long months without any reinforcement and replenishment.[117] On 14 August, Thapa had to surrender Skardu to the Pakistani Army[118] and raiders after a year long siege.[119]

Main article: Military operations in Poonch (1948)

The Indians now started to get the upper hand in all sectors. Poonch was finally relieved after a siege of over a year. The Gilgit forces in the High Himalayas, who had previously made good progress, were finally defeated. The Indians pursued as far as Kargil before being forced to halt due to supply problems. The Zoji La pass was forced by using tanks (which had not been thought possible at that altitude) and Dras was recaptured.[citation needed]

At 23.59 hrs on 1 January 1949, a United Nations-mediated ceasefire came into effect, bring the war to an end.[31]

Aftermath

 
The Line of Control between India and Pakistan agreed in the Simla Agreement (UN Map)

The terms of the ceasefire, laid out in a UN Commission resolution on 13 August 1948,[120] were adopted by the commission on 5 January 1949.This required Pakistan to withdraw its forces, both regular and irregular, while allowing India to maintain minimal forces within the state to preserve law and order. Upon compliance with these conditions, a plebiscite was to be held to determine the future of the territory. Owing to disagreements over the demilitarisation steps, a plebiscite was never held and the cease-fire line essentially became permanent. Some sources may refer to 5 January as the beginning of the ceasefire.[121]

Indian losses in the war totalled 1,104 killed and 3,154 wounded;[18] Pakistani, about 6,000 killed and 14,000 wounded.[21]

Numerous analysts state that the war ended in a stalemate, with neither side obtaining a clear victory.[122] Others, however, state that India emerged victorious as it successfully gained the majority of the contested territory.[123]

India gained control of about two-thirds of the Jammu and Kashmir princely state, including the Kashmir Valley, the Jammu province and Ladakh. Pakistan had control of one-third of the state: three western districts later named Azad Jammu and Kashmir, and the northern areas including the Gilgit district, the Gilgit Agency and the Baltistan tehsil of the Ladakh district (later renamed Gilgit-Baltistan).[124][125][126][127]

India and Pakistan signed the Karachi Agreement in July 1949 and established a ceasefire line to be supervised by observers. After the termination of the UNCIP, the Security Council passed Resolution 91 (1951) and established a United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP) to observe and report violations of ceasefire.[128][129]

The resentment over Pakistani defeat in the war resulted in a failed coup led by General Akbar Khan in 1951 against the government of Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan. Army officers thought the government's acceptance of UN mediation and ceasefire was weak and squandered an opportunity to capture the entirety of Kashmir.[130][131][132][133]

After two further wars in 1965 and 1971, only minor changes in the ground situation had been effected. After the last war, the two countries reached the 1972 Simla Agreement, converting the cease-fire line into a Line of Control and disavowing the use of force across it. In 1984, India gained Siachen after launching a short military action.[134]

Military awards

Battle honours

After the war, a total of number of 11 battle honours and one theatre honour were awarded to units of the Indian Army, the notable amongst which are:[135]

  • Jammu and Kashmir 1947–48 (theatre honour)
  • Gurais
  • Kargil
  • Naoshera
  • Punch
  • Rajouri
  • Srinagar
  • Teetwal
  • Zoji La

Gallantry awards

For bravery, a number of soldiers and officers were awarded the highest gallantry award of their respective countries. Following is a list of the recipients of the Indian award Param Vir Chakra, and the Pakistani award Nishan-E-Haider:

India
Pakistan

See also

Notes

  1. ^ At the beginning of 1947, all the posts above the rank of lieutenant colonel in the army were held by British officers.[35] Pakistan had only four lieutenant colonels,[36] two of whom were involved in the Kashmir conflict: Akbar Khan and Sher Khan.[37] At the beginning of the war, India had about 500 British officers and Pakistan over 1000.[38]
  2. ^ Auchinleck was an Indian Army officer since 1903 who had been Commander-in-Chief, India from 1943
  3. ^ Major Kalkat was the brigade major at the Bannu Brigade, who opened a Demi-Official letter marked "Personal/Top Secret" on 20 August 1947 signed by General Frank Messervy, the then Commander in Chief of the Pakistan Army. It was addressed to Kalkat's commanding officer Brig. C. P. Murray, who happened to be away at another post. The Pakistani officials suspected Kalkat and placed him under house arrest. He escaped and made his way to New Delhi on 18 October. However, the Indian military authorities and defence minister did not believe his information. He was recalled and debriefed on 24 October after the tribal invasion of Kashmir had started.[45]
  4. ^ Under the Jammu and Kashmir Arms Act of 1940, the possession of all fire arms was prohibited in the state. The Dogra Rajputs were however exempted in practice.[56]
  5. ^ According to scholar Christine Fair, at the time of independence, Pakistan had one major general, two brigadiers, and six colonels, even though the requirements were for 13 major generals, 40 brigadiers, and 52 colonels.[68]
  6. ^ Accession from Kashmir was requested mainly at the insistence of the Governor General Lord Mountbatten, who was congnizant of the apprehensions of the British military officers on both the sides over the possibility of an inter-dominion war.[90] In fact, there was a Stand Down Order already issued by the Supreme Commander Claude Auchinleck that, in the event of an inter-Dominion war, all the British officers on both the sides should immediately stand down.[91] However, Mountbatten's decision has been questioned by Joseph Korbel and biographer Philip Ziegler.[92]

Citations

  1. ^ Kumar, Bharat (2014). An incredible war: Indian Air Force in Kashmir War 1947–1948 (2nd ed.). New Delhi: KW Publishers in association with Centre for Air Power Studies. ISBN 978-93-81904-52-7. Archived from the original on 6 February 2023.
  2. ^ Massey 2005, p. 97
  3. ^ Barua 2005, p. 192
  4. ^ a b Bangash, Three Forgotten Accessions 2010
  5. ^ Khanna, K. K. (2015). Art of Generalship. Vij Books India Pvt Ltd. p. 158. ISBN 978-93-82652-93-9.
  6. ^ a b c Jamal, Shadow War 2009, p. 57.
  7. ^ Nicholas Burns; Jonathon Price, eds. (2011). American Interests in South Asia: Building a Grand Strategy in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and India. Aspen Institute. pp. 155–. ISBN 978-1-61792-400-2.
  8. ^ Lamb, A. (2002). Incomplete Partition: The Genesis of the Kashmir Dispute, 1947-1948. Oxford University Press. p. 141. ISBN 978-0-19-579770-1.
  9. ^ Jamal, Shadow War 2009, p. 49.
  10. ^ Valentine, Simon Ross (2008). Islam and the Ahmadiyya Jama'at: History, Belief, Practice. Hurst Publishers. p. 204. ISBN 978-1-85065-916-7.
  11. ^ "Furqan Force". Persecution.org. Archived from the original on 2 June 2012.
  12. ^ Ciment, J.; Hill, K. (2012). Encyclopedia of Conflicts since World War II. Taylor & Francis. p. 721. ISBN 978-1-136-59614-8. Indian forces won control of most of Kashmir
  13. ^ "BBC on the 1947–48 war". Archived from the original on 30 January 2015.
  14. ^ a b c d e Dasgupta, War and Diplomacy in Kashmir 2014
  15. ^ Nawaz, The First Kashmir War Revisited 2008
  16. ^ a b c d Nawaz, The First Kashmir War Revisited 2008, p. 120.
  17. ^ a b c Prasad, Sri Nandan; Pal, Dharm (1987). Operations in Jammu & Kashmir, 1947–48 (PDF). History Division, Ministry of Defence, Government of India. p. 379. During the long campaign, the Indian Army lost 76 officers, 31 JCOs and 996 Other Ranks killed, making a total of 1103. The wounded totalled 3152, including 81 officers and 107 JCOs. Apart from these casualties, it appears that the J & K State Forces lost no less than 1990 officers and men killed, died of wounds, or missing presumed killed. The small RIAF lost a total of 32 officers and men who laid down their lives for the nation during these operations. In this roll of honour, there were no less than 9 officers.
  18. ^ a b c Malik, V. P. (2010). Kargil from Surprise to Victory (paperback ed.). HarperCollins Publishers India. p. 343. ISBN 9789350293133.
  19. ^ "An incredible war: Indian Air Force in Kashmir war, 1947–48", by Bharat Kumar, Centre for Air Power Studies (New Delhi, India)
  20. ^ Roy, Kaushik (2009). The Oxford Companion to Modern Warfare in India: From the Eighteenth Century to Present Times. Oxford University Press. p. 215. ISBN 978-0-19-569888-6. Archived from the original on 18 May 2022. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
  21. ^ a b c d Singh, Maj Gen Jagjit (2000). With Honour & Glory: Wars fought by India 1947–1999. Lancer Publishers. pp. 18–. ISBN 978-81-7062-109-6.
  22. ^ Sabir Sha (10 October 2014). "Indian military hysteria since 1947". The News International. Archived from the original on 17 November 2015.
  23. ^ Krishna, Ashok (1998). India's Armed Forces: Fifty Years of War and Peace. Lancer Publishers. pp. 160–. ISBN 978-1-897829-47-9.
  24. ^ By B. Chakravorty, "Stories of Heroism, Volume 1", p. 5
  25. ^ Nawaz, Shuja (May 2008), "The First Kashmir War Revisited", India Review, 7 (2): 115–154, doi:10.1080/14736480802055455, ISSN 1473-6489, S2CID 155030407
  26. ^ "Pakistan Covert Operations" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 September 2014.
  27. ^ Raghavan, War and Peace in Modern India 2010, pp. 31, 34–35, 105.
  28. ^ Schofield, Kashmir in Conflict 2003, p. 80.
  29. ^ Lyon, Peter (1 January 2008). Conflict Between India and Pakistan: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. p. 80. ISBN 978-1-57607-712-2.
  30. ^ a b Kashmir Archived 30 April 2015 at the Wayback Machine in Encyclopædia Britannica (2011), online edition
  31. ^ a b Prasad & Pal, Operations in Jammu & Kashmir 1987, p. 371.
  32. ^ Hutchison, J.; Vogel, Jean Philippe (1933). History of the Panjab Hill States. Superint., Gov. Print., Punjab.
  33. ^ Hodson, The Great Divide 1969, pp. 293, 320.
  34. ^ Hodson, The Great Divide 1969, pp. 293, 329–330.
  35. ^ Sarila, The Shadow of the Great Game 2007, p. 324.
  36. ^ Barua, Gentlemen of the Raj 2003, p. 133.
  37. ^ Nawaz, The First Kashmir War Revisited 2008.
  38. ^ Ankit, Kashmir, 1945–66 2014, p. 43.
  39. ^ Hodson, The Great Divide 1969, pp. 262–265.
  40. ^ Ankit, Kashmir, 1945–66 2014, pp. 54, 56.
  41. ^ Ankit, Kashmir, 1945–66 2014, pp. 57–58.
  42. ^ Ankit, Henry Scott 2010, p. 45.
  43. ^ Puri, Balraj (November 2010), "The Question of Accession", Epilogue, 4 (11): 4–6, archived from the original on 17 January 2023
  44. ^ Ankit, Henry Scott 2010.
  45. ^ Prasad & Pal, Operations in Jammu & Kashmir 1987, p. 17.
  46. ^ Prasad & Pal, Operations in Jammu & Kashmir 1987, pp. 17–19.
  47. ^ Kalkat, Onkar S. (1983). The Far-flung Frontiers. Allied Publishers. pp. 40–42.
  48. ^ Effendi, Punjab Cavalry (2007), pp. 151–153.
  49. ^ Joshi, Kashmir, 1947–1965: A Story Retold (2008), p. 59–.
  50. ^ Amin, Agha Humayun (August 2015), "Memories of a Soldier by Major General Syed Wajahat Hussain (Book Review)", Pakistan Military Review, Volume 18, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, ISBN 978-1-5168-5023-5, archived from the original on 8 March 2021, retrieved 17 April 2018
  51. ^ Moore, Making the new Commonwealth 1987, p. 49.
  52. ^ Nawaz, The First Kashmir War Revisited 2008, p. 124–125.
  53. ^ Ankit, The Problem of Poonch 2010, p. 8.
  54. ^ a b Schofield, Kashmir in Conflict 2003, p. 41.
  55. ^ State, Community and Neighbourhood in Princely North India, c. 1900–1950, By I. Copland. Palgrave Macmillan. 26 April 2005. p. 143. ISBN 978-0-230-00598-3.
  56. ^ Parashar, Parmanand (2004). Kashmir and the Freedom Movement. Sarup & Sons. pp. 178–179. ISBN 978-81-7625-514-1.
  57. ^ Raghavan, War and Peace in Modern India 2010, p. 105.
  58. ^ a b Ankit, The Problem of Poonch 2010, p. 9.
  59. ^ Snedden, Kashmir: The Unwritten History 2013, p. 42.
  60. ^ Warikoo, K. (2009). Himalayan Frontiers of India: Historical, Geo-Political and Strategic Perspectives. Routledge Contemporary South Asia Series. Taylor & Francis. p. 60. ISBN 978-1-134-03294-5.
  61. ^ Jha, Prem Shankar (March 1998), "Response (to the reviews of The Origins of a Dispute: Kashmir 1947)", Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 36 (1): 113–123, doi:10.1080/14662049808447762
  62. ^ Snedden, Christopher (2015). Understanding Kashmir and Kashmiris. Oxford University Press. p. 155. ISBN 978-1-84904-342-7.
  63. ^ Mahajan, Looking Back 1963, p. 123.
  64. ^ Raghavan, War and Peace in Modern India 2010, p. 103.
  65. ^ Bhattacharya, What Price Freedom 2013, pp. 25–27.
  66. ^ Ankit, October 1947 2010, p. 9.
  67. ^ Jamal, Shadow War 2009, p. 50.
  68. ^ Fair, C. Christine (2014). Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army's Way of War. Oxford University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-19-989271-6.
  69. ^ Guha, India after Gandhi 2008, Section 4.II.
  70. ^ a b Raghavan, War and Peace in Modern India 2010, pp. 105–106.
  71. ^ Raghavan, War and Peace in Modern India 2010, p. 106.
  72. ^ Victoria Schofield (2000). Kashmir in Conflict: India, Pakistan and the Unending War. I.B.Tauris. p. 44. ISBN 978-1-86064-898-4. Nehru therefore suggested to Patel that the maharaja should 'make friends with the National Conference, 'so that there might be this popular support against Pakistan'. Nehru had hoped that the maharaja could be persuaded to accede to India before any invasion took place and he realised that accession would only be more easily accepted if Abdullah, as a popular leader, were brought into the picture.
  73. ^ a b Raghavan, War and Peace in Modern India 2010, pp. 49–51.
  74. ^ a b Dasgupta, War and Diplomacy in Kashmir 2014, pp. 28–29.
  75. ^ ul-Hassan, Syed Minhaj (2015), "Qaiyum Khan and the War of Kashmir, 1947–48 AD." (PDF), FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 9 (1): 1–7, archived (PDF) from the original on 9 March 2017
  76. ^ Ganguly, Sumit (September 1995), "Wars without End: The Indo-Pakistani Conflict", The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 541, Sage Publications: 167–178, doi:10.1177/0002716295541001012, JSTOR 1048283, S2CID 144787951
  77. ^ Zaheer, The Times and Trial of the Rawalpindi Conspiracy 1998, p. 113.
  78. ^ Regimental History Cell, History of the Azad Kashmir Regiment, Volume 1 (1947–1949), Azad Kashmir Regimental Centre, NLC Printers, Rawalpindi,1997
  79. ^ Bose, Sumantra (2003). Kashmir: Roots of Conflict, Paths to Peace. Harvard University Press. p. 100. ISBN 0-674-01173-2.
  80. ^ Copland, Ian (2005). State, Community and Neighbourhood in Princely North India, c. 1900–1950. Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 143. ISBN 978-0-230-00598-3.
  81. ^ Cheema, Crimson Chinar 2015, p. 57.
  82. ^ Palit, Jammu and Kashmir Arms 1972, p. 162.
  83. ^ Brahma Singh, History of Jammu and Kashmir Rifles (2010), pp. 235–236.
  84. ^ Korbel, Danger in Kashmir 1966, p. 94.
  85. ^ Swami, Praveen (2007). India, Pakistan and the Secret Jihad: The covert war in Kashmir, 1947–2004. Asian Security Studies. Routledge. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-415-40459-4.
  86. ^ Lamb, Alastair (1997), Incomplete partition: the genesis of the Kashmir dispute 1947–1948, Roxford, ISBN 0-907129-08-0
  87. ^ Prasad & Pal, Operations in Jammu & Kashmir 1987, p. 18.
  88. ^ Filseth, Gunnar (13 November 2018). "Kashmir-konflikten". Archived from the original on 17 November 2015 – via Store norske leksikon.
  89. ^ "Kashmir-konflikten". NRK. 2 January 2002. Archived from the original on 18 June 2013.
  90. ^ Schofield, Kashmir in Conflict 2003, pp. 52–53.
  91. ^ Dasgupta, War and Diplomacy in Kashmir (2014), pp. 25–26.
  92. ^ Schofield, Kashmir in Conflict 2003, pp. 58–59.
  93. ^ My Life and Times. Allied Publishers Limited. 1992. ISBN 9788170233558. Archived from the original on 6 February 2023. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
  94. ^ Schofield, Kashmir in Conflict 2003, p. 61.
  95. ^ Schofield, Kashmir in Conflict 2003, p. 60.
  96. ^ Connell, John (1959). Auchinleck: A Biography of Field-Marshal Sir Claude Auchinleck. Cassell.
  97. ^ Schofield, Kashmir in Conflict 2003, pp. 65–67.
  98. ^ Schofield, Kashmir in Conflict 2003, p. 63.
  99. ^ Brown, William (30 November 2014). Gilgit Rebelion: The Major Who Mutinied Over Partition of India. Pen and Sword. ISBN 978-1-4738-2187-3.
  100. ^ Martin Axmann, Back to the future: the Khanate of Kalat and the genesis of Baluch Nationalism 1915–1955 (2008), p. 273
  101. ^ Tahir, M. Athar (2007). Frontier facets: Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province. National Book Foundation; Lahore.
  102. ^ Tom Cooper, I Indo-Pakistani War, 1947–1949 Archived 2 October 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Air Combat Information Group, 29 October 2003
  103. ^ Ministry of Defence, Government of India. Operations in Jammu and Kashmir 1947–1948. (1987). Thomson Press (India) Limited, New Delhi. This is the Indian Official History.
  104. ^ Iqbal, Khuram (2015). The Making of Pakistani Human Bombs. Lexington Books. p. 35. ISBN 978-1-4985-1649-5.
  105. ^ "Defence of Srinagar 1947". Indian Defence Review. Archived from the original on 18 March 2016.
  106. ^ Rahman, Fazlur (1 January 2007). Persistence and transformation in the Eastern Hindu Kush: a study of resource management systems in Mehlp Valley, Chitral, North Pakistan. In Kommission bei Asgard-Verlag. p. 32. ISBN 978-3-537-87668-3.
  107. ^ Wilcox, Wayne Ayres (1963). Pakistan: The Consolidation of a Nation. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-02589-8.
  108. ^ Snedden, Christopher (1 January 2015). Understanding Kashmir and Kashmiris. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-1-84904-342-7.
  109. ^ Effendi, Col. M. Y. (2007). Punjab Cavalry: Evolution, Role, Organisation and Tactical Doctrine 11 Cavalry, Frontier Force, 1849–1971. Karachi: Oxford University Press. pp. 157–160. ISBN 978-0-19-547203-5.
  110. ^ Tikoo, Colonel Tej K. (2013). "Genesis of Kashmir Problem and how it got Complicated: Events between 1931 and 1947 AD". Kashmir: Its Aborigines and their Exodus. New Delhi, Atlanta: Lancer Publishers. ISBN 978-1-935501-58-9.
  111. ^ Singh, Rohit. "Operations in Jammu and Kashmir 1947–1948" (PDF). Centre for Land Warfare Studies. pp. 141–142. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 October 2016.
  112. ^ Prasad, S.N.; Dharm Pal (1987). History of Operations in Jammu and Kashmir 1947–1948. New Delhi: History Department, Ministry of Defence, Government of India. (printed at Thomson Press (India) Limited). p. 418.
  113. ^ Singh, Harbakhsh (1 January 2000). In the Line of Duty: A Soldier Remembers. Lancer Publishers & Distributors. p. 227. ISBN 9788170621065.
  114. ^ Bloeria, Sudhir S. (31 December 1997). The battles of Zojila, 1948. Har-Anand Publications. p. 72. ISBN 9788124105092.
  115. ^ Sinha, Lt. Gen. S.K. (1977). Operation Rescue:Military Operations in Jammu & Kashmir 1947–49. New Delhi: Vision Books. p. 174. ISBN 81-7094-012-5.
  116. ^ a b Malhotra, A. (2003). Trishul: Ladakh And Kargil 1947–1993. Lancer Publishers. p. 5. ISBN 9788170622963.
  117. ^ Khanna, Meera (2015). In a State of Violent Peace: Voices from the Kashmir Valley. HarperCollins Publishers. ISBN 9789351364832.
  118. ^ Khanna, Meera (2015). In a State of Violent Peace: Voices from the Kashmir Valley. HarperCollins Publisher. ISBN 9789351364832.
  119. ^ Barua 2005, pp. 164–165.
  120. ^ "Resolution adopted by the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan on 13 August 1948". Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 3 April 2016.
  121. ^ Pastor-Castro, R.; Thomas, M. (2020). Embassies in Crisis: Studies of Diplomatic Missions in Testing Situations. Routledge Studies in Modern History. Taylor & Francis. p. 144. ISBN 978-1-351-12348-8.
  122. ^
    • Lamb, Alastair (1997). Incomplete Partition: The Genesis of the Kashmir Dispute 1947–1948. Roxford Books. pp. 181, 197. Following their open intervention, of course, the Indian strength on this sector, once established, increased rapidly; but never to such an extent as to threaten to overwhelm the Azad Kashmiri defenders. During the course of 1948 a stalemate was reached which has persisted more or less to the present day. A front line was stabilised which ran south from the Indian controlled Poonch salient, passed just west of Naoshera (which remained in Indian hands), and reached the old Punjab border (now that of Pakistan) a few miles to the west of the Chenab River. The Jammu & Kashmir State town garrisons to the west of this line were unable to hold out against Azad Kashmiri siege, many falling during the course of November 1947. The extreme south of this sector was really an extension of the Punjab plains; and here fighting could take place on a surprisingly large scale, so that in successive Indo-Pakistani Wars this was to be the scene of great clashes of armour and the use of tactical air power, at times of a magnitude which would have aroused notice in World War II
      As 1947 drew to a close, it was already possible to detect a pattern in the Kashmir conflict. The combination of the Azad Kashmiris and the Gilgit Scouts, with varying degrees of assistance both moral and material from Pakistan, had produced the beginnings of a stalemate, and this the cleverer soldiers on both sides appreciated. India now had over 90,000 regular troops in Jammu & Kashmir and yet no quick military solution was in sight. There would, of course, be much fighting in the future. 1948 saw both the epic struggle for Poonch and, later in the year, the Indian victories at the Zoji La and Kargil which achieved control over the Leh-Srinagar road and not only gave India Possession of the Ladakhi capital but also access to the desolate Tibetan borderlands without which the Sino-Indian conflict of the late 1950s would certainly have assumed a rather different form. By the beginning of 1948, however, astute observers could well have concluded that some kind of partition.

    • Kapur, S. Paul (2017). Jihad as Grand Strategy: Islamist Militancy, National Security, and the Pakistani State. Oxford University Press. pp. 49–50. ISBN 978-0-19-976852-3. Despite its inconclusive ending, the first Kashmir war had two major results. First, it demonstrated that nonstate actors could enable Pakistan to challenge India in a manner that limited the prospect of direct military confrontation ... Second, the war enhanced Kashmir's importance to Pakistan, extending the dispute well past the time of partition and transforming it into a contest of national resolve with India.

    • Margolis, Eric (2001). War at the Top of the World: The Struggle for Afghanistan, Kashmir, and Tibet. Routledge. pp. 121, 157. ISBN 0-415-92712-9. Meanwhile, in typical tribal fashion, the Pathans delayed their attack on Srinagar and its airfield in order to devote themselves to looting and pillage. This delay allowed India time to mount an air bridge to Srinagar. The Indians used their entire inventory of thirty Dakota military transports to airlift a battalion of Sikhs, blood enemies of the Pathans, to Srinagar's airfield. A three-thousand-man army brigade was rushed up the terrible roads from the plains to Kashmir. After a month of chaotic fighting, the Pathans and Muslim irregular forces were pushed westward by arriving Indian Army troops. Further inconclusive fighting, which was joined in 1948 by regular Pakistani army units, sputtered on until the United Nations imposed a ceasefire in January 1949 between India and Pakistan.

    • Khan, Feroz Hassan; Lavoy, Peter R.; Clary, Christopher (2009). "Pakistan's motivations and calculations for the Kargil conflict". In Lavoy, Peter R. (ed.). Asymmetric Warfare in South Asia: The Causes and Consequences of the Kargil Conflict. Cambridge University Press. p. 71. Kargil was a pivotal battleground during the First Kashmir War. In October 1947, Gilgit Scouts, assisted by Muslim soldiers in the Kashmir state army, mounted a successful coup d'etat in the Northern Areas. The so-called Azad (Free) Forces set up headquarters in the valley town of Astore. The rebels then recruited additional volunteers in the Gilgit and Baltistan regions and moved along the valleys and Indus River while pushing back the Kashmir state army. In February 1948, the "Azad Forces" besieged the garrison in Skardu where non-Muslim civilian and military personnel had taken refuge. In response Pakistan's motivations and calculations for the Kargil In the end, the fighting proved inconclusive, and Pakistani and Indian forces reached a military stalemate in Kashmir. The negotiated Cease-Fire Line was codified in the Karachi Agreement of 1949

    • Fortna, Virginia Page (2017). Peace Time: Cease-Fire Agreements and the Duribility of Peace. Princeton University Press. pp. 59–61. ISBN 978-0-691-11512-2. The war escalated toward the end of 1948, when Pakistan moved troops up from Lahore to fight in Jammu province, exposing itself to possible attack in the Punjab. However, before the war spread beyond the Kashmir territory, and before a conclusive military outcome was reached on the battlefield, a cease-fire was arranged by the United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan (UNCIP), a five-member body send by the UN to help resolve the conflict.

    • Khan, Saira (2009). Nuclear Weapons and Conflict Transformation: The Case of India-Pakistan. Asian Security Studies series. London and New York: Routledge. p. 91. ISBN 978-0-20389176-6. The first fifteen years of the India-Pakistan conflict witnessed violence of different intensities. Even before institutionalizing their independence, India and Pakistan were locked in a crisis which led to their first war from 1947 to 1949. Pakistan showed no hesitation in starting the war and India reciprocated in kind. Though inconclusive, the war has left a permanent mark on the India-Pakistan conflict.

    • Mohan, Surinder (6 October 2022). Complex Rivalry: The Dynamics of India-Pakistan Conflict. University of Michigan Press. p. 91. ISBN 978-0-472-22063-2. Later, when the outcome of the First Kashmir War did not favor either side, the resulting stalemate led to a puzzling division of Kashmir between the two adversaries.

    • Kennedy, Andrew (29 December 2011). The International Ambitions of Mao and Nehru: National Efficacy Beliefs and the Making of Foreign Policy. Cambridge University Press. p. 194. ISBN 978-1-139-50193-4. Although certain minor operations were possible, India was essentially confronted with a stalemate.

    • Fair, C. Christine (2014). Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army's Way of War. Oxford University Press. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-19-989270-9. Although the war ended in a stalemate with international intervention, Pakistan may have rightly concluded that the strategy of using irregular fighters succeeded.

    • Gardner, Kyle J. (21 January 2021). The Frontier Complex: Geopolitics and the Making of the India-China Border, 1846–1962. Cambridge University Press. p. 237. ISBN 978-1-108-84059-0. In the stalemate that followed the first Indo-Pakistani War...

    • Alagappa, Muthiah (2008). The Long Shadow: Nuclear Weapons and Security in 21st Century Asia. Stanford University Press. p. 218. ISBN 978-0-8047-6086-7. That effort failed, and the ensuing war in 1947 – 48 ended in a military stalemate.

    • Ganguly, Sumit (1 March 2004). The Kashmir Question: Retrospect and Prospect. Routledge. p. 94. ISBN 978-1-135-75658-1. In January 1948, with a military stalemate at hand, India referred the Kashmir dispute to the UN.

    • Chari, P. R.; Cheema, Pervaiz Iqbal; Cohen, Stephen P. (19 March 2009). Four Crises and a Peace Process: American Engagement in South Asia. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-8157-1386-9. With British officers present in both armies and the international community urging restraint, the conflict ended in a tactical and strategic stalemate.

    • Sprague, Stanley B. (12 November 2020). Pakistan Since Independence: A History, 1947 to Today. McFarland. p. 29. ISBN 978-1-4766-8151-1. A stalemate developed, with neither side able to win an overwhelming victory.

    • Snedden, Christopher (2015). Understanding Kashmir and Kashmiris. Oxford University Press. p. 185. ISBN 978-1-84904-342-7. In the south of J&K, the war situation was essentially a stalemate by 1949.

    • Quackenbush, Stephen L. (12 August 2014). International Conflict: Logic and Evidence. SAGE. p. 323. ISBN 978-1-4522-4098-5. The first Kashmir War between India and Pakistan lasted from October 1947 to January 1949 and ended in a stalemate...

    • Ankit, Rakesh (17 June 2016). The Kashmir Conflict: From Empire to the Cold War, 1945–66. Routledge. p. 63. ISBN 978-1-317-22525-6. The outcome was a stalemate in which India's democratic desires and Pakistan's security aims were stymied on the altar of greater concerns

    • Behera, Navnita Chadha (1 May 2007). Demystifying Kashmir. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 76. ISBN 978-0-8157-0859-9. The 1947 war ended in a military stalemate

    • Ray, Jayanta Kumar (2007). Aspects of India's International Relations, 1700 to 2000: South Asia and the World. Pearson Education India. p. 208. ISBN 978-81-317-0834-7. With the onset of winter and the consequent problems of maintaining the supply lines, the military situation reached a stalemate.

    • Duschinski, Haley; Bhan, Mona; Zia, Ather (2018), "Introduction "Rebels of the Streets": Violence, Protest, and Freedom in Kashmir", in Duschinski, Haley; Bhan, Mona; Zia, Ather; Mahmood, Cynthia (eds.), Resisting Occupation in Kashmir, Pennsylvania University Press, p. 2, ISBN 978-0-8122-4978-1, Since India's independence from British colonial rule and the subsequent partition in 1947, India and Pakistan, both of which claim sovereign control over the region, have found four inconclusive wars over Kashmir.
  123. ^
  124. ^ New Zealand Defence Quarterly, Issues 24–29. New Zealand. Ministry of Defence. 1999. India won, and gained two-thirds of Kashmir, which it successfully held against another Pakistani invasion in 1965.
  125. ^ Hagerty, Devin (2005). South Asia in World Politics. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 460. ISBN 978-0-7425-2587-0.
  126. ^ The Kingfisher History Encyclopedia. Kingfisher. 2004. p. 460. ISBN 978-0-7534-5784-9. Indo Pakistani war of 1947: India gained two third Kashmir.
  127. ^ Thomas, Raju (1992). Perspectives on Kashmir: the roots of conflict in South Asia. Westview Press. p. 25. ISBN 978-0-8133-8343-9 – via archive.org.
  128. ^ "UNMOGIP Background". Archived from the original on 3 July 2017. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
  129. ^ Shucksmith, Christy; White, Nigel D. (2015), "United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan (UNMOGIP)", in Joachim Alexander Koops; Norrie MacQueen; Thierry Tardy; Paul D. Williams (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of United Nations Peacekeeping Operations, Oxford University Press, pp. 139–, ISBN 978-0-19-968604-9
  130. ^ Hasan Zaheer (1998). The Times and Trial of the Rawalpindi Conspiracy 1951: The First Coup Attempt in Pakistan. Oxford University Press. pp. xvi, 28–29. ISBN 978-0-19-577892-2.
  131. ^ "Rawalpindi conspiracy case, part 1". The Nation (Opinion). 27 August 2009. Archived from the original on 28 August 2009. Retrieved 19 December 2023.
  132. ^ Ahmed, T. (2020). Literature and Politics in the Age of Nationalism: The Progressive Episode in South Asia, 1932–56. Taylor & Francis. p. 128. ISBN 978-1-000-08394-1.
  133. ^ Shaikh, Farzana (2018). Making Sense of Pakistan. Oxford University Press. p. 231. ISBN 978-0-19-006206-4.
  134. ^ Batra, A. (2012). Regional Economic Integration in South Asia: Trapped in Conflict?. Routledge Contemporary South Asia Series. Taylor & Francis. p. 76. ISBN 978-1-135-12984-2.
  135. ^ Singh, Sarbans (1993). Battle Honours of the Indian Army 1757 – 1971. New Delhi: Vision Books. pp. 227–238. ISBN 81-7094-115-6.

Bibliography

Further reading

Major sources
  • Ministry of Defence, Government of India. Operations in Jammu and Kashmir 1947–1948. (1987). Thomson Press (India) Limited, New Delhi. This is the Indian Official History.
  • Lamb, Alastair. Kashmir: A Disputed Legacy, 1846–1990. (1991). Roxford Books. ISBN 0-907129-06-4.
  • Praval, K.C. The Indian Army After Independence. (1993). Lancer International, ISBN 1-897829-45-0
  • Sen, Maj Gen L.P. Slender Was The Thread: The Kashmir confrontation 1947–1948. (1969). Orient Longmans Ltd, New Delhi.
  • Vas, Lt Gen. E. A. Without Baggage: A personal account of the Jammu and Kashmir Operations 1947–1949. (1987). Natraj Publishers Dehradun. ISBN 81-85019-09-6.
Other sources
  • Cohen, Lt Col Maurice. Thunder over Kashmir. (1955). Orient Longman Ltd. Hyderabad
  • Hinds, Brig Gen SR. Battle of Zoji La. (1962). Military Digest, New Delhi.
  • Sandhu, Maj Gen Gurcharan. The Indian Armour: History Of The Indian Armoured Corps 1941–1971. (1987). Vision Books Private Limited, New Delhi, ISBN 81-7094-004-4.
  • Singh, Maj K Brahma. History of Jammu and Kashmir Rifles (1820–1956). (1990). Lancer International New Delhi, ISBN 81-7062-091-0.
  • Ayub, Muhammad (2005). An army, Its Role and Rule: A History of the Pakistan Army from Independence to Kargil, 1947–1999. RoseDog Books. ISBN 9780805995947.
 
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Indo-Pakistani War of 1947.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Pakistani_war_of_1947–1948&oldid=1256410061"