Lawyers for Climate Action NZ Inc (LCANZI, also known as LCANZ) is a climate advocacy group that has been active since 2019.[1][2] A non-profit, it includes over 300 lawyers, solicitors, and academics.[3] LCANZI was created to encourage New Zealand to take more ambitious actions to meet its Paris Agreement commitments.[4][5]
LCANZI has advocated for New Zealand's law and actions to be consistent with its stated commitments under the Paris Agreement, Te Tiriti o Waitangi,[6] and requirements under recent climate regulation such as the Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act.[4] Activities undertaken by the group have included climate change litigation, consultation, submissions, and pro-bono legal advice.[5]
History
editLCANZI held its first AGM in June 2019 and elected Jenny Cooper as president.[2] Membership has been open to all people who hold a law degree, however students and non-lawyers have also been able to join as associates.[1]
Lawyers for Climate Action v. Firstgas Group
editIn 2021, LCANZI filed a complaint with the New Zealand Advertising Standards Authority against an advertising campaign by First Gas.[7] LCANZI argued that the First Gas advertisements amounted to greenwashing, due to factual inaccuracies and encouragement of complacency instead of action to address climate change. This claim was partially upheld by the New Zealand Advertising Standards board, which ordered First Gas to remove the advertisements.[7]
Lawyers for Climate Action v. Climate Change Commission
editIn another notable case in 2021, LCANZI filed a judicial review of the New Zealand Climate Change Commission’s recommendations to the New Zealand Government.[8] This case questioned the Climate Change Commission's carbon calculations and accounting[4] that informed the recommendations for the government's amendment of New Zealand's nationally determined contribution for 2021 to 2030.[9] LCANZI advocated for more transparent recommendations that clearly advocated for domestic emission reductions and contributed to New Zealand's global commitments towards a 1.5°C pathway.
The case was unsuccessful with the High Court ruling that the Zero Carbon Act did not require meeting the 1.5°C global pathway in order to contribute to global commitments towards this aim.[10] Justice Jill Mallon stated that other factors—such as economic impacts—are also important to the Climate Change Commission's recommendations.[10] The Climate Change Commission described defending itself as a non-beneficial use of time and resources for the New Zealand public, and, unsuccessfully, sought for LCANZI to pay for its costs.[11]
Present
editAs of 2023, LCANZI's current President is Bronwyn Carruthers.[12][1] LCANZI has said it will appeal the Climate Commission case through the court of appeal.[11]
Change litigation in New Zealand
editWhile achieving success internationally, climate change ligation has not yet achieved significant rulings in New Zealand.[6] Instead, recent court rulings have stressed the need for further regulation from policy makers before issues can be addressed in the courts.
Courts have also highlighted the costs of private litigation as a barrier for using this method to achieve timely and efficient action on climate change.[6] High costs have also affected LCANZI, which describes itself as a small volunteer-based organisation funded by membership rates.[13]
While environmental litigation cases often fall under public interest in New Zealand—therefore not receiving costs if court cases are lost—public interest status is not guaranteed. In discussing LCANZI, David Bullock, the author of a book on cost recovery cases in New Zealand, said that high costs against public interest groups could have a chilling effect on further environmental litigation.[13]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c "About Us". Lawyers for Climate Action NZ Inc. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
- ^ a b "News & Events". Lawyers for Climate Action NZ Inc. 8 August 2019. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
- ^ Corlett, Eva (2 July 2021). "New Zealand lawyers sue climate change body over alleged failure to meet targets". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
- ^ a b c Green, Kate (23 November 2022). "High Court rules against climate change action case over commission's advice to government". RNZ. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
- ^ a b Dobson, Jamie (2021). "The right to a sustainable environment" (PDF). LawTalk (945): 6–8 – via New Zealand Law Society.
- ^ a b c Cooper, Nathan (13 December 2021). "Courts around the world have made strong climate rulings – not so in New Zealand". The Conversation. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
- ^ a b "Australian and Pacific Climate Change Litigation". law.app.unimelb.edu.au. 2021. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
- ^ Ewing, Isobel (23 November 2022). "High Court judge agrees with group that New Zealand's climate change law lags behind global targets". Newshub. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
- ^ "Judicial review of Climate Change Commission and Minister of Climate Change". Ministry for the Environment. 23 November 2022. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
- ^ a b Stevens, Ric (23 May 2023). "Lawyers seeking steeper emissions cuts lose court bid". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
- ^ a b Wannan, Olivia (22 March 2023). "Climate Change Commission fails to get costs back from activist group". Stuff. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
- ^ Or, Mary (13 May 2023). "Lawyers for Climate Action NZ questions climate change regulations before High Court". www.thelawyermag.com. Retrieved 23 May 2023.
- ^ a b Daalder, Marc (21 February 2023). "Climate commission seeks $130k from activists". Newsroom. Retrieved 23 May 2023.