It is requested that the page history of Draft:Kentucky v. Stincer be merged into the history of this page. This action must be performed by an administrator (compare pages).
Consider placing Administrators: Before merging the page histories, read the instructions at Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves carefully. An incorrect history merge is very difficult to undo. Also check Wikipedia:Requests for history merge for possible explanation of complex cases. |
Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the respondent's rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment were not violated by his exclusion from the competency hearing.[1]
| Kentucky v. Stincer | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided June 19, 1987 | |
| Full case name | Kentucky v. Stincer |
| Citations | 482 U.S. 730 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Respondent's rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment were not violated by his exclusion from the competency hearing. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Laws applied | |
| Confrontation Clause | |
Significance
editAlthough the respondent in this case lost, the case represents the fact that the criminal defendant's right to be present and participate in their trial is broader than the explicit protection of Confrontation. Under the Due Process Clause, the defendant has a right to be present at any critical stage of the trial where their appearance affects the fairness of the outcome.[1][2]
References
editExternal links
editThis article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |