The Kugu Nganhcara, also Wikngenchera, Wik-Ngandjara (Ngandjara)[1] are an Australian group of peoples living in the middle western part of the Cape York Peninsula, Queensland in Australia. Today they are primarily concentrated at Aurukan and the Edward river settlement.

Language

edit

Kugu Nganhcara is a Wik-language complex[a] consisting of six varieties or patrilects, Kugu Uwanh, Kugu Ugbanh, Kugu Yi'anh, Kugu Mi'inh, Kugu Miminh, and Wik Iyanh, where 'kugu' is a classifier for speech, and the following word the infinitive of the respective verbs for 'go'.[3] These closely related languages are called patrilects by Steve Johnson since the respective groups belong to a society composed of patrilineal clans joined by exogamous relationships.[4]

Country

edit

The northern bounds of the Kugu Nganhcara are around the Kendall River, and their southern limits are around Moonkan Creek,[5] beyond which lie their southern neighbours the Thaayorre.[6]

Socio-linguistic division markers

edit

The Kugu-Nganychara embrace the following groups:[7]

  • Kugu Miminh
  • Kugu-Mu'inh
  • Kugu Uwanh
  • Kugu Ugbanh
  • Kugu-Mangk
  • Kugu Yi'anh
  • Wik-Iiyanh
  • Kugu Mi'ing
  • Wik Iyanh[b]

Wiknantjara

edit

Norman Tindale used this term to refer to a Kugu group he identified as that whose clan estates covered about 300 square miles (780 km2) in the area between the mouths of the Holroyd River,[9] which would appear to be coterminous with the area assigned to the Kugu Ugbanh. Peter Sutton remarks that this term does not refer to a single dialect, but covers all the clans forming part of a dialect chain between the Kendall and Holroyd Rivers, and that the local name for the cluster is local term is Kugu-Nganycharra (known at Cape Keerweer as Wik-Ngenycharra.[10]

Notes

edit
  1. ^ 'There is no single language which can usefully be referred to as Wik-Nganychara for this term covers a number of dialects which differ quite markedly from each other.'[2]
  2. ^ The Wik Iyanh speak a language that looks like sharing close affinities with Wik-Mungkan, due to the flow of morphological features borrowed from the latter, and in the past had been classified as being a subgroup of the latter. According to Steve Johnson, comparative analysis suggests to the contrary that it forms part of the Kugu Nganhcara society though not as closely integrated as the other five clans.[8]

Citations

edit
  1. ^ AIATSIS Y59.
  2. ^ von Sturmer 1978, p. 36,n.2.
  3. ^ Johnson 1991, p. 204.
  4. ^ Johnson 1991, p. 205.
  5. ^ von Sturmer 1978, pp. 169, 181.
  6. ^ Gaby 2005, p. 10.
  7. ^ von Sturmer 1978, p. 32.
  8. ^ Johnson 1991, pp. 204–205, 209.
  9. ^ Tindale 1974, p. 189.
  10. ^ Sutton 1979, pp. 38–39.

Sources

edit